Obama birth certificate issue not going away

Baltimore Christian Conservative Examiner ^ | July 21, 2009 | Larry Amon

[curiosity]

Nope. He never went by the name Soetero while at Occidental College.

[Seeing More Clearly Now]

Is the one on the left a younger Malcolm or Barack?

[MHGinTN]

Ahhh

[nufsed]

Who are you arguing with? I showed that your comment was wrong. Obama did not present a birth certificate. I can't believe you post on this thread and post that comment. What have you been reading? Can you get someone to explain the information to you, especially the difference betwen the COLB and a birth certificate?

You're becoming embarassing.

[real_patriotic_american]

You have posted a number of complete lies here! Are you one of Obama’s public relations crew?

[Star Traveler]

You said — Then you are saying his right to keep it hidden, if there is a BC, supersedes the U. S. Constitution.

—

Yeah, actually, the way it stands right now, it’s legal for him to keep it to himself. Or, again, to put it another way, there is nothing that legally compels him to show his birth certificate in this matter.

It doesn’t supersede the Constitution, because the Constitution doesn’t specify that he must show his birth certificate. It just says that he must be qualified (per the stated requirements). There’s nothing to supersede, since he’s already signed legal paperwork saying he’s qualified.

And you know that when the Constitution was written, there couldn’t have been any requirements (in the Constitution) to show birth certificates, because you wouldn’t necessarily even have one to show...

All it could say is that the requirements be met. And also, you need to keep in mind that if none of the other candidates in the past showed a birth certificate (although some have volunteered to show them), then there was obviously no requirement to do so...

[Know et al]

Show me where in the Constitution it says that a candidate must prove his citizenship and who he must prove it to.

Now, you are arguing just for the sake of arguing.

[bgill]

What takes him out of the ball game is the “natural born citizen.” He has loyalties to the US as well as Britain/Kenya.

There will be those who will claim the SCOTUS hasn’t made a determination on “natural born citizen” and whine that good ol’ Chester got by with it so Hussein should get a pass as well. Through the decades, long before Birthers, the accepted definition of “natural born citizen” that took it a step further than “native born” was that both parents be US citizens.

[curiosity]

You have posted a number of complete lies here!

Please name them.

[MHGinTN]

Curiosity didn't expect to get called on that little lie:
"2A Have you ever been known by any other first, middle or last name?"

[real_patriotic_american]

Obama DID NOT present a birth certificate! He presented a COLB which a non citizen can get. His COLB does not state where he was born or whom the doctor was. Why is Obama spending so much in legal fees to keep his birth certificate hidden. That speaks for itself.

[MHGinTN]

Opinions are like ass holes, everyone has one. BUT the actual questions and their position on the app say you are mistaken ... or pitching deceit to cover for your obamessiah.

[bgill]

Obama finally relents and produces his birth certificate and it is legitimate.

It's not about the BC, it's about his lack of "natural born" citizenship.

[curiosity]

'According to the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, the "full former name(s)" field is reserved for names which have previously appeared on the Illinois Master Roll of Attorneys and is NOT meant to include any names adoption prior to obtaining a license to practice law in Illinois.'

Source:

http://www.americasright.com/2008/08/berg-v-obama-update-wednesday-august-27.html

[Prodigal Son]

I am quite capable of understanding what the argument is about thank you.

[Bubba Ho-Tep]

Everything I have found in my own searching slaps it down.

Exactly. The transcript that the birthers produce is not complete. As I recall, immediately after grandma alleged says she was there, which is the point where the usual quotes end, the guy asks if that's what she's really saying, and she immediately contradicts, saying "No, I was here, he was in Hawaii. What are you talking about?" I think it's all on Youtube.

[bgill]

Especially when there are much more productive battles to fight.

Name one more productive battle than one for the Constitution of the United States.

[MHGinTN]

Non-Sequitur has admitted that he/she/it comes to these threads as a means to amuse him/her/itself by fomenting as much fuss as he/she/it can.

[curiosity]

Opinions are like ass holes, everyone has one.

True, but not all opinions matter. In this case, the opinion of the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission would seem to matter much more than yours.

BUT the actual questions and their position on the app say you are mistaken

And the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission says you are.

[rolling_stone]

You are mistaken:
http://www.americasright.com/2008/08/berg-v-obama-update-wednesday-august-27.html

No you are mistaken. Check the exact wording of the question. Your liberal pals claimed to have made a “phone call” to Illinois Bar. The reason for the question involves checking backgrounds for criminal records and verifying other information, not whether they practiced law under another name.
Check other states for the same question. Go back to DU school, you are flunking.