Posted on 09/02/2009 9:48:47 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen
WND has found new evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham, President Obama's mother, was in Seattle in August 1961, within days of her son's birth, contrary to the accepted narrative.
In a video that has been removed from the Internet since the 2008 presidential campaign, Susan Blake, a high school friend of Obama's mother, gave an interview in which she discussed seeing Dunham shortly after Barack Obama Jr.'s Aug. 4, 1961, birth.
Blake explains in the video that Dunham visited her in Seattle in a "late August afternoon" when Barack Obama Jr. was only "a few weeks old."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
“Content Unavailable”?
I thought this was debunked as it was actually over a month after his birth based on when the school session actually started. The mistake came that it was hard to read the document on if it was an 8 or 9 on the month, but confirmed with the school it was actually September (not August) when the school session started.
So? This proves they were never married? What does that have to do with the birth certificate issues?
Sorry for my ignorance on why this matters, but it proves...?
If it proves they weren’t married, then that doesn’t at all help the argument/case some are making that Obama Sr. passed along his British citizenship.
So, what else is new?! Obamites won’t do anything but get on their knees and raise their behinds up in the air for the Chicago mobsters occupying the WH.
In my view, it wouldn't prove anything, but it would open the possibility he was born in Vancouver. Stanley Ann wasn't old enough to transmit citizenship on her own to a foreign born infant, so he wouldn't be natural born. At least that's my understanding.
It certainly casts doubt on the manufactured “narrative” of young Barry’s nativity. It does, possibly, jive with Michelle-Omarosa’s statement that Barry’s mom was “very single” when Barry was born.
And Obamah is picking a fight with them!
One day! ...one day.
You mean he’s a.....bahstard.
__________________________
Canada Free Press
JB Williams
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.
(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.
(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.
(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.
(Snip)
WHO WILL SAVE FREEDOM?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.
(Snip)
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Phil Berg and Gary Kreep, ALL OF WHOM HAVE MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP.
(Snip)
A PRECIOUS FEW, BUT THEY EXIST… and the walls are indeed closing in on Obama and his evil cabal. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FAIL TO GET BEHIND THESE BRAVE FEW WHO ARE SEEKING PEACEFUL REDRESS, ALL THE PEACEFUL OPTIONS WILL EVAPORATE AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. WE WILL RETURN TO A PRE-1776 AMERICA OVERNIGHT..
Do YOU fear Obama?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
___________________________________
A precious few, indeed. Lets get behind those few brave patriots who are out there in the trenches every day working to prove Obama’s inelgibility:
Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials!
Today’s radio interview in Israel with Dr. Orly.
Discusses bc, Obama not elgible due to being British citizen, death threats, Obots tampering with her car:
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Radio/News.aspx/1302
Dr. Orly Taitz storms Israel making a clear case for Obama (TV)
inelgibility- Obama is a British citizen.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880
Dr. Orly’s official website:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Or Dr. Orly’s blog:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
_____________________________
There's a general aura of suspicion, so people are interested in any details that start to look questionable, or different-from-what-we-were-told-before.
I don't think it's any sort of top theory, but I think one theory was that Obama was born in Vancouver and that his mother showing up in Seattle so soon after the birth was seen as possible evidence for a nearby birth.
Take it for what it's worth. The bottomline is that all of these questions and all of this doubt would go away if he'd just release his long form BC. But he won't do that.
From www.visaus.com (re: naturalization):
********************************************
An illegitimate child is considered eligible to become a U.S. citizen if:
1. The child was born after December 23, 1952, and the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child’s birth and had been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of one year prior to the child’s birth, or
2. The father is a U.S. citizen and:
a. The child was born on or after November 15, 1968;
b. A parent-child relationship was established on or after November 14, 1986;
c. Blood relationship is established by clear and convincing evidence;
d. The father was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child’s birth; the father, unless deceased, agrees in writing to support the child until he or she reaches the age of 18;
e. Before the child reaches 18, the child is legitimized under the law of the child’s residence or domicile, the father acknowledges paternity of the child in writing under oath, or the child’s paternity is established by adjudication of a competent court.
In 1994, Congress provided for the expeditious naturalization of children and for restoration of U.S. citizenship for those who did not fulfill retention requirements. Those laws became effective March 1, 1995.
******************************
If Barack, Jr. was illegitimate, it looks to me like Stanley Ann couldn't legally pass citizenship to him. The conditions required in Section 2 seems improbable in this case, too. I'm beginning to think the smart money is on the "expeditious naturalization" mentioned in the last paragraph. Barack, Sr.'s nationality might be completely unrelated to Obama's qualifications for office.
bttt
That applies only to those born outside of the United States. There is, and has never been, anyway that a person can be born in the United States, to an American mother, and not be a Citizen.
The only way a child born in the United States might not be an American Citizen, is if he/she was born outside of its jurisdiction. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. 14th Amendment, §1.
The only way you can be born in the United States, and not be "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" is to be born to a foreign ambassador, who is a representative of another sovereign power, and not under the jurisdiction of the United States, or to be born to a foreigner, in territory of the United States occupied by a foreign power. If the Japanese occupation troop in the Aleutian Islands included any Japanese women, who gave birth, those children would not be United States citizens.
It really is that simple.
Ooops!
It's highly suggestive evidence that Stanley and Barrack Sr. were having marital difficulties, and the Stanley got away from her husband as quickly as she could. Since she had a support network of former high school friends in Seattle, it makes it the logical place to flee.
It's kind of interesting from a biographical standpoint, but you're right, it doesn't help the birther case.
One birther here, forgot who, was claiming it was evidence that Bambi was born in Canada. Never mind that Seattle is not in Canada...
How do you figure? Seattle isn't Vancouver.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.