Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mrs. Logic; Ayn Rand never got into an argument she couldn’t win...
NYTMag ^ | Oct 18, 2009 | Sam Anderson

Posted on 11/01/2009 6:12:32 PM PST by Daffynition

Whenever Ayn Rand met someone new—an acolyte who’d traveled cross-country to study at her feet, an editor hoping to publish her next novel—she would open the conversation with a line that seems destined to go down as one of history’s all-time classic icebreakers: “Tell me your premises.” Once you’d managed to mumble something halfhearted about loving your family, say, or the Golden Rule, Rand would set about systematically exposing all of your logical contradictions, then steer you toward her own inviolable set of premises: that man is a heroic being, achievement is the aim of life, existence exists, A is A, and so forth—the whole Objectivist catechism. And once you conceded any part of that basic platform, the game was pretty much over. She’d start piecing together her rationalist Tinkertoys until the mighty Randian edifice towered over you: a rigidly logical Art Deco skyscraper, 30 or 40 feet tall, with little plastic industrialists peeking out the windows—a shining monument to the glories of individualism, the virtues of selfishness, and the deep morality of laissez-faire capitalism. Grant Ayn Rand a premise and you’d leave with a lifestyle.

Stated premises, however, rarely get us all the way down to the bottom of a philosophy. Even when we think we’ve reached bedrock, there’s almost always a secret subbasement blasted out somewhere underneath. William James once argued that every philosophic system sets out to conceal, first of all, the philosopher’s own temperament: that pre-rational bundle of preferences that urges him to hop on whatever logic-train seems to be already heading in his general direction. This creates, as James put it, “a certain insincerity in our philosophic discussions: the potentest of all our premises is never mentioned..."

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at nymag.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Religion
KEYWORDS: atheist; atlasshrugged; ayn; aynrand; leftwing; objectivism; rand; religion; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: CaptRon
And this is a problem because...?

...the article continues beyond your attention span. ;-)

21 posted on 11/02/2009 5:28:24 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Don’t know who you are, but I know you don’t know me so you can’t possibly know my attention span, a-hole. And you obivously missed my point. Or was your attention span too short? Hope we meet some day.


22 posted on 11/02/2009 5:31:31 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

LOL


23 posted on 11/02/2009 6:34:58 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson