iPodTouch, the next generation of iPhone users...
I am literally attached to my iTouch, or I guess the other way around. It goes where I go. With it, I have my podcasts, music, games, internet, various applications for bank accounts, etc. It is awesome. I can see how it easy it would be to transition to an iPhone from here so i could use it everywhere, whereas now I am dependent on wifi.
Bought a iPod Touch 2G last January. It’s the coolist thing I’ve ever owned.
Just got a 32GB iPod Touch in October. Incredible little machine that I am amazed by everyday. I’ve got all my music on it, plus it is like having a little computer in your pocket with all the apps and internet capability. I can read FR anywhere in my house now. It’s also the first Apple product I’ve ever owned.
When is the next version expected?
Help! I use computers which are connected by hard wire to the Internet. I use cell phones and do not subscribe to texting because I don’t waNt to pay extra and none of my friends text. I was forced to get a camera with my last phone, but I don’t know how to download the pictures to anything! I use email and never Tweet or use Facebook. I am hopelessly out of date.
At least I’m not on dial up any more.
By Om Malik
December 6, 2009
As the competition for smartphone domination starts to heat up, it is becoming increasingly clear that the iPod touch is Apples ace up its sleeve, and according to a report by Flurry, a San Francisco-based mobile analytics company, 24 million iPod touches represent about 40 percent of the total 58 million iPhone OS devices.
From the time I first laid my hands on the iPod touch, I have been a big fan of it after all, it is just like an iPhone except that it has more storage, is skinnier, and has none of the hassles of dropped calls.
It is a handy little touch computer, that allows you to quickly check emails when sitting in a nice comfortable chair and reading a book. It allows me to play a game of MLB World Series, control my favorite music system the Sonos manage the Apple TV, and very soon, people will be able to use it to accept credit cards.
OK, so what if it doesnt make phone calls or have 3G connectivity? Those are problems you can fix by buying a MiFi and getting connected to Verizons 3G network, and you can make Skype calls as well. Last January (wow, how time flies) I wrote about why Apple was going to rule the mobile web, thanks to the iPod touch. I wasnt that off the mark.
AdMob, a mobile advertising company currently being acquired by Google, in a recent report said that during the month of October (on a worldwide basis) the iPod touch accounted for 9.8 percent of all requests for applications and web sites that embed AdMobs advertising script. In comparison, the iPhone has 22.4 percent of all requests. For the U.S. market, the iPod touch brought in 11.4 percent of total requests compared with 24 percent of requests emanating from the iPhone.
AdMobs numbers mirror the data collected by Flurry, which tracks 3,000 applications, 45 million consumers and four platforms. In terms of the total number of user sessions per month, at present, iPod touch usage is much higher than the Android-based user sessions and is giving the iPhone a run for its money.
Its important to remember that the iPhones flank is protected by an often overlooked, powerful fighting brand: iPod touch, Flurry notes in a report likely to be released Monday. As all industry eyes look to the iPhone, the iPod touch is quietly building a loyal base among the next generation of iPhone users, positioning Apple to corner the smartphone market not only today, but also tomorrow.
Agreed. In a post earlier this year I wrote how the emergence of the iPod touch/iPhone is changing how we perceive and interact with computers. My friend Antonio Rodriguez, who founded and sold his startup Tabblo to Hewlett-Packard, thinks that a whole generation of kids is now growing up with keyboard-less computing as a default way to interact with machines.
The iPod touch is much more than the iPhones little brother, as Jordan Golson recently pointed out:
Apple is perpetuating a virtuous cycle, as Gene Munster put it in a recent research note, to keep users on the iPod touch an improved version of the lock-in provided by the old iTunes/iPod music ecosystem. Users buy the iPod touch; download apps; developers promote their apps (and the iPod touch platform), which leads to more consumers buying the iPod touch.
This virtuous cycle is more pronounced in the case of social networks and games. In its soon to be just released November Pulse report , Flurry notes:
Empirically, Flurry compared how iPod touch session usage has changed over the last six months across key application categories important to this demographic; namely, Social Networking and Games. While Social Networkings viral nature is understood, iPhone Games have become increasingly social with the inclusion of features like friends lists, leader boards and remote multi-player modes. Together, Social Networking and Games category usage reflects the strength of the iPod touch Generations influence among its peers.
It is hardly a surprise. Apple changed its tune and started touting the iPod touch as a gaming device, which has started to have a negative impact on the earnings of specialist game device makers such as Nintendo.
It is starting to make its presence felt in the e-reader business. It is already a travel planner, thanks to apps like TripIt. So whats next? (Related post: The Past, Present & Future of Mobile Games. On GigaOM Pro: Is There Any Demand for a True Gaming Phone? (subscription required)).
I think a digital camera would be a welcome addition, for that would allow the iPod touch to take on new roles: that of a camera. Secondly, it could become an easy-to-use and cheap bar code scanner. The latter would be the first of the many offerings for the iPod touch to disrupt a business described as enterprise mobility and dominated by Motorolas Symbol Technologies.
It is not as far-fetched an idea as you might think. Square is already building a card reader. Last week, when I went to Apples Palo Alto, Calif., store, I saw the salespeople using a new device instead of the typical handheld credit card terminals. They were a combination of an iPod touch/iPhone (I couldnt tell) and a sheath that snugly wrapped around the device and plugged into its connector, making it a point-of-sale device. And thats just the start.
Against such a backdrop, it isnt wrong to say: All hail the iPod touch.
however, if you dont have access to wi-fi, it's basically just an ipod.
Analysis: Apple Embraces The Cloud, Positions Mobile With Lala Deal [Extends iTunes]
[ a FReeper article... ]
Sold me, but I think I’ll wait for the camera and the FM tuner.
We’re testing a couple of SIP apps to see if we can use our iPods as Cisco VOIP phones. So far, not as bad as I expected.
My favorite thing about is how I can just turn it on in under 30 seconds and check my e-mail, and not even have to leave my bed, whereas before, I would have to wait minutes for my 4-year-old laptop to start up.
Mr? I prefer my iPhone...
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
The company to watch next is... Acer, already huge in smart phones outside of US. I’ve just read an article about them somewhere, Forbes, or WSJ, and they’re ready to jump into the fray. They’ve got excellent products.
I love my Touch. The things it can do are astounding. I agree, it definitely needs a camera (even though I can use it as a level or a ruler, or get the latest weather, or surf the web, or email, or play Uno, or check the stock market, or translate a sentence into French, or get directions to a restaurant).
Ignoring the foundation of the product makes one look a bit less than intelligent.
The majority of iPhone buyers want a smartphone-class device. Does it make any more sense to buy an iPod touch, then go over to the Verison store and dish out $199 For a Droid? Or to Sprint for a Pre? Regardless, you are saddled with a 2 year-commitment (unless you pay full-retail) for service+data. the iPhone serves the purpose of multiple devices - smartphone and mp3/video/game-entertainment device.
Don't have a need for a mobile phone, or already have a phone that you are content with? Then sure, get you an iPod touch. I think that is exactly what Apple was thinking by making two nearly identical products - one with phone and camera - and one without.
So where is this new revelation the author seems to think he has found?