Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Sounds like another example of imposing modern angst and mores on the past. I was a bit turned off by the previews and this just confirms it. I found this on another review:

Great, energetic fun! Guy Ritchie is back and delivers a strong, gay romance. McAdams and Reilly are in the way of the “bromance”. Entire production excellent.

http://reelrave.com/review/240

Maybe the movie should be retitled "Brokeback Victorian London".

1 posted on 12/15/2009 9:10:59 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Didn’t know Keith was into the Opium like Captain Basil.


2 posted on 12/15/2009 9:12:35 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

My understanding is that he original Sherlock Holmes character was a frequent drug user. I think House MD is roughly based on Holmes’ character.

SnakeDoc


3 posted on 12/15/2009 9:15:05 AM PST by SnakeDoctor ("Talk low, talk slow, and don't say too much." -- John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

As much as I am looking forward to this movie, I still think no one can do Holmes like Jeremy Brett could.


4 posted on 12/15/2009 9:15:29 AM PST by stuartcr (If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

ping


5 posted on 12/15/2009 9:16:35 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

why??

Why do they have to do this?

Why not call him something else? Why use the Sherlock Holmes name on this dreck?


6 posted on 12/15/2009 9:16:59 AM PST by GeronL (Join the Palin Beer Summit Putsch!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Saw the previews last night on the Terminator Salvation DVD and I thought it looked pretty good.

Guy Ritchie hadn't made a decent film the whole time he was married to Madonna. Hopefully now that they're divorced, she no longer sucks the creative energy from him and this one will return to the entertaining level of Lock, Stock... and Snatch.

10 posted on 12/15/2009 9:22:07 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I think I will ... stick with the books, thanks.


13 posted on 12/15/2009 9:28:57 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I, for one, can’t wait to Miss it!!!


15 posted on 12/15/2009 9:29:31 AM PST by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Why can't FReepers just enjoy a fricking movie without whining about how gay it is or how leftist it is. Are you going to become indoctrinated after viewing it? How fun would the movie be without the drug usage, the narcissist behavior from Holmes, and the fighting? Holmes was a brawler, he had bad habits and hygiene, and Watson was his right-hand man, so the movie isn't a far departure from Arthur Doyle's original short stories.

People really believe that the 1800s was an idyllic, magical conservative time. Nothing could be further from the truth. The period had just as much homosexuality, prostitution, crime, and drug abuse as now.

23 posted on 12/15/2009 9:44:18 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (10 YEARS OF FREEPING! HAPPY ANNIVERSARY EEE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Gay Richie, Robert Downey and Jude law.... what a crock!

I'll stick with Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce.

24 posted on 12/15/2009 9:47:34 AM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

It’s the action sequences that are probably going to keep me away from this movie. Holmes as a druggie is actually from the books, and his relationships were weird in the books too. But those big fight scenes are just outside the realm of Holmes.


27 posted on 12/15/2009 9:49:16 AM PST by discostu (The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Posting two weeks later, after having gone and seen the movie: I can only figure the reviewer was aiming to sabotage this Sherlock Holmes movie by saying it is a "strong gay romance." That is a downright lie on the part of whoever wrote it, and because I believed it (at first) I darned near missed what turned out to be one of the best movies I've seen in a long time. It had a good message and emphasized the right values. To wit: There's a storm coming; stay cool and deal with it.

The movie "Sherlock Holmes" is straight entertainment and worth seeing -- the only people upset will be Sherlock Holmes purists. The overall story and moral is very true to the spirit of Conan Doyle's Holmes stories (I've read them all many times), though it is racy in a way that would have repulsed the old Victorian. Yet even the raciness in this movie is done with light and nicely done humor.

I recommend the movie.

54 posted on 01/03/2010 4:48:40 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

So, do they portray Holmes and Watson as gay?


55 posted on 01/08/2010 12:46:57 PM PST by Lucky9teen (A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is just putting on its shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson