Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood rethinks use of A-list actors
Reuters ^ | November 13, 2009 | Alex Dobuzinskis

Posted on 11/17/2009 8:05:59 AM PST by EveningStar

Hollywood studios are now thinking twice about splurging on A-list movie stars and costly productions in reaction to the poor economy, but also because of the surprising success of recent films with unknown actors.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: actors; budget; hollywood; movies; moviestars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last
To: altura
Bruce Willis never made a bad movie (that I can think of).

Even Bruce has an off day once in a while:

Hudson Hawk

The Last Boy Scout

Striking Distance

Color of the Night

Live Free or Die Hard (aka Die Hard 4.)

61 posted on 11/17/2009 9:15:43 AM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

It did in the past, but now that we know their political leanings and see them at political gatherings too often and on talk shows spouting nonsense we don’t wish to spend money watching them on the “silver screen” anymore. Maybe they will gert a clue, maybe not.


62 posted on 11/17/2009 9:15:56 AM PST by Citizen Soldier ("You care far too much what is written and said about you." Axelrod to Obama 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

2012’s ONLY saving grace is the extended Death of Los Angeles scene. I suspect people will watch it over and over again, like the Chariot Race in “Ben-Hur”.


63 posted on 11/17/2009 9:16:00 AM PST by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Borges
But a ticket cost about a dime back then.

Yes, but you were only making 60 cents an hour back then.

64 posted on 11/17/2009 9:19:37 AM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
LOL! You must have seen a far different version than I did. Plot holes the size of Australia.... Assuming, that is, that you could stretch the word enough to say that the movie had a "plot" at all.

I'm no Trekkie, would not have been interested in the movie otherwise, but man, that had to be a big disappointment to those long-time fans, a more loyal bunch I've yet to see, but for maybe the old bobby-soxer of Sinatra's days. Considering how much potential that thing had, that's a shame.

Speaking of Australia, is Nicole Kidman on the A-list? Because I rented that movie thinking it had to be good, with her, Hugh Jackman, I thought surely we were in for some kind of historical novel-film, perhaps a bit of the story on how Australia came into being. Boy, was I wrong. This movie was one of the worst things I've ever put out a dollar for, in fact, I requested a refund/substitute for renting it. Phewwww, it stunk!!

65 posted on 11/17/2009 9:21:32 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

It was better than any of the earlier ST films. More cinematic with better character development.


66 posted on 11/17/2009 9:21:32 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Borges
It was better than any of the earlier ST films. More cinematic with better character development.

You're kidding, right? All they did was mash together all of the behavioral cliches from TOS and shove them into a craptastic mess of a story that doesn't hold an ounce of water.

67 posted on 11/17/2009 9:24:32 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg
The late great Phil Hartman was also in it.

He played the role of Bruce's older brother, and he set Bruce up for the date with Kim Bassinger.

Great movie!

68 posted on 11/17/2009 9:25:57 AM PST by GI Joe Fan (GI Joe represents Real American Heroes, not a bunch of globalist drones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg
Boy, was I wrong. This movie was one of the worst things I've ever put out a dollar for, in fact, I requested a refund/substitute for renting it. Phewwww, it stunk!!

My wife and middle son watched and hated it.... Middle son trenchantly observed that there were two problems with it. First, they clearly couldn't decide on how to end it, so they shoved all of the endings into it instead. And, second, they were clearly trying to make a political point, and couldn't figure out the right way to do that, either ... which is probably why they had to keep adding endings.

69 posted on 11/17/2009 9:27:24 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: altura

If Bruce Willis is in a movie, he himself is fun and entertaining unless the movie is such a stinker that he can’t overcome the anchor around his neck.

And yes, he has been in some real stinkers.


70 posted on 11/17/2009 9:33:16 AM PST by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
entertainment per dollar is the pits

The other night, Mrs WBill and I picked up a movie from RedBox, popped some corn, and had a "Date".

$1 for the movie. A few cents for the popcorn (extra real butter and just a smidge of salt, which I like). Total cost: A Buck and Change.

We went to the theater once earlier this year. $9 each for tickets. $3 or so for Cokes. $5 for popcorn (artificial butter flavoring, and extra salt, neither of which I'm particularly fond of but I always get when I go to the movies because I remember it better than it actually is.... :-) ). Total cost: 30 bucks.

The movie was ok ("Star Trek"), but really, we were more paying for a kid-free night out.

I wonder how many people go to movies because they think it's somehow "better", how many go just to get out of the house (like wife and I), and how many go just because they don't know any better?

71 posted on 11/17/2009 9:44:50 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Thanks for reminding me of his name. He’s definitely an excellent actor.


72 posted on 11/17/2009 9:45:13 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

It was about the qualities needed to be a leader. It was witty, exciting and moving. Orson Scott Card called it one of the best adventure films of all time.


73 posted on 11/17/2009 9:45:21 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Borges
HEY! I liked "Hudson Hawk".

Lousy movie, but everyone in it looked like they were having so much fun. Like, "Wow, this script really stinks. Let's just enjoy ourselves."

I still sing "Swingin' on a Star" when I want to time a computer process that I'm running. :-)

74 posted on 11/17/2009 9:47:09 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wbill

My husband and I are like you. We never go to the theater. No movie is so great that it can’t wait until a DVD release.

We enjoy going to drive-ins in the summer. We have one about 30 minutes from us...it’s a great night out, get 2 new releases for $6/person, can bring your own food and get to enjoy the nice night time weather.


75 posted on 11/17/2009 9:48:59 AM PST by JenB987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
IF you like Westerns, take a couple of hours to watch Tombstone. It's more recent (90s), and one of the better Westerns I've seen. Val Kilmer, as Doc Holliday, just chews up the screen.

And I like Sam Elliot in just about anything he does.

76 posted on 11/17/2009 9:49:47 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wbill
"HEY! I liked "Hudson Hawk"."

Well, then I guess that makes two of us. I think it's one of the funniest nonsense-type slapstick movies in my video library. They certainly look like they're having fun making the movie, especially James Coburn reprising his "Our Man Flint" role beyond all recognition...

77 posted on 11/17/2009 9:51:31 AM PST by BlueLancer (I'm getting a fine tootsy-frootsying right here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JenB987
YEAH! I wish we had a Drive-in closer to us, the nearest one is a couple of hours away.

Sound and picture are lousy, but you get a double feature for 10 bucks or so a car. And, you can take a picnic. Good way to spend a summer evening. :-)

78 posted on 11/17/2009 9:53:44 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
It's not a classic. Not "Academy-Worthy" (which is generally a plus in my book, most films that get Oscars suck, IMHO).

It's just 2 hours of entertainment. Doesn't bog you down with a lot of details, either.

And, it has David Caruso in it. Anything with "Carusitas" *, has got to be extra cheesy.

*Carusitas = David Caruso trying to have much more gravitas than he actually has. Like on CSI.....he starts a sentence, makes a dramatic pause while taking off his sunglasses for added emphasis....then finishes the sentence.

look it up, there's entire you tube videos that consist of Carusitas. :-)

79 posted on 11/17/2009 9:59:24 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

In the question and answer part of the Sunday magazine people ask questions about “personalities.” I don’t even know who most of these people are. I guess I must be getting old!


80 posted on 11/17/2009 9:59:31 AM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson