Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police shoot, kill woman during "welfare check" (KS)
KCTV5 ^ | 04/01/10 | KCTV5

Posted on 04/01/2010 5:59:09 AM PDT by Fido969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/01/2010 5:59:10 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fido969

I’m thinking something went horribly wrong, or some officers don’t know what a ‘welfare check’ is. lol.


2 posted on 04/01/2010 6:02:27 AM PDT by GeronL (There is only a "Happily ever after" for you if you're the one writing your own script)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

“Dispatch, doesn’t look good, I think we’re going to need the coroner.”

“Are you sure? Make sure she’s dead first.”

*BANG*

“Yep, she’s dead.”


3 posted on 04/01/2010 6:02:58 AM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Too few details (including if she actually had a weapon) to form and opinion, though at first glance, I can not understand why it was necessary for Jack-Booted THUGS (my new name for 95%$ of SWAT Teams) to go in and escalate the situation.


4 posted on 04/01/2010 6:05:11 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Kind of a drastic way to reduce the welfare rolls.


5 posted on 04/01/2010 6:05:22 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Described as an incident.

More like too many people trying to “help” someone, and not backing off, allowing themselves to be manipulated into having to protect themselves ostensibly. Watcha gonna do, when they come for you.


6 posted on 04/01/2010 6:06:21 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

LOL!

I heard the “hunters” version.

Still funny.


7 posted on 04/01/2010 6:19:42 AM PDT by Salamander (....and I'm sure I need some rest but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

To justify their budgets for having them around. That’s why!


8 posted on 04/01/2010 6:31:46 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Not to worry. She’ll still be able to vote...multiple times.


9 posted on 04/01/2010 6:32:49 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

“We were trying to help her out, and get her the help she needed.”


10 posted on 04/01/2010 6:40:10 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Hmmm...from Kansas maybe she was threatening to release Obambi’s BC. Afterall Aunt Zuni is living on our dime in Beantown.


11 posted on 04/01/2010 7:09:55 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

These sort of police calls are not uncommon. However, police are conditioned to be of a “predatory” nature in confrontations, in which they won’t back down, even when that would have a better outcome.

So one alternative is using what could be called “counter barricades”, which would be to put bullet resistant panels in front of doors and windows. The idea is to prevent whoever is inside from easily shooting outside. Once such shields are erected, then the police can just back away to let things cool down.


12 posted on 04/01/2010 7:35:45 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet
Too few details (including if she actually had a weapon) to form and opinion, though at first glance, I can not understand why it was necessary for Jack-Booted THUGS (my new name for 95%$ of SWAT Teams) to go in and escalate the situation.

In other words, "I don't know the details of the situation, but it's clear the police acted stupidly when there was proof the woman was in her own home." Sounds familiar.

13 posted on 04/01/2010 8:45:19 AM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wita

All officers on all calls to people’s homes should be required to take dogs with them so that they will be able to exercise their union contract rights to shoot someone without having to kill a human being. Police departments should have a regular arrangement with Animal Control. All citizens who are able to should keep at least one dog in the home for the same reason.It is better for beloved Rover to take a bullet than Aunt Claire.


14 posted on 04/01/2010 8:56:50 AM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I have postulated for years that police coming to a private citizens door should do so unarmed and in suits, not uniform.

Some might consider this dangerous for the police, but that is what they get payed for, not offing helpless citizens.


15 posted on 04/01/2010 9:27:38 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

“I’m here from the governement ,to help”. bang!


16 posted on 04/01/2010 9:27:47 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( FIRE STUPAK: LindaForCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
I once knew a cop who got shot by a woman during a "welfare check." Wouldn't be surprised if something similar went down here.

These cops were called to this place for a reason. My guess is that the woman was violent, and possibly suicidal.

17 posted on 04/01/2010 9:31:37 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Was she was hiding Elián González ?


18 posted on 04/01/2010 9:45:27 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( FIRE STUPAK: LindaForCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

You have been infected.


19 posted on 04/01/2010 9:50:03 AM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet
As Reagan used to say (in paraphrase), one of the scariest sentences in the English language is "We're from the government, and we're here to help you." With "help" like that, who needs enemies?

Redistribution is Theft III, medium
20 posted on 04/01/2010 9:52:38 AM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson