Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
The Obama File ^ | Feb 1, 2010 | The Obama File

Posted on 02/01/2010 2:35:11 PM PST by opentalk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: opentalk


21 posted on 02/01/2010 2:57:25 PM PST by Diogenesis ( Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Actually, I’m not even surprised by this.


22 posted on 02/01/2010 2:57:34 PM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
How many names are there for Jesus?

About 100

Since Barack Obama is even greater, how can we begrudge him a couple dozen Social Security Numbers?

So true. I mean he is a "Attuned Being" "Light worker" "The ONE we have been waiting for" "Healer of the Planet" just to name a few.

23 posted on 02/01/2010 2:58:36 PM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Shout it from the roof tops!!!

btw..Ive only ever needed one SSN. WTF?

24 posted on 02/01/2010 3:02:31 PM PST by Delta 21 (If you cant tell if I'm being sarcastic...maybe I'm not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip; supremedoctrine
From another thread , this SS number was used to sucessfully pull up Obamas Selective service number.

The Barack Obama Nationality Question Heats Up post #111 by supremedoctrine

#111 That social security number 042-68-4425 I just filled in on the Selective Service Registration site: I used the last name Obama, rather than Soetoro. His date of birth was August 4 1961. Under Soetoro, there was no match. Under Obama, it did give me the match and produced the registration number 61-1125539-1.I’m sure you know all this. I’m also sure you know the SS numbers weren’t in existence until the mid 1930s, so I assume if, as Orly Taitz said, that number was assigned to someone born in 1890 in Connecticut, it would be a retroactive assignation, which, I guess, is the most likely explanation. I myself have just verified that yes, at least the first five numbers indicate Connecticut. But I don’t know how to research the 1890 part.

25 posted on 02/01/2010 3:07:38 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: willgolfforfood

You may not be surprised. But, If you really think about the scale of the fraud perpetrated on us... I mean the RNC must be involved, and certainly the DNC, Senators, the FBI, etc. No way this guy becomes president with a phony SSN without massive fraud on both sides of the isle, and with support of the permanent bureaucracy. The scale is so huge that it defys imagination. So I am torn between sweeping this aside as ridiculous pap or accepting a really huge and comprehensive conspiracy that shakes to the core... What say you?


26 posted on 02/01/2010 3:07:53 PM PST by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
You don't really think the Secret Service would make it easy for people to get the president's social security number, do you?

Wouldn't it be a good bet that if there were social security numbers assigned to a Barack Obama in Utah, Colorado, Georgia and South Carolina, that whatever fraud is going on, it's probably not done by the guy in the White House?

The people who make this claim tell us that there are other numbers out there for a "Barack Obama" spelled different ways that they don't credit to Obama.

Isn't it likely that a lot of the numbers they claim to have found tied to the correctly spelled Obama name may likewise belong to other fraudsters?

Assuming that is that the government hasn't just created this whole controversy to play with our heads.

27 posted on 02/01/2010 3:14:41 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
re: none of which were issued in Hawaii, which in itself is an evidence of foreign birth

I don't think they were issuing SS numbers at birth when he was born in the early 60’s. In those days you applied for it when you went to work. It wasn't until later they started issuing one when you were born.

28 posted on 02/01/2010 3:21:10 PM PST by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

4 Later


29 posted on 02/01/2010 3:24:23 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x
Put this into the context of a hidden background , you have to wonder. I am glad they are digging. It is not normal for the prez of the US to hide his background, The whole thing smells. I hope the heat gets turned up.
30 posted on 02/01/2010 3:25:51 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

“But I don’t know how to research the 1890 part.”

I once found a form letter from the Fed Gubment, informing the recipient all the benefits she was missing out on by not having a SSN. This was from the 40’s. So, there must have been a push for people to get numbers.

I myself (born in 1970) did not get one until I turned 18 (to register for selective service).


31 posted on 02/01/2010 3:26:31 PM PST by lacrew (Barack Obama is always the least experienced most condescending guy in the room. (Rush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
Hillary didn't know?

THOUSANDS of reporters that covered the campaign and the election either a little or a lot didn't know? Or didn't even ask?

32 posted on 02/01/2010 3:27:03 PM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

WAIT! Social security numbers weren’t started till 1936 according to Wiki. So what h’ is going on with the author talking about 1890? Help?


33 posted on 02/01/2010 3:27:36 PM PST by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Doulos1

1890 = The person was born in 1890, and if issued a SSN in 1936 - they would be 46 at the time)


34 posted on 02/01/2010 3:31:39 PM PST by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: camerongood210

yes


35 posted on 02/01/2010 3:33:55 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

In the 70’s you could get a SSAN for a baby...it was helpful when setting up a bank college fund for the future. So maybe babies could get a SSAN if the parents applied for one. On various blogs I have read obama’s mother, Stanley Ann, had a bunch of different SSAN’s, too. And other blogs say usually that can be an indication they work for the CIA. Maybe Ron Paul is right...maybe it IS a CIA coup???


36 posted on 02/01/2010 3:34:36 PM PST by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Popman

“The ONE we have been waiting for”

“I sm the one you warned me of” - Blue Oyster Cult


37 posted on 02/01/2010 3:35:13 PM PST by Fred Hayek (From this point forward the Democratic Party will be referred to as the Communist Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

HMMMMMMMM.........120 years old? The only person alive at that age is Charles Montgomery Burns. The pieces are starting to fall into place.....
Curious, very curious!


38 posted on 02/01/2010 3:36:47 PM PST by Don@VB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: camerongood210

What is the legal recourse?


39 posted on 02/01/2010 3:46:27 PM PST by camerongood210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: willgolfforfood

You would think the Clintons would gone after this issue. The reporters, well maybe they didn’t ask. After all Obama is a United States Senator and presumably has already been vetted by the FBI just to get a security clearance. I assume that all Senators get some sort of security clearance?


40 posted on 02/01/2010 3:47:53 PM PST by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson