Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TAITZ v OBAMA 15 REPLY to opposition-to-PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
scribd ^ | 03/11/2010 | Dr. Orly Taitz

Posted on 03/13/2010 7:42:43 AM PST by Elderberry

Motion for leave of court to add Ronald Machen, JR, US Attorney, Rudolph Contrehras, Assistant US Attorney, Alan Burch, Assistant US Attorney as additional defendants and add a Cause of Action for RICO-Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations as an Additional cause of action in the first Amended Complaint.

1. RICO One of the reasons for need for recusal of the US attorney's office, is a conflict of interest between the interests of the main client of the US Attorney's office-People of the United States of America and interests of the Defendant Barack Hussein Obama. The number one function of the US Attorney's office is to protect us, the public from criminal activity, violation of criminal statutes, fraud and treason. I have presented in my Quo Warranto complaint not only ample evidence of Barack Obama usurping the position of the President and Commander in Chief, but of him violating federal statutes, defrauding Social Security and engaging in identity theft in using social security number _4425. I have provided affidavits from licensed investigators, as well as an official Selective Service printout, showing him using this Social Security number, even though it was assigned to another individual, born in 1890 and assigned in CT between 1976-1977, while Obama resided in HI, and in light of the fact that Obama was never a resident of CT. This evidence is so overwhelming, that it doesn't even require additional investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: artbell; article2section1; awgeez; awgeezntsa; barack; barackobama; bauer; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; dnc; eligibility; holder; identityfraud; identitytheft; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; purgery; rico; taitz; tinfoilhat; usurper; whackamole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Elderberry

Terrific! Go Orly go!


41 posted on 03/13/2010 12:30:10 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I agree. It is not nice of her to figure “the one” is phony and a crook. Play nice like all the other attorneys and judges.


42 posted on 03/13/2010 1:13:43 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
Oh darn...Royce has not signed it? Bad dream.

The court just got it. The reply was "received" by the court on the 11th of March. See the Clerk's U.S. District Court date stamp in the lower left hand corner on page 1.

43 posted on 03/13/2010 1:17:01 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Well Obama has to keep winning every case, if even one of them gets to discovery he’s done.

Not only will he be done, but quite possibly the entire Democratic party will be annihilated root and branch.

Lawyers, however smart-alec, will never be trusted again, if not out right banned from political office by constitutional amendment.

Or the public may not be that gentle.

Once the Obots loose the Senate and House in November, much of Obama’s political protection will evaporate.

Then we will see the attitude of Judges change.


44 posted on 03/13/2010 1:47:28 PM PST by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: New Yawk Minute
You can ask any congressman or senator to provide you with his BC and they would be more than happy to do that.

Really? You've asked and they've provided?

Somehow I doubt that.

45 posted on 03/13/2010 1:55:06 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Oh well, I am sure the judge will find some reason why Obozo can use anyone’s SS # he wants. He has a lot of legal degrees.


46 posted on 03/13/2010 2:04:27 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

The judge hasn’t gotten around to it yet. It has only been 2 days since they received Taitz’s reply to the defendant’s motion. It will be a kick around here reading the Obot Taitz haters spew if this judge denies the Obama motion. ;-)


47 posted on 03/13/2010 2:30:05 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
Well Obama has to keep winning every case, if even one of them gets to discovery he’s done.

He's batting a thousand so far.

48 posted on 03/13/2010 2:55:50 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
I agree. It is not nice of her to figure “the one” is phony and a crook. Play nice like all the other attorneys and judges.

The woman is an absolute boob of an attorney. If this is your legal champion then God help you.

49 posted on 03/13/2010 2:57:03 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Of course he will deny it. Orly has already proven her case. Just ask her.

The only thing missing from that motion was the word, “Duh.”

Courts like it when you address them with scorching sarcasm.


50 posted on 03/13/2010 3:02:16 PM PST by MrRobertPlant2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Surely you have a stable of more competent attorneys. Where are they to let a Dentist, no less, handle the heavy lifting on this fraud? None of the wonderful ones (attorneys) have the fortitude for the work? God help you.


51 posted on 03/13/2010 3:05:05 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
Where are they to let a Dentist, no less, handle the heavy lifting on this fraud?

Because they're smart probably.

52 posted on 03/13/2010 3:08:55 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Yep.. The smart ones are in hiding.


53 posted on 03/13/2010 3:10:21 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
Yep.. The smart ones are in hiding.

Or they know a bogus issue when they see one.

54 posted on 03/13/2010 3:12:48 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“bogus” sums up the POTUS


55 posted on 03/13/2010 3:31:32 PM PST by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
“bogus” sums up the POTUS

In many ways it does.

56 posted on 03/13/2010 3:35:26 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Glad you got to see a copy of the long form. I did not see it posted. Link?


57 posted on 03/13/2010 3:45:10 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Name – OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN
Gender – Male
Street Address – 5046 S GREENWOOD AVE
City, State, Zip – CHICAGO IL 60615-2806
Probable Current Address – No
Telephone – 773-684-4809 – CST
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security – 042-68-xxxx
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased – No
Date Record Verified – Jun 05 – Apr 08

That data comes from Sankey’s searches on various databases.

Why dosn’t Obama have a Hawaii Social Security Number?

042 is a Connecticut prefix.

How is it possible that the US has a free press, and none of them think a POTUS using a dead person’s SS number is worth investigating?


58 posted on 03/13/2010 3:45:17 PM PST by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK

I have been told this is a bogus issue. Case closed. I guess we can start using dead people’s SS#s now.


59 posted on 03/13/2010 3:47:13 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
Why dosn’t Obama have a Hawaii Social Security Number?

When did he apply for one?

60 posted on 03/13/2010 3:48:07 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson