Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
he occupies two seats worth of space, and the airline should charge him accordingly without anybody yelling at the airline.

I agree. Wasn't that simple? :0)

But the predominant emotion is less flattering and I maintain that *because* you are right that large people cost more to transport and take up more space it is the AIRLINE's responsibility to either charge more or change accomodations so that all their paying customers are satisfied.

Blaming the *airlines* is appropriate, blaming the large passenger is not. But we do things backwards sometimes.

40 posted on 12/03/2009 2:38:44 PM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: paulycy

But it’s not that simple. Because there’s way too many people, with lawyers, that want to yell discrimination. This guy got charged to 1 seat, yet clearly is not capable of sitting in only 1 seat. But if they charged him for 2, or said they didn’t have the extra room, they get problems like Southwest had (linked to in the story).

The airline’s aren’t doing anything wrong, they CAN’T charge the fat guy extra, they’ll get sued or at least get a ton of bad press (again look at what happened to Southwest). And since you made it an either/or question that leaves only the fat guy to blame. If you want to break it out of the either/or we can look at a society that’s so addicted to victim status that airlines fear to say “you’re too fat for one seat, pay for two”.


43 posted on 12/03/2009 2:44:03 PM PST by discostu (The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson