Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President must decide whether sending humans beyond earth’s orbit is worth the expense.
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | 11/15/09 | CHARLES F. KENNEL

Posted on 11/15/2009 6:56:21 AM PST by KevinDavis

NASA, at age 50, is having a midlife crisis. What should it do after it retires the shuttle? Can it, should it, recreate the glories of its youth? Or should it mature into a wise enabler of technological and institutional leadership?

The 2003 Space Shuttle disaster, underfunding of President George W. Bush’s call to go to the “Moon, Mars and Beyond” and the advent of a new presidential administration have caused NASA to re-evaluate its mission at a truly fundamental level. The President’s Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee, led by retired Lockheed Martin CEO Norman Augustine, was asked to develop feasible scenarios for the next steps in human space flight. I was privileged to participate.

First we asked what NASA can accomplish with its current budget. Our core conclusion is that, while the current budget can lay the groundwork for manned missions beyond earth orbit as Bush had envisioned, the present program or any other that aspires to send humans beyond earth’s orbit cannot be accomplished in the next decade. Additional funding of $3 billion per year would be needed. President Barack Obama has to decide whether it is worth it.

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dithering; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
I wish Obama would make up his mind for once.. We have a boy doing a mans job..
1 posted on 11/15/2009 6:56:21 AM PST by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48; Rio; Iowan; hattend; reader25; july4thfreedomfoundation; NorwegianViking; ...


For other space news go to: http://www.spacetoday.net
For a list of Private Space Companies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_spaceflight_companies


2 posted on 11/15/2009 6:56:53 AM PST by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Playing with the little president playset.


3 posted on 11/15/2009 7:00:00 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

If ever entangled in an annoying debate with an America-hating international, the fail-safe closer is: “We put 12 men on the moon. What have you done?”


4 posted on 11/15/2009 7:05:21 AM PST by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

He will mosf likely decide .... that he is present.


5 posted on 11/15/2009 7:10:39 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

In my younger years no-one supported the space program like I did, then the shuttle program came along. We were told men could be put in space in almost a moments notice...
What we got was a very impressive spacecraft that couldn’t take off or land it there was a cloud in the sky. A moments notice became months or years. Did we learn from the research? Yes, but that’s always NASA’s excuse for overspending and underproducing. If we had just spent the money on technological research, i.e. Star Wars, I think we might have gotten much more return on the investment. On the other hand, space is an area we better not find ourselves in second place. What are other’s thoughts?


6 posted on 11/15/2009 7:16:27 AM PST by millerph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Contrary to popular belief, the climate of the planet Earth has NEVER been stable. The likelihood of another Ice Age in the next 10,000 years is undeniable.
7 posted on 11/15/2009 7:18:54 AM PST by PushinTin (NEVER, argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Giving hundreds of billions to a bunch of corrupt blood suckers is an investment but funding high tech is a money waster? Only 3 more years until this loser is given the boot.


8 posted on 11/15/2009 7:19:16 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

He’ll appoint a czar, have a summit, give a lot of speaches. Outcome: nothing.


9 posted on 11/15/2009 7:36:09 AM PST by LiberConservative ("Sarah Palin irritates all the right people." -Dennis Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

We should concede world leadership in science, technology and space exploration.

Hand the mantle to the Chinese. /s


10 posted on 11/15/2009 7:39:43 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Do we get to nominate the humans??

Michael Moore comes to mind...

Hell, yeah! It’s worth it!


11 posted on 11/15/2009 7:41:46 AM PST by djf (Maybe life ain't about the doing - maybe it's just the trying... Hey, I don't make the rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I think Obama should be the first to try it. I might even send a donation.


12 posted on 11/15/2009 7:46:46 AM PST by dforest (Who is the real Jim Thompson? I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

This isn’t a very important decision. NASA has been a can that’s been kicked down the road for decades now. They do unmanned flights just fine and there’s no real need to do manned flights.


13 posted on 11/15/2009 7:50:25 AM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Why is Barack Obama even brought into this? Are these journalists Leftists, such that they can only see the human destiny of exploration and initiative in terms of a politician, and an irrelevant juvenile at that?

We support a moonbase, even a well developed one, prior to Mars settlement for the very reason we have procrastinated on returning to the Moon for forty years; that is, don't extend so far and so expensively that the Left (primarily female) will argue the bleeding heart priorities-at-home rant. Start relatively close-by where the infrastructure of extraterrestrial basing can be developed with less cost, while also exploiting the Moon's own inherent benefits. The latter of which includes the low energy cost of moon launching into extended realms, although admittedly the question of energy availability on and from the Moon is an essential one.

Incidentally this latter question on energy availability for Moonbase survival will inject the thermodynamic basis of economics into its proper perspective, for which The Suntrade Institute has argued all along. Just one of the side benefits that comes from man's exploration of the extended universe.

Johnny Suntrade

14 posted on 11/15/2009 7:53:14 AM PST by jnsun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Hussein will concede world leadership in science, technology, as well as manned and unmanned space exploration, handing the mantle to the Chinese, Russians, Indians, Japanese, British, and French. No sarc.
15 posted on 11/15/2009 7:53:47 AM PST by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PIF

You wasted valuable pixels and time with the “No sarc” comment. It would have been implied. lol


16 posted on 11/15/2009 7:59:34 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

The current occupant of the White House should have no say in this matter whatsoever.


17 posted on 11/15/2009 8:20:13 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Valuable pixels? Didn’t know! Wow!

Just wanted to make sure all understood...


18 posted on 11/15/2009 8:20:30 AM PST by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dr_who; All

Robots only in space are for wimps... We can do manned flights just fine..


19 posted on 11/15/2009 8:26:51 AM PST by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PIF

I wasn’t being insulting. You did see the “LOL” a the end.

your post was right on and added to the comedy, though I don’t what France is. LOL


20 posted on 11/15/2009 8:27:10 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson