Bang galore ping.
bookmarking. Thanks.
Amazing how the fairytales just keep changing.
I suspect that choosing the name for a crater responsible for the destruction of the known world (at the time) was a no-brainer.
This can’t be right According to many Freepers the Earth is only 6000 years old. I read it on the internet so it’s definitely true.
Shiva is an appropriate name.
When these meteors hit they must crush a gazillion dinosaurs at a time to generate that much oil at the impact site.
I was just reading about this a few days ago.
decimon wrote: Bang galore ping.You, sir, are a card.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks decimon. Pinging this one because A) it's bound to be of interest and B) to avoid any duplications (or at least, try to ;'). |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Certainly is reasonable that there could be a second crater from the same comet/collision.
Jupiter was clobbered recently by a series of 8 fragments, and the Decca Traps lava flows are at the same time period. Thru-earth resonances of the one Yucatan peninsula collision don’t seem to be large enough to create enough of a hole to release that much lava volume.
Just as with Shoemaker-Levy breaking up to cause a string of collisions, there is no reason why there couldn’t have been multiple impacts at or near the same time.