1 posted on
03/16/2010 4:12:45 AM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
“Most of these soldiers have never been in a fistfight or any kind of a physical confrontation. They are stunned when they get smacked in the face,” said Capt. Scott Sewell, overseeing almost 190 trainees in their third week of training. “We are trying to get them to act, to think like warriors.”
When I was in GRADE school we were fighting. Things sure have changed.
2 posted on
03/16/2010 4:19:16 AM PDT by
dljordan
(Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
To: decimon
If you really want to witness Army training, go to Ft. Benning ,GA , Home of the Infantry.
They don't do 5 mile runs either , they do 12 mile road marches with full Battle Rattle (About 200 lbs)of gear on.
Then go on to the range where they're given 50 rounds, to hit random pop up targets, 40 hits to center of mass is passing.
Forget Ft. Jackson they train OTG’s there (Other than Infantry )
4 posted on
03/16/2010 4:34:51 AM PDT by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: decimon
OK, where’s that M4 Chainsaw pic...
6 posted on
03/16/2010 4:40:57 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
(+)
To: decimon
In 1900 a soldier still wasn’t able to carry 200 rounds of ammo around with him. The idea of a bayonet on an M16 is pretty ridiculous.
9 posted on
03/16/2010 4:43:31 AM PDT by
wendy1946
To: decimon
10 posted on
03/16/2010 4:45:30 AM PDT by
4Speed
To: decimon
I did my basic training at Ft. Jackson in 1988. My AIT was at Ft. Gordon. I am with the poster who was surprised that most soldiers have never been in a fist fight. Where I grew up in Texas even the majority of the girls had been their fair share of scraps.
15 posted on
03/16/2010 4:52:15 AM PDT by
Bad Jack Bauer
(Fat and Bald? I was BORN fat and bald, thank you very much!)
To: decimon
OK, I learned in combat, OIF-2003, that you really do not run much, short sprints. We carried way to much gear and that really did make it hard to move fast and agile. So far I agree. However, I always fixed my bayonet..I was not issued one, but had my own...and found that most Iraqis found that more intimidating then anything else, and like a lot of things you'll never need it until you need it...sort of like a fire extinguisher. So, lose the stupid long runs and add more forced marches with combat load and add more training with the bayonet. Just my take
Cheers,
20 posted on
03/16/2010 5:07:31 AM PDT by
95B30
(Beer is proof that God loves us...)
To: decimon
bayonet drills
IMHO, that was the most worthless training I received in basic. I would have much rather spent that time on the rifle range or the obstacle course........
25 posted on
03/16/2010 5:13:51 AM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(My boomerang won't come back)
To: decimon
Damn...I *loved* those five mile runs.Particularly when it was 10 degrees outside (Ft Knox..coldest winter there in 50 years).
To: decimon
But how will they know what makes the grass grow?
40 posted on
03/16/2010 5:50:58 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: decimon
Bayonets are still useful. Like entrenching tools they aren’t issued to the troops mostly because the troops use them on each other...
...at least that’s the official thinking behind it.
42 posted on
03/16/2010 5:52:20 AM PDT by
exPBRrat
To: decimon
Just looked up MIL-STD-1366E...crew weight planning factor for crew of 4, including body weight plus basic load = 1,366 lbs. This works out to an average weight of about 342 lbs per soldier. Remember, this is based on the spectrum of soldier weights from 5th percentile female to 95th male.
Running the numbers from the mil-std, this works out to 147 lbs for clothing, equipment, existence load, and body armor. Subtracting these numbers from the planning factor, this works out to a body weight of 195 lbs.
Bottom line, 200 lbs of soldier load may be on the high side on average, but if you once in a while throw in a mortar base plate, rounds, etc...
44 posted on
03/16/2010 5:58:19 AM PDT by
Jonah Hex
("Never underestimate the hungover side of the Force.")
To: decimon
As a bonus, when they do away with DADT, they will all have fabulous abs.
To: decimon
Not to long before
Just Cause in Panama, we were told the days of the mass tactical parachute drop were a thing of the past.
Just before Desert Storm, there were many saying that the days of mass armor formations were over, and even that MBT's were obsolete.
Now we're saying that bayonet drills are unecessary. Even though they showed their tactical utility as recently as Korea (Lewis Millet / Bayonet Hill) and the Falklands (Mt. Tumbledown), IMHO, the most useful aspect of the bayonet is the psychological impact it has in training and the role it plays in building aggressiveness. As long as any hand-to-hand or CQB type training is considered worthwhile, it's IMHO, foolhardy to omit the bayonet.
52 posted on
03/16/2010 6:06:42 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: decimon
59 posted on
03/16/2010 6:25:05 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
(+)
To: decimon
I had heard that the Army was following in the footsteps of the Marines and SEAL's in adopting a variation of the
Crossfit regime.
62 posted on
03/16/2010 6:37:54 AM PDT by
SonOfDarkSkies
(I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself... - D.H. Lawrence)
To: decimon
No more morning jogs up Tank Hill?!
65 posted on
03/16/2010 7:29:08 AM PDT by
coop71
(Being a redhead means never having to say you're sorry...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson