To: GL of Sector 2814
Why is it that such people have to announce that they are not having kids? It isn’t exactly that hard to not have children.
2 posted on
10/09/2009 7:21:01 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: GL of Sector 2814
No big deal. Lots of people who shouldn’t have kids have them anyway.
3 posted on
10/09/2009 7:21:16 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: GL of Sector 2814
As much as I dislike the enslaving and devaluing of women that occured after the advent of the birth control pill, I have to say that children and the gene pool are better off without this woman.
4 posted on
10/09/2009 7:22:22 AM PDT by
Elvina
(BHO is doubleplus ungood.)
To: GL of Sector 2814
There will always be couples for whom childlessness is a legitimate option. But in the context of a materialistic, hedonistic culture, this is a symptom of cultural suicide. Western civilization is dying, and in a matter of decades not centuries. What will replace it?
5 posted on
10/09/2009 7:22:37 AM PDT by
Liberty1970
(Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
To: GL of Sector 2814
WGAS? Having children (or not) is a choice and not something to be celebrated or denigrated one way or the other.
6 posted on
10/09/2009 7:23:05 AM PDT by
Grunthor
(Thank YOU George Bush, for giving us the GOP of today!)
To: GL of Sector 2814
"Having children or being childless has a lot to do with a woman's identity. We can be financially independent beings on our own. Our security is not tied to marriage and children," Scott says.Security. Tell that to the sterile Europeans in 20 years.
To: GL of Sector 2814
So long has she isn't using abortion as her method of birth control, then I am not too worried. She has the right to not have children just as much as the Duggars have the right to have 18 19 children. Keep the government out of such choices (and the government should not have to fund either abortion or for children you cannot support yourself.)
13 posted on
10/09/2009 7:32:39 AM PDT by
TheBattman
(Pray for our country...)
To: GL of Sector 2814
A desire to not have children tends to rapidly remove itself from the gene pool.
15 posted on
10/09/2009 7:40:33 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: GL of Sector 2814
Scott says people ask her what she will do when she's old. "Well, I'll create a social network with people to come to my aid," she says. "Is that really a reason to have a child? To breed a caregiver?" And, of course - ALL THOSE BIG GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS that you and your kids WILL BE PAYING FOR IN TAXES.
16 posted on
10/09/2009 7:40:59 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: GL of Sector 2814
Raising kids is not easy, but seeing your son graduate magna cum laude from law school and looking forward to dancing with your daughter at her wedding next spring makes it worth all the stress.
17 posted on
10/09/2009 7:41:20 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
To: GL of Sector 2814
I have no beef with childless couples, I just wish that the significant portion of them who act like martyrs about it would quit whining.
18 posted on
10/09/2009 7:43:06 AM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
To: GL of Sector 2814
I have no beef with couples that choose to be childless, I just wish that the significant portion of them who act like martyrs about it would quit whining.
19 posted on
10/09/2009 7:43:28 AM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
To: GL of Sector 2814
I’m 34 & my wife’s 28. She had a hysterectomy about 3 years ago due to endometriosis-type symptoms and other serious health problems, and it’s probably just as well since some of them are genetic. We’d like to have kids, and still may adopt if we ever get financially sound enough to do so & if her health is good enough to care for a child, but I don’t really see why anyone else (outside the family) would care what we do or why.
23 posted on
10/09/2009 7:57:01 AM PDT by
Sloth
(For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of the International Olympic Committee.)
To: GL of Sector 2814
My guess is that after having become well acquainted with these clowns (yah,the husband too) I would come to conclude that they both did this world a *huge* favor by remaining childless.
To: GL of Sector 2814
Is that really a reason to have a child? To breed a caregiver?Get with the twentieth century - we elect our caregivers nowadays. Instead of expecting our kids to help us out when we become old, we expect strangers we don't know and and have no responsibility toward to fill that role. Of course we'll never meet them, but our elected caregivers/nannies will tax their livelihood on our behalf.
28 posted on
10/09/2009 8:12:09 AM PDT by
eclecticEel
(The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
To: GL of Sector 2814
Fine.
Treat with contempt the struggle of all the generations before you to convey the precious gift of life to the next generation.
The fewer children liberals and leftists have, the fewer there will be to deal with in the future.
Now, if we can just get them to all subscribe to early VHE (voluntary human extinction, another ultraliberal cause), we won’t have to support them in their old age either.
How about a nice cup of Kool-Aid, dear?
33 posted on
10/09/2009 10:29:02 AM PDT by
Captain Rhino
(“Si vis pacem, para bellum” - if you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: GL of Sector 2814
45 posted on
10/09/2009 3:09:11 PM PDT by
dfwgator
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson