The evidence may be scrubbed, but the forgers have been drubbed!
1 posted on
07/14/2009 4:03:41 PM PDT by
Polarik
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Polarik
26 posted on
07/14/2009 4:41:33 PM PDT by
Shqipo
(When Conservatives bicker and stay away from the polls, the country dies a little faster.)
To: Polarik
I have suspected that something is real funny about the Obama birth, but it will be interesting to see how this plays out in history and the Dem's have too much control of the key states, congress and the courts to allow the truth and violation of the Constitution to get in the way of their plan.
29 posted on
07/14/2009 4:43:01 PM PDT by
Robert357
(D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
To: Polarik
"Asking about this again will invoke Ferrenge Rule 208"
31 posted on
07/14/2009 4:47:33 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: Polarik
Outstanding, Pol...I read your work like a good novel...Non-Fiction, of course.
I cannot speak for everyone, but I am damned glad you are on it. Beyond that, there are no words to express appreciation.
Here's to you...
33 posted on
07/14/2009 4:51:03 PM PDT by
IrishPennant
(RLT = Radical Left Terrorism...feel it????)
To: Polarik
I was reading on Drudge that a Major is refusing to be deployed because he does not believe that BO is legally the president and that if he goes into action he could have war crimes brought against him. We need to have more and more of these challenges to his birth and legal presidency. If every military person stood up and refused to be deployed they would have to settle this would they not?
To: Polarik
37 posted on
07/14/2009 4:56:18 PM PDT by
TruthWillWin
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
To: Polarik
This can’t be true, because there’s a consensus at Wikipedia that all this birth certificate stuff is simply a “fringe theory.” [/sarc]
39 posted on
07/14/2009 5:00:21 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: Polarik
46 posted on
07/14/2009 5:06:52 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( Don't mess with the mockingbird! /\/\ http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
To: Polarik
Sometimes it pays to attack from multiple angles. I would also ask, why did Hawaii’s Republican Governor go along with this? What could they have on her that would make her keep quiet?
48 posted on
07/14/2009 5:10:05 PM PDT by
Clock King
(There's no way to fix D.C.)
To: Polarik
You would think Obama would have the resources to at least have a professional do the forgery. He must be very angry that no one is getting worked up over this. Bizzaro world right back at you O.
52 posted on
07/14/2009 5:14:35 PM PDT by
TBall
To: Polarik
Now for my serious response.
Who is the judge that will rule in this case?
Which President appointed him?
More members of the military need to defy the Impostor-In-Chief. The military is supposed to protect We the People and the Constitution. In order to protect both, the military must defy the Liberal Messiah.
53 posted on
07/14/2009 5:15:37 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: Polarik; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; autumnraine; AZ .44 MAG; azishot; backhoe; Beckwith; ...
55 posted on
07/14/2009 5:15:45 PM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 175 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: Polarik
If there is some piece of information about BHO’s birth that is inconvenient, besides where he was really born, the easy way is for him to allow a small number of people we all can trust to take an oath of confidentiality and allow them to review the document, making public only those facts that witness to the status of his birth.
But, it would appear that BHO and his supporters would rather continue to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to run interference at each point of challenge. What do their actions say far more loudly than the words of their denial?
This whole thing stinks. The last insult is how reluctant the judiciary is in allow any of these cases to go forward to discovery. Did I mention how much this stinks, and how dangerous this is for the political health of our society and how corrosive it is with respect to the integrity of the Constitution?
To: Polarik; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
59 posted on
07/14/2009 5:33:45 PM PDT by
narses
(http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
To: Polarik
All techniques aside, even a child can see that there is no way that the heavily embossed Seal and pronounced second fold line in the document object shown in the photos would NOT show up in a scan of it. As you know, the "scan image" -- the one and only image to which all people refer -- had a barely visible Seal impression, and absolutely and unequivocally, NO 2nd FOLD LINE. I've been following all your reports, but I have to ask this question regarding the folds. Pardon my own made-up terminology.
How would an "inside fold" differ from an "outside fold" when scanned? The COLB in the fold had an accordian-fold, the top fold being an "outside fold" and the bottom fold being an "inside fold." The top fold's crease would be raised towards the scanner, while the bottom fold's crease would be on the back side of the document, showing the concave side towards the scanner.
I'm not a detractor, you know, but I wonder how the different folds would show up (or not) on scans.
-PJ
69 posted on
07/14/2009 5:48:50 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(This just in... Voting Republican is a Terrorist act!)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
87 posted on
07/14/2009 6:32:27 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Polarik
91 posted on
07/14/2009 6:33:52 PM PDT by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: Polarik; ExTexasRedhead; gonzo
Bump for later read .............. FRegards
114 posted on
07/14/2009 9:26:57 PM PDT by
gonzo
( Buy more ammo! You should already have the guns .................. FRegards)
To: Polarik
Your good, will read more of it later. Very interesting stuff and hope it leads to more on O.
To: Polarik
Good stuff, good doctor.
I’ve made sure to add you to the “usurper” blogroll in the I.O. Sidebar at http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com
I’m concerned that something big is afoot — some sort of switch may have been pulled — by good guys or bad. I’ll probably comment there.
117 posted on
07/14/2009 10:16:43 PM PDT by
unspun
(PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson