It will take a long time to study these things and to determine what they mean.
So the new evidence perfectly matches their pre-determined conclusions. This musta been funded by a govt grant.
Another Chinese hoax, wishful thinking, or the real thing? Time will tell.
Are these the same Chinese that faked the other bird/dino fossils?
|
|||
Gods |
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
INTREP
I guess it doesn’t matter that the pulmonary systems of mammals and birds are incompatible. Mammals breathe in and out, birds breath straight through. Oh well...details!
Just read this on another thread with the opposite conclusions. Would comment but it would just start a fight with the other guys.
parsy, who wonders
So, finding feathered dinosaurs that pre-date the non-feathered dinosaurs is somehow seen as supporting the “theory” that animals evolved from scales to feathers.
Fortunately, being the story of evolution, and not the actual theory of evolution, we can just re-write the history so that feathers came first, and everything’s good.