Posted on 07/17/2009 10:51:17 AM PDT by Wardenclyffe
I.Q. scores have been rising steadily, by about 3 points per decade, ever since they were first administered. This is known as the Flynn Effect and it means that if we take the average teenager of today with an I.Q. of 100 and project the trend back to the 1900s, the average I.Q. would have been somewhere between 50 and 70. An I.Q. of 70 or below usually marks a mental disability. So, if I.Q. gains are in any sense real, "we are driven to the absurd conclusion that a majority of our ancestors were mentally retarded."
(Excerpt) Read more at thenakedscientists.com ...
Projecting back would be a problem in any case. To take a short term gain and assume it for long term history is ridiculous, unless you have very strong reasons for thinking that the rate of change was steady over time. And there is no reason to believe that in this case.
Do you have proof that todays 8th grader couldn’t as you presume? Or are you using that already debinked multiple times 8th grader exam from Salina as your evidence?
debinked=debunked
I thought IQ scores were statistically based: 100 meant you made the average score, 115 meant you were one standard deviation above the mean, 130 two standard deviations. How can such scores rise?
ML/NJ
A person can’t pass an exam if he hasn’t learned the facts and skills tested, irrespective of the person’s basic intelligence.
I believe that students of today are not as well educated as students of 1900, and I will stick to that conclusion.
Back in 1900, HS graduates were a lot less prevalent than they are today. In truth, graduating HS was probably today’s equivalent of a BS degree (from some schools).
Being taught them and being able to learn them are two completely seperate things. Or did you not learn that? The simple fact is the only way you woulod be able to quantify your statement is to take a group of students from today and teach them as they were taught in 1900 and compare results. Something you can not do.
So as I said you statement stands with out merit.
I don’t think the Flynn effect is as damning to the validity of IQ testing as many think. IQ is a combination of two things - learned information and innate g. More properly, I should say that it is an indicator of g that is modified by the application of learned information. A good IQ test, however, doesn’t rely on learned information (i.e. book knowledge) as much as it does innate thinking skills - which maximises the contribution from g. The Flynn effect reflects a rise in the absolute education standard in America, but I think it probably represents not so much a raising of actual IQ as it reflects a lessening of the DEPRESSION of tested IQ because of lower education standards.
Ok aft_lizard, you win. Sorry to have troubled you.
I agree with your statement on critical thinking skills. Increasing higher order thinking skills is something that needs to be addressed. Instead of outcome-based educational goals, teachers should be taught how to increase critical thinking skills of their students by various means.
Totally agree. An ounce of thinking skills would do more than a pound of $100 bills.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
By renorming the test. I’ve seen articles lately that have said that there are indications that the Flynn effect is now reversing. Nobody knows what to make of it.
Too often we give our children answers to remember rather than problems to solve. - Roger Lewin
ML/NJ
>>students of today are not taught things like basic geography<<
The other day I caught a few minutes of the gameshow “Family Feud.” With the game on the line, the families were asked to name four countries, other than America, that begin with the letter “A.” One family got Argentina but then struck out with blank stares and guesses like “Asia.” The other family then got the chance to win the game by coming up with just one of the remaining answers. After putting their heads together and racking their collective brains... they guessed Amsterdam.
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.