uhhh no.
1 posted on
03/06/2010 5:15:34 PM PST by
Perdogg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Perdogg
To: Guenevere; SJSAMPLE; omega4179; Larry Lucido; fieldmarshaldj; Clemenza; buccaneer81; Impy; ...
3 posted on
03/06/2010 5:17:53 PM PST by
Perdogg
("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
To: Perdogg
4 posted on
03/06/2010 5:18:43 PM PST by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Perdogg
I don’t think shes pretty at all. She has that long square chin.
5 posted on
03/06/2010 5:19:08 PM PST by
beckysueb
(Scott Brown is a start. Lets keep it going.)
To: Perdogg
Are you kidding me? She is one step below Sarah Jessica Parker. How about a sexy wholesome woman instead?
6 posted on
03/06/2010 5:19:25 PM PST by
keving
(We get the government we vote for)
To: Perdogg
I take it this is a joke. Anniston specialize is slutty girl next door roles, not sultry, shapely vixens.
To: Perdogg
I love Jennifer Aniston but who is this Bond character?
8 posted on
03/06/2010 5:20:41 PM PST by
egannacht
(Inalienable rights granted by...)
To: Perdogg
Too old. Bring back Eva Green.
9 posted on
03/06/2010 5:21:04 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
To: Perdogg
Jennifer isn’t in the same league as most Bond Girls.
10 posted on
03/06/2010 5:21:27 PM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Perdogg
Sorry, Jen.
12 posted on
03/06/2010 5:21:54 PM PST by
Fintan
To: Perdogg
No way. About as dumb a move as casting Denise Richards.
To: Perdogg
I think Kim Kardashian is a knockout.
To: Perdogg
Wouldn’t touch her with a ten foot pole.
And seeing how she has trouble catching a man, let alone staying married, it looks as if most men have similar sentiments.
22 posted on
03/06/2010 5:25:17 PM PST by
DakotaGator
(Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
To: Perdogg
She’s gettin’ a little long in the tooth for that, isn’t she?
She just needs to get married, retire from it all, have a bunch of pretty babies and find out what life is REALLY all about. :)
24 posted on
03/06/2010 5:26:46 PM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save the Earth. It's the only planet with chocolate.)
To: Perdogg
38 posted on
03/06/2010 5:32:31 PM PST by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: Perdogg
I like James Bond movies, but Jennifer Anniston? Patricia Velasquez (the Mummy) would be a good candidate. She’s a knockout.
To: Perdogg
49 posted on
03/06/2010 5:37:12 PM PST by
egannacht
(Inalienable rights granted by...)
To: Perdogg
please... woof!!!
52 posted on
03/06/2010 5:39:47 PM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Perdogg
Jennifer Aniston was a hot little number about 15 years ago. Now, not so much. As for talent, well....
58 posted on
03/06/2010 5:43:29 PM PST by
Ouderkirk
(Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
To: Perdogg
No. First of all, Bond doesn’t go for the girl next door type. Second, she would be well over 40 by the time the film got shot. Third, and most important, is that Bond women are sharp and worldly. Aniston’s shtick is the ditz who doesn’t quick know her place in the world. A horrid choice.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
