Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vincent Van Gogh Painting Authenticated by Art Experts
discovery ^ | Arthur Max

Posted on 02/26/2010 2:17:41 PM PST by JoeProBono

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: KTM rider
Interesting. This rates with me


21 posted on 02/26/2010 3:18:09 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; devolve

Reping to Van Gogh


22 posted on 02/26/2010 6:12:07 PM PST by potlatch (- What a co-inky-stink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Authenticated and finally accepted by critics

Years after the owner died


23 posted on 02/26/2010 6:21:03 PM PST by devolve ( . . . . . . . . . Hussein Junior-Rigging the USA in any which way possible . . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: devolve

At least it is realistic looking. Starry Night never impressed me, sad to say.


24 posted on 02/26/2010 6:24:32 PM PST by potlatch (- What a co-inky-stink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Here's another one of a windmill. Totally different color palette.

And another one. The faces are featureless, as in the newly-authenticated one.

Here's the EXACT same scene as the new one. Again, different color palette. The new one just doesn't look like a Van Gogh color palette to me.

All of the paintings I'm looking at are from 1886, the year the authenticator says the new one is from. Perhaps Van Gogh and a fellow artist went out painting one day, and painted the same scene. Or, he and another artist painted the same scene separately. As much as I like the painting, it just doesn't look like Van Gogh's color palette to me.

I've seen these authenticators make mistakes before.

And when did Van Gogh ever paint women's dresses that way? And why isn't the painting signed? Just because it's stamped from an art store that Van Gogh went to, and it uses some of the same pigments - that doesn't necessarily mean it's by Van Gogh. More likely, a fellow artist.

Read his biography, what he was doing in 1886. He was working with a group of artists. The painting is more than likely the work of one of them.

25 posted on 02/26/2010 7:02:02 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!! The Totalitarians are in charge!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Spacey Spacey Night?


26 posted on 02/26/2010 7:15:23 PM PST by devolve ( . . . . . . . . . Hussein Junior-Rigging the USA in any which way possible . . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: devolve
I like space graphics, as you know.
I'm not fond of abstracts, I go for reality. Spent much time on my oil paintings, actually trying for ‘too much’ detail.
27 posted on 02/26/2010 7:35:20 PM PST by potlatch (- What a co-inky-stink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Too many brush strokes painting a rose?


28 posted on 02/26/2010 7:44:17 PM PST by devolve ( . . . . . . . . . Hussein Junior-Rigging the USA in any which way possible . . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: devolve
[Too many brush strokes painting a rose?]

Shoot, I'd try to show the veins in a leaf, lolol.
I evolved and there are tricks. You can make bark on a tree using a pallet knife.

Someone commented on the heavy 3-D look of some blossoms. Heavy paint in areas is effective, but oil paint takes forever to dry.

I gave away my wooden paint box and all the stuff to my grandaughter!!

29 posted on 02/26/2010 7:49:47 PM PST by potlatch (- What a co-inky-stink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

LOL!

No hoarding of stuff you do not use?


30 posted on 02/26/2010 7:54:21 PM PST by devolve ( . . . . . . . . . Hussein Junior-Rigging the USA in any which way possible . . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Hadn’t painted in years since I discovered the computer and computer graphics.

Ummm, yeah, I hoard clothes, shoes, women’s stuff, lol. But plenty of space to do it in.


31 posted on 02/26/2010 7:58:15 PM PST by potlatch (- What a co-inky-stink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Check out this photograph. It's a group shot of dozens of artists at the Cormon atelier. (Fernand Cormon's school/workshop/studio.)

See if you can find Van Gogh among the dozens of artists.

I think it was one of these other artists who painted the painting that has been ascribed to Van Gogh. Because, really, when did you ever see Van Gogh paint women's dresses so colorfully, and with such a light touch?

32 posted on 02/27/2010 10:55:00 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!! The Totalitarians are in charge!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp


33 posted on 02/27/2010 11:13:52 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Not the same. It's got that heavy air about it. And it's over-wrought. The new one's dresses are very impressionistic, especially the dress in the foreground, with the red bow and red paint lines. And the light blue and yellow dresses. Pastels? It just doesn't say Van Gogh to me.

The only thing that gives me pause are the featureless faces. There is also a similarity of the windmill itself, to his other windmill paintings.

I'm still looking, though - trying to find out who it could be. It might be an unknown - one of those men at the atelier.

If you lay out all his paintings, in a row, chronologically - this one would come as a surprise.

I'm also wondering why Van Gogh didn't sign this painting? And if he signed all his others?

34 posted on 02/28/2010 9:52:14 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!! The Totalitarians are in charge!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

A starry night is Van Gogh’s most famous and over rated painting.


35 posted on 02/28/2010 9:54:43 AM PST by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Louis van Tilborgh, curator of research at the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam, said the painting was unusual for the 19th century impressionist, depicting large human figures in a landscape.

I just noticed that the curator himself thinks the painting was unusual for a Van Gogh.

I would like to know what markers they used to authenticate it, other than the art store stamp and the pigments. What about stylistic markers?

36 posted on 02/28/2010 9:56:40 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!! The Totalitarians are in charge!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

About the Cormon atelier photo, I'm trying to find out who some of the artists are.

I see Cormon himself, at the easel. Van Gogh is NOT the one crouching in front of Cormon with an easel, contrary to what another internetter thinks. If you follow a straight line from Cormon's head, Van Gogh is 3 heads behind him (with a long space between Van Gogh and the person in front of him). I also see Toulouse-Lautrec, right in the front with a bowler hat. As a comparison, see this [one photo contains nudity - NOT safe for work - scroll down to see Toulouse-Lautrec - don't click if you're offended by nudity].

If anyone has any ideas on who some of the others might be...

37 posted on 02/28/2010 10:21:58 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!! The Totalitarians are in charge!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

Do you paint?


38 posted on 02/28/2010 11:15:42 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

No, I have an art history background. Hope I’m not annoying you with my posts. My only connection with Van Gogh is that I enjoy a lot of his work, and I’ve read all of his letters. It annoys me when people “authenticate” things innacurately. I read last year that an authenticator identified someone in a photograph (it’s in one of my dead computers, and I can’t remember who it was) and it clearly was not the person.


39 posted on 02/28/2010 11:41:24 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!! The Totalitarians are in charge!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

Not at all. I enjoy your posts.
I paint and when one compares my early and later “works” the differences can be profound. Some I signed and some I didn’t. ;-{)


40 posted on 02/28/2010 11:50:32 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson