Skip to comments.
The Criminal charges of “Conspiracy and Fraud” are served against Nancy Pelosi
American Grand Jury ^
| November 18, 2009
Posted on 11/18/2009 7:40:28 PM PST by Man50D
Rest of the title: in US District Court, Nashville, Tennessee
The Criminal charges of Conspiracy and Fraud are served against Nancy Pelosi in US District Court, Nashville, Tennessee
RELEASED BY: American Grand Jury
Charges filed with multiple State Election Commissions claiming Election fraud by Pelosi and Obama.
American Grand Jury has incorporated the Nancy Pelosi/Barack Obama criminal complaints within its Presentments. The Presentments were served on the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville, TN on November 6th, 2009. A Response in the form of an Order has been issued by Judge Todd Campbell and received by American Grand Jury this week. American Grand Jury will answer the response in the form of a Motion. The American Grand Jury Motion and a copy of the Courts Order will be published on the AGJ website within the next few days.
If acted upon, the Grand Jury Presentments would require that Pelosi and Obama be criminally indicted for Fraud, Conspiracy and Treason.
American Grand Jury is actively pursuing the serving of Presentments in a number of United States District Courts in different States.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: americangrandjury; amgrandjury; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; conspiracy; fraud; obama; orly; pelosi; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-164 next last
To: presently no screen name
You have accused me of speaking FOR others.
I have done no such thing.
I have spoken ABOUT a group or persons actions and how they affect another group or web site .
Let me try to illustrate the difference between speaking FOR others and speaking ABOUT others:
If I said “Oh please.
We think this is the kind of stuff that makes us look like a bunch of weirdos.”
I would be speaking FOR someone - “we”.
But what I said was “Oh please.
This is the kind of stuff that makes us look like a bunch of weirdos.”
I was speaking ABOUT someone. Or more precisely, some SUBJECT and the EFFECT it has on a group.
To explain it further, the above two sentences are actually referring to a subject - “stuff”, and the effect that it has on a group -”us”.
Do you now understand the difference?
You have accused me of back tracking. That is most certainly not the case. I stand by what I said regardless of whether or not you understood it.
81
posted on
11/18/2009 10:46:50 PM PST
by
Nik Naym
(Everyone has a right to my opinion)
To: Nik Naym
Do you now understand the difference?
Do you understand how ridiculous you sound. You were speaking of 'us' and 'we' at FreeRepublic. Freepers aren't intimidated w/fear as you are.
And STOP your talking down to me w/your sarcasm! YOU GOT THAT, bucko?
To: presently no screen name
I am not being sarcastic at all.
YOU made the accusation, you back it up.
You don’t intimidate me, by the way.
There is no point engaging you any further as you don’t seem capable of “getting” it.
83
posted on
11/18/2009 10:58:14 PM PST
by
Nik Naym
(I'm BUCKO, and I don't GET IT!)
To: presently no screen name
[[Now that would bring new meaning to Thanksgiving Day.]]
THAT’S the present I want for Christmas- not soem lame healthcare package for illegals! (Nancy said she would give the citizens healthcare as a Christmas present- I wodnered if I could return it for a refund)
84
posted on
11/18/2009 11:20:47 PM PST
by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: fr_freak
They are merely presenting charges which the "legitimate" court system would have to address, The courts will laugh at, ignore, and trash these charges. Than what?
85
posted on
11/18/2009 11:31:39 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(a wild-eyed, exclusionist, birther religio-beast -- Daily Kos)
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
The courts will laugh at, ignore, and trash these charges. Than what?
I'm not sure. It's up to us I guess. What happens when the courts laugh at, ignore, and trash the US Constitution? This is not a hypothetical question, by the way.
86
posted on
11/18/2009 11:35:45 PM PST
by
fr_freak
To: Man50D
Just one question: is she being charged as a Democratic Party official involved in the national election, or is she being charged as Speaker of the House Pelosi?
87
posted on
11/18/2009 11:45:23 PM PST
by
SatinDoll
(NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
To: fr_freak
Either you elect someone who honors the Constitution or you bring a revolution, whichever seems more practical.
88
posted on
11/18/2009 11:46:24 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(a wild-eyed, exclusionist, birther religio-beast -- Daily Kos)
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Either you elect someone who honors the Constitution or you bring a revolution, whichever seems more practical.
Well, since most judges aren't elected, I suppose we have our answer.
89
posted on
11/18/2009 11:55:12 PM PST
by
fr_freak
To: fr_freak
If they have read the Constitution, the government get's it's authority from the consent of the governed.
" THE PEOPLE " have the final authority, the people's authority supersedes that of the government as far as the US Constitution is concerned, that is something that is forgotten in this day and age.
90
posted on
11/19/2009 1:46:16 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: Nik Naym
This is the kind of stuff that makes us look like a bunch of weirdos.Now, now. These "American Pretend Grand Jury" threads are almost as entertaining as birther threads.
91
posted on
11/19/2009 1:47:57 AM PST
by
Drew68
To: Nik Naym
" Ours is as much a battle for the hearts and minds of the people of this country as it is a battle against socialism marxism and communism so yes, we do need to be concerned with what others think. "
You tend to forget, that there are many who have a preconceived and prejudice thought pattern when they view us, and no matter what we say will change their minds.
92
posted on
11/19/2009 1:50:51 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: Man50D

Charge Nancy 'Nazi' Pelosi for commission of the felonies of Conspiracy and Fraud!!!
93
posted on
11/19/2009 1:51:38 AM PST
by
myknowledge
(F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
To: Melas
And so ? you believe that the main fringe media is impartial also ? was OJ Simpson's jury impartial ? what about Eric Holder's impartiality towards the case involving those Black Panthers who were charged with voter intimidation and the charges were dropped, don't tell us about impartiality.
94
posted on
11/19/2009 1:54:10 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: presently no screen name
" Sounds like American Patriots who believe the Constitution is the law of the land. You got a problem w/that? "
Those who have a problem with it are those who call the " Birthers " and those who want the US Constitution upheld " Crazy " and " KOOKS " ...
95
posted on
11/19/2009 1:58:57 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: annieokie
Seems just like what Crissy Mathews , Kieth Olberman , Ed Schultz, David Axselrod are saying about the “ Bithers “ they mock us.
96
posted on
11/19/2009 2:04:03 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: Man50D
Here is a copy of the 5 th amendment.
Amendment V:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
97
posted on
11/19/2009 2:11:06 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
The states are still independent sovereign states joined in together in a UNION with a central Republic Federal government.
The US Constitution is a covenant with the people and the government who have “ Granted “ them the authority that they have derived from “ THE PEOPLE “.
The US Constitution was originally intended as a convenient between “ THE PEOPLE “ and the government who grants consent to the government to govern over them, and to make stronger the UNION of the free and independent states.
98
posted on
11/19/2009 2:23:14 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: Nik Naym
"Oh please. This is the kind of stuff that makes us look like a bunch of weirdos."The "weirdos" are the ones who cower in fear of the MSM labeling them as "weirdos". Get a backbone.
99
posted on
11/19/2009 2:28:08 AM PST
by
Godebert
To: Man50D
What a waste of FReeper Bandwidth.....tsk tsk
100
posted on
11/19/2009 2:31:57 AM PST
by
Halgr
(Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-164 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson