Debunking the claims of text on the Shroud of Turin...!
To: Alamo-Girl; albee; AnalogReigns; AnAmericanMother; Angelas; AniGrrl; annalex; annyokie; ...
Claims of Jesus' Death Certificate text on the Shroud of Turin debunked... PING!
  If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.
|
|
|
2 posted on
11/21/2009 9:05:48 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
To: Swordmaker
4 posted on
11/21/2009 10:15:33 PM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: Swordmaker
Glad you weighed in on this!
I respect and trust your expertise on all aspects of Shroud investigations...
5 posted on
11/21/2009 10:50:52 PM PST by
maine-iac7
("He has the right to criticize who has the heart to help" Lincoln)
To: Swordmaker
Whether or not the shroud was Christ’s makes no difference at all. Some Christians have made this thing an idol. It makes no difference to the Biblical record.
To: Swordmaker
This text/not-text thing is a weird distraction. This is Christ's burial shroud, and that's His blood on it.
The marks, bloodtype, pulmonary fluid stains and Gundelia tournefortii pollen on the Sudarium of Oviedo (the facecloth) match those on the Shroud, and the Sudarium has a well-attested provenance going back to the 3rd, or even 1st Century.
The Sudarium therefore extends the provenance of the Shroud way back before the 13th century, which is the date of the burnmark Carbon-dating data.
To: Swordmaker
Thank you again for the research and keeping us posted on the facts.
9 posted on
11/22/2009 5:23:06 AM PST by
NYer
("One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone" - Benedict XVI)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
