Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not only did Obama not attend Columbia College...Harvard has no record of him either...nor Hawaii
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/court-grants-motion-for-leave-to-file.html ^ | 3-3-10 | medical

Posted on 03/03/2010 10:49:07 PM PST by capacommie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-324 next last
To: freespirited

Do you have a link to the New York Times article? Does it say there were two factions supporting two Jewish guys and they could’t break the tie, so Obama was a dark horse winner?


61 posted on 03/03/2010 11:36:22 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

I still think he’s a composite fake.


62 posted on 03/03/2010 11:37:06 PM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

No, they didn’t. Please point to me the specific post where someone ran the photos through detection software. In that thread, which I saw previously, there was simply conjecture, pretty poor at that as well.


63 posted on 03/03/2010 11:37:58 PM PST by Paradox (The Party of Know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Obama seems to have problems being photogenic.

It’s everywhere in his past.

It’s weird.


64 posted on 03/03/2010 11:38:30 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

You don’t have a premise. You’re a jackass.


65 posted on 03/03/2010 11:38:34 PM PST by streetpreacher (Arminian by birth, Calvinist by the grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: capacommie
I do not know what the source of the photo is but it looks phony. The BO body is all wrong for a seated position. It looks like a standing position photo somebody inserted . The right arm is at an impossible angle. The face photo was shot with a different lens than the surrounding people. Notice how flat the other faces are. This means they were shot with a long lens from a long distance. Typical for a large group shot. BO's face shows depth in the features - meaning shorter lens at closer distance.

The BO head and body also show depth. Not seen in the other people. This makes the BO head look large in comparision with the other folks. My guess is differnet lens and camera location.

66 posted on 03/03/2010 11:39:00 PM PST by Upstate NY Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
You gave a link and said “try to find a picture.” I did.

AN IMAGE OF THE GRADUATION GROUP. NOT SOME TWIT WITH A BACKDROP OF BOOKS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN ANYWHERE.

67 posted on 03/03/2010 11:39:29 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

I notice you didn’t react offensively to the Alex Jones label either. Truther as well?


68 posted on 03/03/2010 11:39:30 PM PST by streetpreacher (Arminian by birth, Calvinist by the grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

http://www.whale.to/b/nicoloff6.htmlj
this guy did one, I’ve seen others


69 posted on 03/03/2010 11:39:39 PM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: capacommie
Be wary of this sort of claim. These allegations feed into the “Wingnut” descriptions of eligibility questioners. The allegations were not by Apuzzo but by someone posting on the Apuzzo cite. Associating a careful and legitimate lawsuit with unsupported allegations has clearly been part of the Obama/Alinsky playbook. Perhaps a moderator would have been wise to block “Medical”, the source of the claim. No one said Obots were not clever propagandists.

Whether or not Obama was at Harvard, Columbia, Occidental, or who paid his bills is irrelevant. He was born to a non-citizen father and is thus ineligible. He can be senator, or hold virtually any office but the presidency. It is a sound protection of our liberties from someone about whose allegiances we don't know enough. All of his relatives were conveniently unavailable when he ran, his grandmother dying within days of the election. We need to focus on the one clear fact, clear because he told us, that his father was a British subject, and so was he.

Apuzzo is challenging congress and the VP for not performing their duty under the equal protection amendment. He and Donofrio have educated all of us about the incontrovertible fact of Obama’s alien father and how our founders explicitly forbade someone, whose parents were not both citizens, from becoming president. It didn't’ mean they couldn't run; Calero wasn't even a citizen, and McCain was born out of the country in Colon Panama. The mechanisms for validation were lacking, and the legislators who were asked to check, who checked thoroughly on McCain's eligibility and said, in effect, we think he should be eligible, but knew they hadn't the authority, failed to check on Obama.

70 posted on 03/03/2010 11:40:05 PM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Look at this photo. Notice any 'discrepancies'?

Yeah, now that you mention it, I do.

Obama is the only one with a shadow under his head/chin.

He also looks like he's holding a round ball, yet there's nothing but air under his hands and arms.

71 posted on 03/03/2010 11:40:17 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

I noticed you didn’t deny you were gullible and non-observant.

My premise again is, 1% fraud=100% fraud.
Yours is to give him a free pass.


72 posted on 03/03/2010 11:41:15 PM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

Link didnt work. I’m serious, I’ll consider the charges if I see some SERIOUS work on the photos, the kind of work that was done on the forged National Guard memos. There were a number of people that really, really took those memos apart. Experts in the field too.


73 posted on 03/03/2010 11:41:48 PM PST by Paradox (The Party of Know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

http://www.whale.to/b/nicoloff6.html


74 posted on 03/03/2010 11:42:33 PM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

be gone


75 posted on 03/03/2010 11:43:12 PM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Southack
0bama was born in Hawaii.

You have absolute proof of that? No one else does.

76 posted on 03/03/2010 11:44:14 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Your cap lock button is broken.


77 posted on 03/03/2010 11:44:37 PM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: capacommie
"Premise: One photoshopped pic means they’re all fake, and that one with the baton sticking up from the ground, is a fake."

Don't misread this - I want this fraud exposed - but this is not the way to do it.

What you just posted is what's called a "Some=All Fallacy."

It's just about the most basic mistake you can make in logical discourse.

Be careful, and do the legwork - first.
78 posted on 03/03/2010 11:47:08 PM PST by shibumi ("..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Yeah, no kidding. There are a whole lot of documents missing from 0bama’s history.

Doesn’t do us any good, though. Without physical evidence that conflicts with his story, we’ve got 0 chance at swaying public perception of his background.

Worse, nutcases claiming that he didn’t go to Harvard make our job even more difficult.


79 posted on 03/03/2010 11:47:16 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Southack

One fraudulent picture, document (check) =100% fraud


80 posted on 03/03/2010 11:48:26 PM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson