Skip to comments.
Art or Obscenity? A Nude Model Is Arrested At The Met
LATimes ^
| August 27, 2009
Posted on 08/27/2009 1:29:33 PM PDT by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
1
posted on
08/27/2009 1:29:33 PM PDT
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
Was she guilty or not guilty?
2
posted on
08/27/2009 1:32:05 PM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(Bitter Clunker Clinger all wee-wee'd up, Palin/Cheney 2012)
To: Steelfish
Well, if she was violating their rules it could be trespassing. Being naked in NYC is not illegal I think. If the model and photographers were engaged in a business venture without the buildings/museum permit it could be a lawsuit.
3
posted on
08/27/2009 1:32:09 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Liberalism: The gift that keeps on taking ... .. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: Steelfish
Uh... how bout some pics... just to ascertain guilt or not..
4
posted on
08/27/2009 1:32:13 PM PDT
by
Mmogamer
(<This space for lease>)
To: Steelfish
5
posted on
08/27/2009 1:34:18 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Mmogamer
nope. FR doesn’t allow nude pics...
6
posted on
08/27/2009 1:34:28 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(Obama acted stupidly...and that's after knowing all the facts.)
To: Steelfish; GeronL
Sounds like a grandstanding “artist” to me. Also, I suspect there are fees for photoshoots in the Met, clothed or unclothed, and he probably just didn’t want to pay them.
7
posted on
08/27/2009 1:34:34 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Steelfish
“It’s a project I’ve been working on for three months now — it’s the idea that nudity isn’t necessarily perverse or sexual,”
####
Wow.
Aren’t you just the hippest, edgiest, most revolutionary thinker around.
No one said nudity is perverse or sexual ONLY. Only a closed-minded leftist obsessed with sex would think in that manner
But centuries of human history have recognized the wisdom of keeping it private.
8
posted on
08/27/2009 1:34:55 PM PDT
by
EyeGuy
To: Mmogamer
Uh... how bout some pics... just to ascertain guilt or not..
Posted purely as a public service. Innocent as a fluffy kitten in pure, driven snow.
9
posted on
08/27/2009 1:35:11 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Steelfish
The photo shoot was conducted by Brooklyn-based photographer Zach HymanAs Dave Barry sez: "I'm not making this up".
To: Clint N. Suhks
http://www.zhfoto.com/
Soooo not guilty.
11
posted on
08/27/2009 1:36:09 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Clint N. Suhks
12
posted on
08/27/2009 1:36:27 PM PDT
by
Vn_survivor_67-68
(CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
To: Steelfish
I noticed at Auburn University that the Art Dept. sure doesn’t pay the nude models very much. A few years ago it was $15 per hour which must translate to 15 per session which doesn’t make it worth going over to the studio.
13
posted on
08/27/2009 1:36:50 PM PDT
by
Monterrosa-24
( ...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
To: Steelfish
Hyman didn't have formal permission to photograph in the museum... Guerrilla filming is frowned upon, but you can get away with it if discreet. Nude guerrilla filming is a little over the top and methinks the so called artist wanted the free publicist.
14
posted on
08/27/2009 1:36:51 PM PDT
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: r9etb
aren’t you kinda proving the point that it is obscene if you need to use black rectangles?
15
posted on
08/27/2009 1:37:34 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(Obama acted stupidly...and that's after knowing all the facts.)
To: livius
Typical cheap liberal jerk.
16
posted on
08/27/2009 1:38:55 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Obamacare: all the efficiency of the DMV and all the compassion of the IRS.)
To: Steelfish
Well, it depends on what she looks like.
If she weighed 300 lbs, she should have been arrested. If she looked like Monica Crowley, probably not.
17
posted on
08/27/2009 1:39:23 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: Izzy Dunne
18
posted on
08/27/2009 1:40:01 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: eddie willers
if you go to the source, he was taking nude pictures on the subway, previously. Probably the transit police are more forgiving, considering what they have to put up with every day.
19
posted on
08/27/2009 1:41:16 PM PDT
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
To: Steelfish
From the article,
For every photo shoot he does and theres been a few he always keeps his attorney on speed dial and some extra cash on hand, just in case.
Sounds to me as if he knew this would cause trouble. Just guessing, but part of his schtick seems to be to create *news* for himself.
20
posted on
08/27/2009 1:42:13 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson