Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TAITZ v OBAMA 15 REPLY to opposition-to-PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
scribd ^ | 03/11/2010 | Dr. Orly Taitz

Posted on 03/13/2010 7:42:43 AM PST by Elderberry

Motion for leave of court to add Ronald Machen, JR, US Attorney, Rudolph Contrehras, Assistant US Attorney, Alan Burch, Assistant US Attorney as additional defendants and add a Cause of Action for RICO-Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations as an Additional cause of action in the first Amended Complaint.

1. RICO One of the reasons for need for recusal of the US attorney's office, is a conflict of interest between the interests of the main client of the US Attorney's office-People of the United States of America and interests of the Defendant Barack Hussein Obama. The number one function of the US Attorney's office is to protect us, the public from criminal activity, violation of criminal statutes, fraud and treason. I have presented in my Quo Warranto complaint not only ample evidence of Barack Obama usurping the position of the President and Commander in Chief, but of him violating federal statutes, defrauding Social Security and engaging in identity theft in using social security number _4425. I have provided affidavits from licensed investigators, as well as an official Selective Service printout, showing him using this Social Security number, even though it was assigned to another individual, born in 1890 and assigned in CT between 1976-1977, while Obama resided in HI, and in light of the fact that Obama was never a resident of CT. This evidence is so overwhelming, that it doesn't even require additional investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: artbell; article2section1; awgeez; awgeezntsa; barack; barackobama; bauer; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; dnc; eligibility; holder; identityfraud; identitytheft; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; purgery; rico; taitz; tinfoilhat; usurper; whackamole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
To: New Yawk Minute
The man should have never been allowed to run for president, without producing those documents.

He was required to produce the same documents every other candidate was required to show.

101 posted on 03/14/2010 8:23:35 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
What Orly doesn’t get is she thinks US Courts should be interested in the following:

1/ The truth

2/ Justice

3/ Upholding the US Constitution.

They are not.

Why don't you try learning Russian, a language with a different alphabet, and try to conduct a court case in Moscow.

You might make a few mistakes and get mocked as well.

I hope all the Legal elitists sneering end up like the CRU scientific “elite.”

Exposed as defenders of Lies.

102 posted on 03/14/2010 8:39:48 AM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
As for the “Birther” label, its not possible to prove which country Obama was born in. I meen actually physically born in, not the “flexible” Hawaii DOH version of virtual birth by a parent signing a piece of paper weeks later.

If Obama was born outside the country, what documentation did his mother use to bring him into the US?

As I understand it, travel records for Obama's mother can be disclosed because she is dead; have her passport records been requested?

103 posted on 03/14/2010 8:40:03 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
Obama is the First president to have an alien as a Father...

Nope, he's the second.

Chester Arthur's father didn't become a citizen until Chester was 14.

104 posted on 03/14/2010 8:44:25 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: BP2

105 posted on 03/14/2010 8:58:48 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom

I don’t know where Obama was physically born, I don’t think it can be proved unless Obama lets Hawaii DOH reveal every detail in full disclosure, and then only if the birth country turns out to be US/Hawaii.

Canada sometimes comes up because its close to Washington state. There are few checks on people crossing from Canada to the US today: perhaps none in 1961/2.

I don’t know if her passport records have been FOIA’ed in the US. In the UK you need to be a family member/have letter of permission from family to request that info, even if the subject is deceased.

There is a FOIA case, Obama v Allen I think, that asks for Barry Soetoro’s records, I am not sure if that case involves a request for passort records.

She may have travelled abroad on her husband’s passport with him, then returned with Baby Obama and just an letter from her husband explaining the situation.

That may have been enough to travel from Kenya (British Empire) to Canada (British Commonwealth). I can’t prove that.


106 posted on 03/14/2010 9:08:40 AM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom

Then Chester Arthur wasn’t technically eligible either, under Vattel’s NBC definition.

If we have proof of your statement about his father, then I stand corrected, and Obama would be the second Usurper.

That might also explain the bizarre reasoning in Wong Kim Ark [even though I think the bare verdict was clearly just] since Chester Arthur appointed one of the supreme court justices on that case.


107 posted on 03/14/2010 9:18:44 AM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; All

Actually on this particular thread it's Orly Taitz that we're speculating is “dumb” “stupid” or “crazy”. And given her antics I'd say we're on pretty firm ground.

Actually seeing how you Flat-Earther After-Birthers call EVERYBODY “dumb” “stupid” or “crazy” who questions Obama’s Eligibility — all while NEVER being critical of Obama or even entertaining that there's things about Obama that you DON'T know (because you don't know Obama personally) — only goes to show your partisanship, as well as your loyalty to Obama.

And given YOUR antics in supporting Obama, I'd say we're on pretty firm ground.



108 posted on 03/14/2010 9:19:04 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
Canada sometimes comes up because its close to Washington state. There are few checks on people crossing from Canada to the US today: perhaps none in 1961/2.

I don't know what Canada required, however the US did require either a birth certificate or passport to re-enter the country.

That may have been enough to travel from Kenya (British Empire) to Canada (British Commonwealth). I can’t prove that.

And to re-enter the US?

109 posted on 03/14/2010 9:23:02 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man; All


Re:


Bwa-ha-ha!!! Seeing how only TWO people have even seen your "evidence," you Flat-Earther After-Birthers just show your own gullibility and bias in believing anything originating from the hands of Barack Hussein Obama.

I'm sure you still believe in Global Warming, too! LOL



110 posted on 03/14/2010 9:31:39 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK

Can you imagine the State-run media, including: Dan Rather,
Katie Couric, Brian Williams, Barbara Walters, etc., if there was a question regarding whether or not G. W. Bush was eligible to POTUS? We would be getting updates on the news continuously regarding the status of the case and in-depth investigations by reporters. It is freaking amazing how things change when a D and a Socialist are sitting in the oval office.


111 posted on 03/14/2010 9:39:42 AM PDT by Mr. Wright ( in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
If there was no physical check done in 1961 on the US/Canada border, then she would have needed no documents whatsoever to re-enter the US.

Just get in a car and drive over.

That is just a theory, it can't be proved IMHO, not without Obama’s permission to release all the information from all authorities involved.

112 posted on 03/14/2010 9:46:12 AM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: plenipotentiary
On website Biography.com

"U.S. Senator, former 2008 Republican presidential candidate. Born John Sidney McCain III on August 29, 1936, at Coco Solo Naval Air Station in the Panama Canal Zone, the second of three children born to naval officer John S. McCain Jr. and his wife, Roberta. At the time of his birth, the McCain family was stationed in the Panama Canal Zone, under American control" _______________________________________________________

From The Fact Checker by Michael Dobbs in the Washington Post Feb 5, 2008

"The Facts

I dealt with the constitutional debate on whether McCain is a "natural born citizen" in a previous post. (According to the Constitution, only "natural born citizens" have the right to run for the presidency.") The senator bases his eligibility claim on the fact that he was (1) born on a military base in the Panama Canal Zone at a time when it was effectively under U.S. sovereignty and (2) both of his parents were U.S. citizens.

As I reported earlier, the McCain campaign has declined to publicly release the senator's birth certificate. But a senior campaign official showed me a copy of his birth certificate issued by the "family hospital" in the Coco Solo submarine base. (McCain's grandfather commanded the Coco Solo Naval Air Station in 1936; his father was the executive officer of a submarine based in Coco Solo.)

The birth certificate was signed by Captain W. L. Irvine. I have now checked that name against the Naval Register for 1936, and I find that William Lorne Irvine was director of the medical facility at the submarine base hospital in Coco Solo, Panama Canal Zone, during that time period. You can see the entry here. I think this effectively disposes of any remaining doubts that McCain was born inside the Canal Zone."

113 posted on 03/14/2010 10:17:00 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
Well, former squaddie, if one thing has been brought to light by all of this, it is that Chester A. Arthur (aka "Chet") was definitely a fraud and a phony, just like you-know-who.

In those less sophisticated days he managed to successfully obfuscate the facts that Pop Arthur was NOT a citizen, and that he (Chet), had apparently swapped papers with a dead brother who was born in Vermont.

A little retro-detective work had to be done, because Team Obama was floating the idea of using Old Chet as a precedent! However, if our Fearless Leader is telling the truth about who his bio-pa was, he has already admitted that he is ineligible because BHO, Sr., like Chet's dad, was not a citizen. He was here on a student visa issued, not by JFK's Admin, but by Good Old Ike's Foreign Student Program!

Sure, lots of folks back then were mighty suspicious, but Chet covered his tracks, paid off people right and left, placed friends in high places to block inquiries, and then on his deathbed, ordered all of his public records and private papers burned!

So yeah, your former fellow Subject of the Crown, is the second ineligible President. I think that will be shown, but only after his term is over. BHO, Jr. is quite a bit more audacious than old Chet, claiming that being born in Hawaii (which he really hasn't proven) is quite good enough to qualify him as an NBC, despite his papa's status as a Subject of the Crown.
IOW,BHO, Jr. tells us being a "Native," is the same, just as good really, as being a "Natural." Tricky bastard, ain't he?

Wonder if some Federal District Court, and then the SCOTUS, would care to get involved in that one? Ya think?

114 posted on 03/14/2010 10:41:33 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Obama? Definitely eligible to be Prime Minister of the UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: jamese777; New Yawk Minute
jamese777 has this link pasted all over his desktop for handy reach. No where in this article does anyone place Obama within the walls of Columbia. And there has not been one student that can remember him, including students that took the classes he claims to have taken.
115 posted on 03/14/2010 11:19:53 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/12/the-scoop-on-baskinrobbins-obamas-former-employee-in-honolulu-.html


116 posted on 03/14/2010 11:36:53 AM PDT by PwrPencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

jamese777 has this link pasted all over his desktop for handy reach. No where in this article does anyone place Obama within the walls of Columbia. And there has not been one student that can remember him, including students that took the classes he claims to have taken.


Search engines are our friends! They are convenient and they are quick. Get your mommy to help you and try one sometime!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2008-05-15-3144401415_x.htm


117 posted on 03/14/2010 11:44:28 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Did he work in Hawaii?

How would I know? Most middle class kids do, sometime before college, even if only the summer before. But in a tourist place like Hawaii, I'd imagine there were lots of things a high school student could work at.

So it is conceivable that Obama could have made it to his Columbia years without needing one.

I'd believe the Occidental days, but Columbia is really stretching credulity.

I haven't read his book, does he talk about any jobs? Or was he like Maynard G. Krebs(Bob Denver) , on the Dobie Gillis show, squeaking "werk!" at the very notion?

118 posted on 03/14/2010 11:51:13 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

I have done extensive research james and I have still yet to have been able to find ONE student that can place him in ONE class at Columbia. The link you sent me just adds to the fact that no one can place him there and if they were students they choose not to talk about it. And the picture at the head of said article has been proven to photo shopped.


119 posted on 03/14/2010 11:57:28 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: PwrPencil
According to this article in the L.A. Times Obama worked at a Baskin-Robbins in Honolulu:

The story, from Dec 2009 says about 30 years prior. Obama graduated from High School in 1979. So it appears he worked in Hawaii before going to Occidental. His SSN should have been issued based on a Hawaiian address. That would be one starting with 575 or 576.

120 posted on 03/14/2010 12:32:05 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson