The Criminal charges of “Conspiracy and Fraud” are served against Nancy Pelosi

American Grand Jury ^ | November 18, 2009

[Man50D]

Rest of the title: in US District Court, Nashville, Tennessee

The Criminal charges of “Conspiracy and Fraud” are served against Nancy Pelosi in US District Court, Nashville, Tennessee

RELEASED BY: American Grand Jury

Charges filed with multiple State Election Commissions claiming Election fraud by Pelosi and Obama.

American Grand Jury has incorporated the Nancy Pelosi/Barack Obama criminal complaints within its Presentments. The Presentments were served on the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville, TN on November 6th, 2009. A Response in the form of an “Order” has been issued by Judge Todd Campbell and received by American Grand Jury this week. American Grand Jury will answer the response in the form of a Motion. The American Grand Jury Motion and a copy of the Court’s Order will be published on the AGJ website within the next few days.

If acted upon, the Grand Jury Presentments would require that Pelosi and Obama be criminally indicted for “Fraud, Conspiracy and Treason.”

American Grand Jury is actively pursuing the serving of Presentments in a number of United States District Courts in different States.

[American Constitutionalist]

Remember, the founding fathers of this country staked their honor and reputations when they signed the Declaration of Independence.

[Godebert]

"Oh please. This is the kind of stuff that makes us look like a bunch of weirdos."

I noticed you have the following written on your home page:

I swore an oath to the Constitution of the United States. That oath contains a phrase stating that I swear to defend it against "...all enemies, foreign and domestic." I meant it.

You meant it? You are a coward. You should strike that from your homepage immediately.

[Right Wing Assault]

No problem. I’ve just started a one-man group called the
American Supreme Court and the nine of us just decided When I woke up this morning that obama must show all of his missing records by noon today.

If he doesn’t, we are going to declare him ex-president at 12:01. We don’t need no stinkin’ Grand Jury.

[roamer_1]

[fr_freak:] The government also does not have a monopoly on the legitimate use of force.

[Lucius Cornelius Sulla:] Actually that monopoly is the definition of what a government is. In the revolution the states were sovereign and would have hanged anybody in a 'citizen grand jury'.

Actually, you are quite incorrect. The right of the People to use "legitimate force" is among the very first principles of our Union; following only the enumerated rights:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Declaration of Independence of the United States of America (1776)

When any form of government does not protect the unalienable rights of the People (which is the actual definition of what THIS government is supposed to do - protect our rights), it is the People's right and duty to use force to overthrow them.

The Constitution honors documents written before it, so therein, honors these words above all.

[Man50D]

It is not childish.

Referring to people who are citing Constitutional law to remove a an illegal occupier of the office of President as "wierdos" doesn't exactly rise to the level of well reasoned thought. A child can make such a statement in a heartbeat. Instead you employ the same tactic as the socialists by attempting to discredit a process you oppose. At the very least you could raise your argument above the levels of those two with well reasoned discourse as adults can do instead of merely resorting to insults.

[Man50D]

Oh I understand the grand jury process well enough to understand that this is going nowhere. Do you want to bet differently?

I don't know where it will lead. I do know if people don't invoke the powers granted to them in the Bill Of Rights then it will definitely go nowhere but by exercising those rights there is at the very least a possibility it will have an effect. I also know the worst outcome is we end up in the same place as we are now.

It's amazing you and others are using the same tactic the socialists use to discredit their opposition with insulting remarks such as "This kind of whackjobbery just makes the rest of at FR look like total nutcases" to voice your opposition instead of respectively presenting well reasoned thought to buttress your otherwise insipid claims.

When did Jim Robinson make you the spokesperson for FR?

[Man50D]

Just one question: is she being charged as a Democratic Party official involved in the national election, or is she being charged as Speaker of the House Pelosi?

She's being charged with the act of fraudulently certifying BO. The fact she signed off implies she is in a position of authority to certify a candidate regardless in which capacity she was employing at the time she signed the document.

[Man50D]

What a waste of FReeper Bandwidth.....tsk tsk,

It's sad when you think invoking rights in the Bill of rights granted to the people by our founding fathers is a waste and only illustrates how little people understand them or the Constitution.

[Marty62]

Yes we should be like the DUMMIES and NEVER think outside the commie/fascist/socialist BOX.
I bet there were some COLONISTS that thought the small group of “RADICALS” that sent King George the demand for Freedom were considered nutcases.
But hey, this is what makes Americans ..Americans.
This move is a reaffirmation of our LEGAL system.
Now we will see what Pelosi and Zero do as a counter move.
Demand that some spineless Judge dismiss it or else.

[Quickgun]

Caring too much about what we looked like may have been partially responsible for the sorry state of affairs our Gubmint is in? Zero and Pelosi ARE traitors, whether we just state it here on FR, whisper it to our neighbor,or go file charges against them!Just my opinion ☺

[verity]

” ...I also ask again what special legal knowledge...”

My derision has nothing to do with ‘special legal knowledge.’ Rather, it is founded on the probability that a bastardized legal system and politics will render this action moot.

[Dustbunny]

Wow !!!!

[SaraJohnson]

Name calling is all you got in your intellectually and morally superior arsenal? I am surprised. Not.

[SaraJohnson]

“This is not about my ego or image. This is about fighting for our constitution and our American way of life. This is a fight for our very survival.

Distractions such as this made-up jury are more help to the enemy than they are help to our side.”

---

I must have missed it. What are you doing that is superior to these embarassing people to force the political elite to uphold and yeild to the rule of law - the constitution? Let us know your superior game plan so we won’t be distracted from the real game in town.

[SaraJohnson]

“My father has 56 years of legal experience and he thinks your father is a poopiehead.”

---

You represent the intellegence and thoughtfulness of your side of the issue well. Thanks for clearing that up.

[SaraJohnson]

The claim made was based on experienced legal advise from the man's dad. You belittled that legal advice as if it means nothing while you admit you know nothing. And then you call people “weirdos” who have legally researched the grand jury effort for having done so.

If you can't argue the issue and can only name call those who have legally investigated the issue, you should get off the thread because you are not adding anything of benefit here.

[Petronski]

Satire is messy. Deal with it.

[Melas]

Name calling is all you got in your intellectually and morally superior arsenal?

The irony here is delicious.

[IntolerantOfTreason]

Concern troll sounds concerned ...

You think people who support the constitution and the rule of law are weirdos?

[IntolerantOfTreason]

Well, if you feel that way about FR, maybe you should leave? FR is for conservatives, not limp-wristed RINOs who aren’t willing to pay lip service to THE CONSTITUTION.