Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Does Every Thread (apparently) Start with an ant-Romney Ad? (a vanity post, but sincere)
clique | clique

Posted on 12/01/2009 8:38:13 AM PST by Clique

Let me be clear: I don't like Romney. I wouldn't vote for Romney. I hope he never runs for President, and if he tries, I hope he never gets the nomination. In other words -- I don't like Romney!

However, -- I am tired of having to scroll past an anti-Romney ad as the #1 entry on every article lately.

Why does every post start with an anti-Romney ad? As far as I know, he isn't even running for anything right now.

In fact, why should every article begin with an anti-Anyone ad?

I've always considered most Freepers to be very objective and fair-minded.

Has FreeRepublic turned into a one-trick pony? (DestroyRomneyDestroyRomneyDestroyRomney...etc.)

It has become quite tiresome. Could someone please tell me why FreeRepublic is doing this?

Jim Robinson, are you aware that this is happening?

Thank you.


TOPICS: Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: acorn4romney; admiralromney; aig4romney; benedictromney; bobj; bothsidesromney; brutusromney; carpetbaggerromey; clueless; cluelessinromneyland; commanderromney; dirtytrickromney; dnc4romney; dummiesrule; fakebadgeromney; fakepollromney; faq; fascistromney; flipflopromney; gaymarriage; generalromney; honestyvsromney; illegals4romney; liars4romney; mexicans4romney; mittromney; mittwhitman; mittwhits; mittwit; mittwits; mlk4romney; msm4romney; nra4romney; obama4romney; objectivity; operationleper; pedophiles4romney; pushpollromney; rinos4mitt; rinos4romney; rinosheartmitt; romney; romney2lose; romney4jones; romney4obama; romney4truthers; romneyafraid; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; romneyantithompson; romneycare; romneycries; romneydeathpanel; romneydivides; romneyhiding; romneyisapussy; romneylies; romneymarriage; romneypromises; romneystinks; romneytaxasfee; romneythrewelection; romneytwosides; romneyundecided; romneyweeps; rudemittbots; ruderomney; ruderomneybots; ruderuderude; socializedmedicine; truthvsromney; veritasvsromney; whitmansbillions; whitmansmitt; whitmansmoney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 361-376 next last
To: Clique

Some people just can’t understand that complaining about a silly ad campaign against a candidate we will not support is not expressing support for said candidate.


101 posted on 12/01/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by jimfree (Why do some Freepers see a RINO under every thoughtful post?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
What can we look forward to next week, the Two Minutes Hate?

Can we enlist Levi Johnson in the Junior Anti-Sex League instead?

102 posted on 12/01/2009 9:19:30 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Clique

Ummm, here’s a thought. Maybe FreeRepublic isn’t a democracy and Jim Robinson can put what ever he wants on here. Take it or leave it.


103 posted on 12/01/2009 9:19:54 AM PST by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clique

Correction: It should read, “I couldn’t agree more with reminding people Romney is all for socialist ideals.


104 posted on 12/01/2009 9:20:38 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

ROFL!! Sounds like a plan!


105 posted on 12/01/2009 9:20:51 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Your first post since April 5,2009 and it’s a complaint about how Jim runs his website. You’re no freeper.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Forgive me for not realizing that McGruff is the only person with the authority to define who is, or is not, a freeper.

Goodbye.


106 posted on 12/01/2009 9:21:37 AM PST by Clique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
"but the incessant anti-Romney stuff is getting old, and a bit petty"

I agree, it reminds me of the below graphic and serves no purpose. We would do better to SUPPORT candidates that promote freedom, prosperity, and security (foreign and domestic) instead venting vitriol against one person.


107 posted on 12/01/2009 9:23:20 AM PST by Peter Horry (Those who aren't responsible always know best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Clique

Because the founder and proprietor really, really doesn’t care for the governor as a prospective presidential candidate, that’s why.


108 posted on 12/01/2009 9:23:53 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heiss
I consider Mormons to be fellow Christians... and I despise romney... his religion does not enter into it in any way.

LLS

109 posted on 12/01/2009 9:25:36 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Socialism is when the government makes decisions for the people that they have no business making.

...and how exactly does your re-definition of already defined terms make the Massachusetts healthcare mandate "socialized" health care?

There already IS a definition for "socialized medicine/healthcare"....and it involves public funding. That is not happening in MA.

I still have the exact same private health care from the exact same private insurer, paid for by my employer and myself...not the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

110 posted on 12/01/2009 9:27:04 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (Didja know that Man walked with 100+ species of large meat eating dinos within the last 4,351 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

There is an obvious undercurrent suggesting that the High Poobahs want Romney for the next candidate. We want them to know that they need to be looking for a real Republican to run.


+1

Bluntly, I think Romney is our version of John Edwards.


111 posted on 12/01/2009 9:27:29 AM PST by Brookhaven (http://theconservativehand.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clique

If this much angst had been directed towards the McCain campaign, we might have averted the disaster of 2008. Say what you want about Romney, but I will take him over McCain any day of the week.


112 posted on 12/01/2009 9:28:25 AM PST by Hoodat (For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry
Show me in the US Constitution where the state can force people to buy something and we can talk.
113 posted on 12/01/2009 9:28:35 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

I agree with you about the anti-Romney ads. It is a real turnoff. Everyone is entitled to their opinions and it is no secret that many Freepers don’t want Romney anywhere near the WH, but we should focus on the real enemy of conservatives—democrats.


114 posted on 12/01/2009 9:29:06 AM PST by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim; Clique

K: Wha’s for afters?
M: Rat cake, rat sorbet, rat pudding, or strawberry tart.
K: (eyes lighting up) Strawberry tart?
M: Well, it’s got some rat in it.
K: ‘Ow much?
M: Three. A lot, really.
K: Well, I’ll have a slice without so much rat in it.

Just as there was rat in each dessert choice in this Monty Python skit. There is Mitt is each FreeRepublic thread these days. Just as useless, just as distasteful.


115 posted on 12/01/2009 9:29:27 AM PST by jimfree (2010 and 2012 are not Years of the RINO - Act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Clique
I've always considered most Freepers to be very objective and fair-minded.

You are kidding right ?

116 posted on 12/01/2009 9:30:08 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

OK, I admit it, you made me laugh out loud.


117 posted on 12/01/2009 9:30:28 AM PST by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Clique

When this started, I wondered why. I didn’t think it was necessary. I thought everybody here already knew what a liberal scumbag Romney is. I didn’t think he had enough supporters here to bother with an educational campaign against him. The longer it goes on, the more obvious it becomes I was wrong. I don’t come here for liberal open-mindedness. I’m glad Jim is sweeping the trash out the door.


118 posted on 12/01/2009 9:30:46 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat
If this much angst had been directed towards the McCain campaign, we might have averted the disaster of 2008. Say what you want about Romney, but I will take him over McCain any day of the week.

Romney is my first choice - for a Palin cabinet Treasury Secretary.

119 posted on 12/01/2009 9:31:51 AM PST by jimfree (2012 will not be The Year of the RINO - Act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Clique

120 posted on 12/01/2009 9:32:09 AM PST by McGruff (We're Going Rogue Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson