I still cannot find anything that corroborates the earlier post and I have been looking for two hours.
Snopes came up in the search and it was posted by others my myself and others as a source that determined this was not a valid article.
There other methods I suppose we could use but, like I said, I am unable to find anything that proves the earlier post.
I think I am pretty good at verifying and having been on the Internet for 13-14 years have come to a realization
“That one shouldn't believe everything they see”.
So I ask again “Where is the beef?”.
You know that I mean no offense, whatsoever, but I am compelled to question this as it would have more than just FR talking about it or some website I have never heard of. Yet.
Post on.
Anyone with an Internet connection and a lot of time on their hands can do a quantum leap better than what they are doing.
I say that because they are (a) gravy-training off of other sites - if not lifting quotes verbatim, from Factcheck and Politifact, and (b) they embellish it with all of the same smarmy, smart-ass remarks and nonsensical nonsequiturs that liberals try to pass off as "logic," or worse, as "evidence."
They are so full of themselves that they create images of all the text they write so no one can copy their drivel. How cool is that?
Well, not very, because it can be copied from the source. As I did below.
Everything you need to know about them can be found in two very important questions they totally and completely botched, proving to one and all that they, too, are in-the-tank for Obama.
In the first half of 2008, a number of rumors swirling around about presidential candidate Barack Obama coalesced in the claim that he "refused to produce his birth records" because doing so would demonstrate some or all of those rumors to be true: that Barack Obama was "not African," that he was a Muslim with a middle name of Mohammed, that he wasn't born in the United States at all (and thus didn't qualify as a native-born citizen), etc.
They can't even get the rumors right, making their answers basically worthless. Nobody ever said anything about Obama "not being African." Before Obama posted IS a Muslim. Who cares about the name Muhammed?" He's already got a Muslim name: Hussien. The argument is not about NATIVE-BORN, but NATURAL-BORN. Entirely different. They also put "refused to produce his birth records" as if that never happened before he posted his forgery. He still refuses to produce his actual birth records.
Aside from the inherent absurdity of such claims (i.e., that a major party presidential nominee would risk his entire candidacy on a fraud that could be uncovered simply by a check of state health records), the supposedly incriminating details don't pan out.
Yeah, Snopes. There is nothing "SIMPLE" about checking his state health records -- it's IMPOSSIBLE!
And, then the recurring nonsequitur of how a "major party presidential nominee would risk his entire candidcacy on a fraud..."
Hello? That's exacty what he's done, Moonbats! Fraud after fraud and lie after lie. Nothing is REAL about Obama.
Besides copying what Factcheck wrote, they, of course, refer back to them for proof: "Those who have actually touched and examined the original certificate have verified and documented that it bears all the elements of a valid certificate of live birth."
I call this trackback to Factcheck, the Factcheck circle-jerk. Everybody does it.