Posted on 11/17/2009 8:05:59 AM PST by EveningStar
Hollywood studios are now thinking twice about splurging on A-list movie stars and costly productions in reaction to the poor economy, but also because of the surprising success of recent films with unknown actors.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
They are doing well for the most part. 2012 being the most recent example. Movies are still a very cheap form of entertainment.
B-List stars acting mistaken for what was once A-List acting.
Who'd a thunk it?
I have always said, actors/actresses are no more than jesters. They are entertainers. Their job is to provide something to distract me from my important life at my leisure and whim. I choose how I would like to be distracted and in what fashion as my time permits. It does not take a whole lot of training to be an actor. Most of them are one dimensional and the product of a successful opportunistic endeavor. Right place at the right time.
Some are truly magnificent and talent is apparent in the exceptional cases (Tom Hanks, Dustin Hoffman, many of the “las generation”).
For most successful on scree thespians, their entire existence and self worth is nothing more than the measure of a person from their bubble of peers. They have little grasp on the real world and look down on the “do-good” day to day hard working Americans. Their measure of importance boils down to what cause they can champion to establish some importance or contribution to society. Their perspective (from inside the bubble) leads them to some of the most insane causes. But it is the wackiest of causes that gets the MSM all wee-weed up, gives them a “stage” and encourages mindless bloviating on topics they are grossly ignorant about. It is unfortunate that so many American's feed the market of opinion for these fools.
Disclaimer: As all generalizations impart bias for the few excepted individuals, I recognize there are honest, hard working, respectful and humble individuals of the on screen celebrity persuasion.
It's hard to believe we were introduced to this guy as the cigarette-hiding-in-mouth dude from Class, not to mention his *brilliant follow-up* as one of the dorks in Sixteen Candles.
When I started following what they were doing with CGI in the early 90’s, I started telling my kids that eventually, movies will say, in their ad copy, “Starring the VOICE OF...”.
I just watched the 3d version of A Christmas Carol. “WHO” the star voice was behind the CG was irrelevent. Their “voice” acting ability is all that mattered. I realized, during the credits, that Jim Carey was the voice of not only Scrooge, but several characters. But I did not recognize it even in scrooge.
Actors look to be going the way of every other job. That is, no notoriety, but paid based on quality, not “fame”.
That is a good thing.
“Were birds of a feather..last movie I saw in a theater was
Saving Private Ryan.”
Just about the same here.
I lived in Los Angeles during 1995-2005.
The films I actually saw in a theater:
Independence Day
Heavy Metal (when my hipper younger brother visited)
We Were Soldiers
The Aviator
Downfall (”Untergang”; a GREAT film about Hitler’s last days)
By and large, I just won’t part with my hard-earned $ for the
generic crap that Hollyweird carpetbombs us with on a weekly basis.
“Hasn’t Hollywood traditionally done better during bad times?
I’ve always heard that people went to the movies as a
substitute for more expensive entertainment, and to forget
about poor economy.”
Yes. Shirley Temple (now Temple Black) eared $100,000 a year during FDR’s Great Depression.
We haven’t spent money to go to a movie (other than I-MAX) in a couple of years. I think the last regular movie we saw was 300. In part it’s because it is too darn expensive, but also because, in general, I don’t want to support these communists. I do make exceptions with some of my favourite directors/stars if the movie looks exceptional. Just haven’t seen much that looks exceptional coming out of Hollywood in the last 10 years or so. We did see a great I-MAX movie a few weeks back—Sea Monsters—about the sea animals that lived in Kansas. Even my mom liked it which is saying something.
Bruce Willis never made a bad movie (that I can think of). He’s way underrated as an actor AND he’s a conservative.
The others on the list I won’t watch because they are stupid, silly and make stupid movies.
Julia’s okay but not a draw anymore.
Heck, is there a more expensive night out than taking your family to the movies? Between the ticket prices and the snack costs .. and the general atmosphere of chaotic anarchy inside the theater itself .. I would rather go to the dentist (and it would probably be cheaper to do so).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESISTOR
Swear allegiance to the flag, whatever flag they offer;
Never hint at what you really feel.
Teach the children quietly for, someday, sons and daughters
Will rise up and fight while we stood still.
Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmändø (EMØØK)
I’ve thought for years that the Hollywood star system was a relic from the golden days of the big studios.
In a few years, once CGI evolves to its next generation, the whole notion of live actors will be obsolete. Then, with a few software changes, a director can create exactly the character he wants and make it do exactly what he envisions. No more compromises with temperamental tarts or talentless twirps. The auteur will truly control the entire esthetic.
Look for today’s divas to be performing sexual favors for the price of a tuna sandwich.
Saw Downfall on DVD. You forget you are watching a movie. Incredible performance.
I loved Cusack in Say Anything and that other early teen movie, but now I can’t stand him.
In the past that would be true. Movies were a relatively inexpensive night out. Today, it's different. Movie theaters demand high prices, the price of amenities is ridiculous, and the entertainment per dollar is the pits. Coupled with movie rentals and On Demand movies, why bother?
The recent Batman movies had very strong ensemble casts but none of them were really A listers like Cruise. Probably the cast of the Batman Begins earned combined what Cruise did for appearing in War of the Worlds that came out the same year. Batman Begins made Christian Bale a star. He was bit of a unknown commodity most famous for playing the kid in Spielberg’s Empire of the Sun. Makes much more sense to spend your casting budget on great character actors like Caine, Friedman, Oldham than blow it on the likes of a Cruise or Kidman.
Have you been to a movie lately? My wife and I took my daughter to this Hanna Montanna movie a while back. It was not "cheap" entertainment (or less expensive).
I think the three of us shared a popcorn and soda. It was about $50 all-in for a 90 minute show.
Movies are all special effects these days
Real acting is dead
I have heard Bruce sarcastically refer to a couple of his movies as not exactly “academy worthy.” One was Hudson Hawk and I forget the other.
One of my favorite movies...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.