Skip to comments.
Why Does Every Thread (apparently) Start with an ant-Romney Ad? (a vanity post, but sincere)
clique
| clique
Posted on 12/01/2009 8:38:13 AM PST by Clique
Let me be clear: I don't like Romney. I wouldn't vote for Romney. I hope he never runs for President, and if he tries, I hope he never gets the nomination. In other words -- I don't like Romney!
However, -- I am tired of having to scroll past an anti-Romney ad as the #1 entry on every article lately.
Why does every post start with an anti-Romney ad? As far as I know, he isn't even running for anything right now.
In fact, why should every article begin with an anti-Anyone ad?
I've always considered most Freepers to be very objective and fair-minded.
Has FreeRepublic turned into a one-trick pony? (DestroyRomneyDestroyRomneyDestroyRomney...etc.)
It has become quite tiresome. Could someone please tell me why FreeRepublic is doing this?
Jim Robinson, are you aware that this is happening?
Thank you.
TOPICS: Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: acorn4romney; admiralromney; aig4romney; benedictromney; bobj; bothsidesromney; brutusromney; carpetbaggerromey; clueless; cluelessinromneyland; commanderromney; dirtytrickromney; dnc4romney; dummiesrule; fakebadgeromney; fakepollromney; faq; fascistromney; flipflopromney; gaymarriage; generalromney; honestyvsromney; illegals4romney; liars4romney; mexicans4romney; mittromney; mittwhitman; mittwhits; mittwit; mittwits; mlk4romney; msm4romney; nra4romney; obama4romney; objectivity; operationleper; pedophiles4romney; pushpollromney; rinos4mitt; rinos4romney; rinosheartmitt; romney; romney2lose; romney4jones; romney4obama; romney4truthers; romneyafraid; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; romneyantithompson; romneycare; romneycries; romneydeathpanel; romneydivides; romneyhiding; romneyisapussy; romneylies; romneymarriage; romneypromises; romneystinks; romneytaxasfee; romneythrewelection; romneytwosides; romneyundecided; romneyweeps; rudemittbots; ruderomney; ruderomneybots; ruderuderude; socializedmedicine; truthvsromney; veritasvsromney; whitmansbillions; whitmansmitt; whitmansmoney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 361-376 next last
To: IronKros
Equal time. :P
201
posted on
12/01/2009 10:34:21 AM PST
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: Exit148
I was getting so sick of the stock "message" I just had to create my own...
![](http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z229/andy58-in-nh/FR/stupidromney.jpg)
Romney Signs Mass Health Bill to the Universal Acclaim of His New Friends.
202
posted on
12/01/2009 10:35:39 AM PST
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: BykrBayb
So, are you a Huckster supporter or not?
Romney is a RINO (as with The Huckster). The Huckster is also clearly a JUANnabie (Romney likely also). If you are against Romney, why is it so difficult to go against The Huckster? Mormon hate is all that I can conclude.
To: Jim Robinson
And it seems to have brought the Romneybots out of the woodwork. I had no idea there were so many.
204
posted on
12/01/2009 10:36:28 AM PST
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: Paladin2
In my personal opinion. Yes. He is a RINO.
Am I glad the thing with the cop killer ruined his political career? Yes. Although I am saddened for the family of teh people who lost their lives.
Do I give a damn about anything he claims to be for or against or support? No. Hes already proven to me to be something other than a “right wing radical” ;-)
205
posted on
12/01/2009 10:37:11 AM PST
by
myself6
To: psjones
Yes, it is overkill and that’s the problem. It’s like seeing Obama on tv all the time even in those stupid NFL commercials where he looks like the world’s biggest dork.
In time it has the reverse effect that one either doesn’t notice it at all or gets irritated with constantly having the scroll past it.
206
posted on
12/01/2009 10:37:16 AM PST
by
altura
To: staytrue
You are either with us or against us, what can't you understand about that?I had to read your other response to understand your intent. When people I like are doing silly things I find it my obligation to complain. You seem to feel similarly.
207
posted on
12/01/2009 10:38:24 AM PST
by
jimfree
(2012 will not be The Year of the RINO - Act like it!)
To: WatchOutForSnakes
Is everybody supposed to be in complete lock step on this site? Yes and you are supposed to tithe 10% of your income to the Church of Saint Sarah.
To: Paladin2
Romney is a Mormon. Is that anything like a Merman??
209
posted on
12/01/2009 10:39:12 AM PST
by
KosmicKitty
(WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
To: novemberslady
That guy had better watch out for snakes.
210
posted on
12/01/2009 10:40:08 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! God save this great Republic!!)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
I think you might get a bit more traction out of arguing with Sarah Palin supporters I think Sarah should get the next Nobel Peace prize (for accomplishments to be named later). See, I like Sara too !!!
To: Paladin2
Why beat around the bush? If you want to know if my opposition to Romney is something other than what I’ve stated, why not ask that? Or at least ask something that will give you a clue, like what I think of other Mormons (like Glenn Beck).
As it is, you just appear to be defending Romney by attacking me for calling him a liberal scumbag.
212
posted on
12/01/2009 10:41:11 AM PST
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: altura
“He is NO THREAT and will never be a serious candidate.”
I just did a news search and he sure pops up a lot (in a political context) for someone not running. Plus the polls seem to ask about him a lot.
213
posted on
12/01/2009 10:41:36 AM PST
by
DBrow
To: staytrue
I think Sarah should get the next Nobel Peace prize (for accomplishments to be named later). See, I like Sara too !!! My, what an intelligent response. No wonder you have difficulty arguing with Palin supporters. You are unable to converse at an adult level.
214
posted on
12/01/2009 10:43:12 AM PST
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
To: staytrue
Not really. I go to other sites when I want to read your liberal rants. I just don’t want to see it here.
215
posted on
12/01/2009 10:44:08 AM PST
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: staytrue
"Church of Saint Sarah. "
Sarah is neither a RINO nor a JUANnabie. The MSM has apparently convinced liberals and independents and RINOs that she should not be POTUS because of ??? - whatever.
2012 is a long way away and the actual candidates for the two major parties won't be clear for a few years yet.
To: staytrue
I think it is actually helping Romney. Most people like to think for themselves. Trying to jam an anti Romney message down people's throats just gets people mad. The Palinistas are just as bad and they are hurting her cause.I am a Palinista and I don't jam messages down people's throats. I would guess actually that this campaign is having no impact at all. RomneyCare will be looking worse by 2012. He will not be a successful candidate.
Personally, I am almost dead set against Palin, not because of her, but because of the strident yelling of her supporters.
I don't yell and I invite you to support the candidate of your choice.
This anti Romney crusade has pretty much persuaded me to contribute to Fiorina just because I'm mad.
That's it - I could unpledge FreeRepublic and send the money to Carly.
217
posted on
12/01/2009 10:44:41 AM PST
by
jimfree
(In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
To: Paladin2
Dingy Harry is a Mormon. As outlined above, I think a Mormon is unlikely to be elected POTUS in the near future due to (unfounded) fear of Mormonism from both the anti-religious Left and Fundamentalist Christians.
And what does this have to do with the thread question of anti-Romney info?
218
posted on
12/01/2009 10:44:41 AM PST
by
GLDNGUN
To: Peter Horry
So what is going to happen if she is elected president, or even runs for that matter.... will she weather the storm then? That's why we're buying her book and contributing to SarahPAC.
She no longer lacks for funds.
By 2012, she will have more in her little cache than the RNC.
Which will make her the de facto RNC.
219
posted on
12/01/2009 10:44:48 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: WatchOutForSnakes
If it were he would pay for everything himself and not ask for donations.I think you ought to reacquaint yourself with the definition of "donations."
Did you think you were buying an ownership stake?
220
posted on
12/01/2009 10:45:28 AM PST
by
Petronski
(Global warming is indeed man-made: it was created by man-made manipulation of the data.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 361-376 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson