To: Fido969
Too few details (including if she actually had a weapon) to form and opinion, though at first glance, I can not understand why it was necessary for Jack-Booted THUGS (my new name for 95%$ of SWAT Teams) to go in and escalate the situation.
4 posted on
04/01/2010 6:05:11 AM PDT by
Conservative Vermont Vet
((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
To: Conservative Vermont Vet
To justify their budgets for having them around. That’s why!
To: Conservative Vermont Vet
Too few details (including if she actually had a weapon) to form and opinion, though at first glance, I can not understand why it was necessary for Jack-Booted THUGS (my new name for 95%$ of SWAT Teams) to go in and escalate the situation.In other words, "I don't know the details of the situation, but it's clear the police acted stupidly when there was proof the woman was in her own home." Sounds familiar.
13 posted on
04/01/2010 8:45:19 AM PDT by
xjcsa
(Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
To: Conservative Vermont Vet
19 posted on
04/01/2010 9:50:03 AM PDT by
verity
(Obama Lies)
To: Conservative Vermont Vet
As Reagan used to say (in paraphrase), one of the scariest sentences in the English language is "We're from the government, and we're here to help you." With "help" like that, who needs enemies?
20 posted on
04/01/2010 9:52:38 AM PDT by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
