Now proceed to the section of the story under the subtitle "Bombs' Damage Freakish" and read the strained excuse-making for the Russian aviators who have a "propensity" to "hit working class areas, hospitals, orphanages, and the like". According to the New York Times story it's "ironical" (sic) because the purpose of the Russian war on Finland is "freeing the workers".
Even if the Soviet aviator flying over a Finnish city is the most devoted friend of the working class, he cannot tell the difference between the "exploiter" and the "proletarian" on the ground.
And besides, the Finns have some pretty good anti-aircraft weapons and this forces the Russian bombers to fly higher, making them less accurate. So, see? It's the Finns' own fault.
Even 70 years ago the NY Times was as much an active agent for communism as it is today.
Northern Karelia: the North Karelian Group completes its offensive in the Pielisjärvi sector after two days, having forced the opposing Russian regiment back across the border.
Photo: SA-KUVA
Uruguay to aid Finland