Posted on 02/22/2010 8:25:49 AM PST by capacommie
Nothing about him is as he says. And it does not matter about his past. He's systematically destroying America, and the Constitution and imposing communism at a mind-numbing pace. His constructors effed up in making his fake daddy Kenyan, making him ineligible.
Don't believe anything but what you see. TREASON is the rule of the day with BHO and his phony corrupt illegal illegitimate administration. Reality and the present-tense, it's all we have to go on for now.
Hawaii is corrupt. Stanley Ann aint his mom. BHO,Sr. aint his dad. Every fricking photo of his history is "shooped"
He looks closest to being a Papuan, but who knows where he came from? Only upper upper crust wealthy elite kids get in to Punahau. Not a BHO. Those pix are shooped. He never went to Columbia. His Hahvahd pix are shooped.
That said, I think Americans will call for Obama's head on a pike if he tries any martial law crap.
Notice how O's right arm is absolutely identical to grandma's right arm. It would have to be for the cut & paste (pre-photoshop lingo) to work. The shadows between O's left leg and granny's right are interesting. He really looks dropped into that photo, doesn't he?
he WAS dropped in to that central park photo
people KNOW that bench it and its backdrop do not match, the photo is tilted, grandpa’s arm diverges
ugh
and that group African photo like many of o’s faked shots always uses a hand on a shoulder cover
I never noticed the 2nd guy from the right before, he was photoshopped in very badly...
Who did the analysis on those photos? The reason I ask - I have taken photos on more than on occasion that one could swear were photoshopped. But are the real original photos.
We have many pictures in old family photos that, by your eyes, would be considered photoshopped (where did you get “shooped”?). Light and cameras, both old film cameras and even today’s digital sometimes capture funny tricks of light.
And I am in NO way defending The One - AKA - 0bama. He is a complete fake. But I see no proof that he didn’t attend Columbia (I suspect he was not a stand-out student, possibly even poorer than other figures who have been ridiculed for being mediocre). I suspect his records also indicated a very radical association - and maybe some pretty damning actions or troubles.
Thus the reason his academic records, as well as nearly every detail of his life is under lockdown. Funny how we knew GW’s college record before he even got elected. How we saw complete records of his military service (including the shenanigans over his service times/flying hours/service to different units). Yet Dem politicians seem immune. I remember the cries for Kerry’s records to be released - no dice.
Obama officially released copies of a Hawaii-issued Certificate of Birth - that was so easily proven to be a fake that they should have been embarrassed and discredited completely at a minimum, and arrested for document fraud would have actually been appropriate.
There IS a massive cover-up and agenda. No tin-foil required. BUT...
Making claims with very questionable evidence is no better than the Obama camp’s weak manufactured evidence supporting him. And as others have mentioned, making such radical statements without some more convincing evidence just weakens our argument, even if your statements are actually correct...
None of the images you posted have convincing evidence of being manipulated. Some are a bit strange. But what are your sources? Images posted on the ‘net have gone through generations of minor changes due to the nature of data transmission, cropping, changing resolution for the web, etc. Every time a photo (especially .jpg) is saved in any form - it looses quality. I download an image, then blow it up to try to see detail - and then save the image... I have introduced artifacts to the photo. Have I “changed” it - no. But details to get changed by the jpg compression. If I then re-size that image back to original size - again, even without making any intentional changes, then save it - more compression noise is added. I upload it to a web site - then you see the photo on your screen - what you have in front of you may show some signs of change from what it originally looked like.
Definitely, I wish I could find that pi, it's been posted here several times.
O really looks pasted into that photo. Notice how his left hand grasps the shoulder of the woman seated in front of him in a pretty natural way. His right hand . . . not so much. The whole weirdly contrived pose is enough to make me say fake.
and look at bho’s head, it doesn’t even match his neck
he must have a tinfoil neck?
No, if you look closely, you can see his arm. But that's an awful lot of black shadow in that one area of the photo. It looks like a combination of shadow and sleeve flare. And the guy's (2nd from right) left shoulder looks odd. Also, the guy on the right, what's that white shaft coming down from his right arm? Is it one of the argyle diamonds? And the woman on the right, what's that pink shaft coming down from behind her left ear?
Not to mention, his head seems disjointed from his neck.
It can not be entered willy nilly. I takes commitment and endurance as well as preparation.
God help us in our day, in Jesus name, amen.
argue the rest, that ulnar joint is all wrong
and ONE pshop means ALL fake
that’s closer to a real picture than the one where he’s sitting in the middle
The crowd is turned to watch the next graduate (perhaps someone more popular than Barry) walk out on the stage from the opposite end - typicle commencement stuff. I agree that it looks odd, but I do think that Occam's Razor applies here.
The voters keep telling him "NO" and he just ignores them. That can't help but p!ss off a lot of folks. I think that's why his Rasmussen rating is holding at -19.
his job is not to represent us, pffft what a joke!
I think so too.
Occam’s Photoshop Razor?
look at the girl right behind his hand, all the rest of the crowd has a yellow/red-light hue and she is all washed out blonde hair bright white dress...=wrong!
his hand is a lobster claw
the background is too flat, like a projection
remember, even ONE photoshopped change = 100% fake
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.