1 posted on
09/19/2009 12:51:49 PM PDT by
holly101
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: holly101
To: holly101
3 posted on
09/19/2009 12:54:12 PM PDT by
mowowie
To: holly101
4 posted on
09/19/2009 12:54:16 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(Joe Wilson Truth Czar for a Free Republic!)
To: holly101
PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.
5 posted on
09/19/2009 12:54:26 PM PDT by
BigFinn
(Isa 32:8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.)
To: holly101
who is going to contribute money to a forum where anyone can post what-ever they want where ever they want?
LOL are you the new diversity czar?
6 posted on
09/19/2009 12:54:28 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: holly101
I am sure DU would accept you for 10 or 15 seconds.
7 posted on
09/19/2009 12:54:55 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
To: holly101
Isn’t there a way for you to determine what categories you view?
8 posted on
09/19/2009 12:55:18 PM PDT by
ChocChipCookie
(When a president must hire out his real job to 32 czars, he was never CEO material.)
To: holly101
Well after reading you post I must say Joel is a waste of band width, and your other points are well taken.
9 posted on
09/19/2009 12:55:37 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(Joe Wilson Truth Czar for a Free Republic!)
To: holly101
Yesterday I had a boil on my ass lanced. I’m able to sit on one of those blow-up doughnut rings today though, so I think I’m going to be OK.
10 posted on
09/19/2009 12:55:38 PM PDT by
Miss Behave
(i wuv u. i bam bam bam u wiff muh paw now.)
To: holly101
A vanity against vanities!
11 posted on
09/19/2009 12:55:46 PM PDT by
dawn53
To: holly101
Meowwwwwwwwwww kittty kittttty
12 posted on
09/19/2009 12:55:51 PM PDT by
italianquaker
(“Every inch of this Administration is rife with corruption and cronyism.” --- Michelle Malkin)
To: holly101
You’re correct....the vanity blog posts are completely out of control....as are the video-without-text posts....and “Satire” posts which are 99 out of 100 times, completely retarded.
13 posted on
09/19/2009 12:56:07 PM PDT by
Psycho_Bunny
(ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
To: holly101
Even religous post like the daily rants of Joel Osteen, (whom I detest because he's a fake getting rich off gullible Americans)is allowed to be posted on a regular basis but you're not allowed to refute anything he says. Why is he not being put in religion where he belongs? *******************
Uh, those threads ARE in the Religion Forum.
15 posted on
09/19/2009 12:56:42 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: holly101
oh crap, you just opened up a big ol’ can of................
mrs
16 posted on
09/19/2009 12:56:51 PM PDT by
proudmilitarymrs
(New Jersey has no soul, only taxes)
To: holly101
>Even religous post like the daily rants of Joel Osteen, (whom I detest because he’s a fake getting rich off gullible Americans)is allowed to be posted on a regular basis but you’re not allowed to refute anything he says.
You know that bugs me too; if there IS a doctrinal error [ie heresy] it SHOULD be addressed.
17 posted on
09/19/2009 12:56:57 PM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: holly101
you weren’t banned, just put in General/ Chat. A couple years ago, the default , at least on my computer went to “all articles,” rather than “News/ Activism.” No matter how many times I try to reset it, all articles from all categories come up the next time I go to FR. You have to look in upper right corner to weed out; I’ll bet Osteen is actually in “Religion, “ the moderators are quick to triage.
18 posted on
09/19/2009 12:57:04 PM PDT by
gusopol3
To: holly101
You do realize that you can view just news articles, right? I am fine with people using the blogger’s and chat. If the powers that be didn’t want them, they wouldn’t have those categories. Frankly, with the media being as piss poor as it is, it takes the average Joe citizen to find the real news.
As for ‘the “new”’, I’ve been here since 88(changed my name in 2001 which is why the date there) and it has always had stories from non traditional outlets. True, ‘blogs’ have picked up more in the past few years, but I attribute that to the fact that more people blog now, back in 88, the concept wasn’t even coined and very few people had vanity sites to post their own thoughts outside places like this.
FR evolves with the Internet, but it is still the same FR.
19 posted on
09/19/2009 12:57:15 PM PDT by
mnehring
To: holly101
I agree. It is as if Jim is gone and there is no leader anymore.
20 posted on
09/19/2009 12:58:07 PM PDT by
lolhelp
To: holly101
By the way, if you don’t like or don’t agree where something is put, click the abuse button. Maybe the mods just don’t know about it.
Also remember, if someone posts some strange thing in news versus religion, there is a positive. News doesn’t have the protections that religion has in terms of decorum. :->
21 posted on
09/19/2009 12:58:13 PM PDT by
mnehring
To: holly101
There’s a very simple way around vanities — simply click on Breaking News (News/Activism), then make it your bookmark for Free Republic.
Sheesh!
24 posted on
09/19/2009 12:58:48 PM PDT by
Harpo Speaks
(Honk! Honk! Honk! Either it's foggy out, or make that a dozen hard boiled eggs.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson