Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Obama wears shorts on summer vacation. And some people are outraged. Sigh.
LA Times ^ | 8/19/09 | staff

Posted on 08/19/2009 9:33:07 AM PDT by pissant

Seems some people are actually outraged, outraged that First Lady Michelle Obama dared to bare so much leg by wearing shorts on a recent trip to the sweltering Grand Canyon.

OMG. First she wears a sleeveless dress, now this?

But think about this for a minute. What should she have worn to the Grand Canyon? A tweed pantsuit? A ballgown? What do you wear on your summer vacation?


(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: bhovacation; chickenlegs; cow; fashion; firstfrump; firstslob; flotusmichelle; ghettogirl; larrysinclairslover; michelleobama; moooooooo; obama; obamafamily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-215 next last
To: AnAmericanMother

There is a reason why “skort” sounds a lot like “dork,” I don’t care for her taste, either, But anyone who would complain about what she is wearing has never had the misfortune to be in Arizona in the summer. And if you’re going to be climbing around anything, in and out of an SUV, for instance, when there are a lot of photographers and video cameras around, you don’t want to be wearing a skirt or a dress. Ahem.


61 posted on 08/19/2009 9:57:15 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

And that’s the photo-shopped version... The actual photo would probably make you puke!


62 posted on 08/19/2009 9:57:41 AM PDT by jerod (They were pro-abortion, for gun control & wanted a cleaner environment at all cost - The NAZI party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Ah, they’re just “slumming it”.

The kiddies and Michele are being what they are ....


63 posted on 08/19/2009 9:58:23 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I don’t think the shortness was the problem with them? This is a good photo of them, others show how tight they were.


64 posted on 08/19/2009 9:58:57 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I am outraged that she gets off AF1 in less than proper attire. She and the kid could have waited until they got to their destination to go casual.


65 posted on 08/19/2009 9:59:41 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (Idiotcracy has arrived 400 years early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I don’t see a thing wrong w/ her shorts. I think what she is wearing is fine for the occasion. Good gravy, we shouldn’t be as nit picky as the libs.

If she was wearing hot pants or exposing her belly button...then comment...but the above photo shows nothing distasteful about her clothing choice.


66 posted on 08/19/2009 10:00:12 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

That is a sad picture of the 1st lady. With 27 people on staff she could find a better look!


67 posted on 08/19/2009 10:00:51 AM PDT by thomas16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

I miss Laura Bush-she was one classy, classy first lady who respected the position of first lady.


68 posted on 08/19/2009 10:00:57 AM PDT by murrie (For God so loved the world, that he gave His only begotten Son..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Albertafriend

What happened to that great new hair do...?

It looked too much like Laura Bush’s.


69 posted on 08/19/2009 10:00:58 AM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You can tell who wears the pants in that “family” !


70 posted on 08/19/2009 10:02:38 AM PDT by timestax (CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

True. BUT. SHE IS THE FIRST LADY. SHE SHOULD DRESS BETTER THAN THIS!!!!! Yeah this is fine for hot Arizona, blah blah blah. But she is the prez wife! Laura Bush would have never shown up in such a getup.


71 posted on 08/19/2009 10:02:41 AM PDT by murrie (For God so loved the world, that he gave His only begotten Son..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“I wouldn’t wear that to mow my lawn.”

Wow, I am glad I don’t live near you. Do you polish your shoes before you jump on your riding mower?


72 posted on 08/19/2009 10:02:49 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“What should she have worn to the Grand Canyon?”

A burka!!!!


73 posted on 08/19/2009 10:04:00 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

I agree that capris with a stylish top would have been more appropriate. And is she wearing a purple plastic watch? The bigger issue here is she repeatedly has shown she doesn’t much care how she presents herself in public. She knew she’d be photographed but didn’t make the effort to do anything beyond a sloppy ponytail and clothes that I would have tossed in the Goodwill bag long ago. This outfit isn’t even appropriate for the grocery store — maybe it’s a southern thing.


74 posted on 08/19/2009 10:04:05 AM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear; tx_eggman

Not only pigeon-toed, but I swear I count 6 toes in the picture in post #44.

And, incidentally, I hope by your nick that you are a female.


75 posted on 08/19/2009 10:04:10 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: thomas16
Maybe her stylist stayed back ... er, maybe not.


76 posted on 08/19/2009 10:04:38 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: crescen7
I'm with you on the BS call. An unidentified "somebody" is expressing their supposed "outrage" in some unidentified way at an unidentified time about FLOTUS' frumpy vacation attire?

Sounds more like the LA Times's lazy, ethically-challenged blogger Elizabeth Snead just had to come up with something quick to write about in order to justify her paycheck, and contriving a contention out of thin air which no one would be able to prove one way or the other seemed like a cheap & easy way for her to score a phony hit on eeeeeevil conservatives.

And the people working at this rag wonder why they're on the ropes financially?

If you'd like to write about 'outrage', Ms. Snead, how about interviewing your fellow employees who are about to lose their livelihoods because of the professional incomptence to which you & your colleagues routinely subject the reading public.

77 posted on 08/19/2009 10:04:44 AM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No one is outraged, the LA Times is just floating a trial balloon (i.e., trying to paint the Obamas as victims of hate)...


78 posted on 08/19/2009 10:05:17 AM PDT by BertWheeler (Dance and the world dances with you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wardenclyffe

Wardenclyffe: ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!


79 posted on 08/19/2009 10:05:50 AM PDT by SanFranDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

But she is not getting ready to jump on a riding lawn mower. She is the wife of the president of the USA. She represents us/ our country. She has a staff, she has money, she has time and resources to take pride in herself and in her position. IMHO this speaks volumes about her attitude towards her position and her country. As my dear departed father used to say, straighten up, fly right, BE A LADY and act like you are someone!


80 posted on 08/19/2009 10:06:10 AM PDT by murrie (For God so loved the world, that he gave His only begotten Son..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson