Posted on 01/07/2010 6:52:08 PM PST by myknowledge
PR campaigns, you mean like Hollywood, mainstream press, Liberalism, Ecotopia and on and on that have brainwashed into believing we can’t kill any whales? They are overfeeding on krill to the point of starving other species.
You still can’t kill seals even though they are damaging the salmon populations. Time to stop the Hug the Whales nonsense and manage these populations.
Pray for America’s FReedom
Now they need to sink the rest of their fleet and leave the ecoterrorists for the ssharks to feed on!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humpback_whale
Stop listening to liberals.
Wikipedia should NEVER be quoted on FR. It is an inaccurate website run by left wing whackjobs. I don't have the exact info but a global warming freak posted over 2000 posts saying global warming was real and banned users who disagreed with him. Using Wikipedia is dumb, this isn't a liberal / conservative issue. It's a right / wrong issue.
You can lump me in with the dumbocrats if you want, but your opinion means nothing to me.
So, what makes whales more special than cows, to the point they can’t be harvested in your mind?
I can understand this if you are a vegan, but otherwise, you have no basis for any of your words.
Did you get your MBA from the U of I in Urbana?
Tastes like chicken! ;-)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! I hope they caught it on film. I’d pay a few bucks to see a recording of it!!!
In fact, they may be on the brink of overpopulation.
******
The same ecocrazies who want to stop whaling claim that Global Warming is reducing the availability of krill in the Southern Oceans - the food of whales.
So some harvested whales should help the krill population, shouldn’t it!!!
Paul Watson is an absolute egomaniac with a God complex.
Have you ever seen a whale in person?
Okay, there were only 100,000 smart buffalo on the North American continent.
What's your point?
LOL! That’s mean!
No, but if it is like looking at a cow, pig, chicken, etc., I can promise you that upon seeing it, I would be for slaughtering it.
Then you have no proof of your lies. Thank you.
The Ady Gil altered it speed which puts it at fault.
“The Ady Gil was the stand on vessel as the Japanese vessel was crossing on the Ady Gils port side. The Japanese vessel was the give way vessel and should of either stopped or passed on the Ady Gils stern.”
While this is true, having the right of way does not give you to demand the right of way if it will cause a collision. if the Ady gill did not accelerate that would not have been a collision.
The Ady Gil altered it speed which puts it at fault.
“The Ady Gil was the stand on vessel as the Japanese vessel was crossing on the Ady Gils port side. The Japanese vessel was the give way vessel and should of either stopped or passed on the Ady Gils stern.”
While this is true, having the right of way does not give you to demand the right of way if it will cause a collision. if the Ady gill did not accelerate that would not have been a collision.
So, BBC says they are not endangered, Wikipedia says they are not endangered, IWC says they are not endangered BUT Dengar01 knows better?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.