I think it’s a bad idea for a constitutional convention, so if that’s the route you are suggesting, it’s just a bigger can of worms that can turn uglier than what we have in front of us, already, IMO
You should study it. Think of how many counties that conservatives control because the convention does not pass anything, it only proposes but the people in the countryside decide whether what is proposed is ratified (passed), and little Idaho is as powerful as California.
There has been a lot of fear tactics used to make people react just like you did. It’s a “can of worms”. The Left likes you to think that because they know if the people in the countryside ever wake up to what the framers gave them in the Constitution, they will lose.
You should study before jumping to a fearful opinion.
One step at a time we are going. The convention will follow when the time is right. First we must destroy the enemy and then put the pieces into place to ensure they never rise again.
Thanks for this thread. Here are some afterthoughts:
“If you were in the 1960s and you were a radical and you believed in a Marxist revolution, you were crushed.”
On this point, Beck is pitifully mistaken. The left may have been stalled, but it definitely was not crushed.
They survived, reformed, realigned their immediate objectives and now, at this moment are prevailing.
Take a look at the politically correct campuses, grade schools and many local governments.
Count the members of Congress proudly and publically listed as members of the Democratic Socialists of America (Pelosi resigned upon becoming the Speaker), its offshoots the Hispanic Caucus and the Black Caucus.
Take a look at the Oval Office, take a look at the out-of-the-closet credentials of O’s various appointments, judicial and otherwise.
It is imperative that Americans recognize their agenda.
As stated elsewhere this morning: “The left regards dissent as hate speech.”
Anyone disagree with that?
Whatever we do, our defense of the Constitution must not be defined with their terms.