Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: Red in Blue PA
That’s why I have 10 kids. ;)
To: Red in Blue PA
I feel that now is a good time to announce that I don’t have any children.
3 posted on
07/10/2009 9:44:47 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: Red in Blue PA
They probably get it once a year.
4 posted on
07/10/2009 9:45:05 AM PDT by
boomop1
To: Red in Blue PA
Is the researcher ugly or handsome?
6 posted on
07/10/2009 9:45:28 AM PDT by
Raycpa
To: Red in Blue PA
7 posted on
07/10/2009 9:45:46 AM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Red in Blue PA
I have two quick conclusions:
1) The scientists who did this study are ugly.
2) The scientists who did this study are stupid.
8 posted on
07/10/2009 9:45:50 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(I don't believe anything anyone says about anything anymore.)
To: Red in Blue PA
9 posted on
07/10/2009 9:46:47 AM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: Red in Blue PA
Looks like I’m goin’ barhoppin’ tonight!
To: Red in Blue PA
First, what an outstanding piece of journalism. Tabloid Pulitzer coming your way.
Second, I am sure the next question on the minds of engaged intelligent readers was “what do ugly females increase?”
Hangovers, my friend. Hangovers.
12 posted on
07/10/2009 9:47:21 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Red in Blue PA
Researchers think good-looking males are biologically geared to hold back their sperm in each encounter to increase their chance of impregnating more females. What about handsome guys like me who save their sperm for only one special female?
14 posted on
07/10/2009 9:47:30 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: Red in Blue PA
They probably get it once a year.
15 posted on
07/10/2009 9:48:13 AM PDT by
boomop1
To: Red in Blue PA
it might explain the beauty & the beast phenomenon.
To: Red in Blue PA
I feel sorry for the lab techs who had to process samples for THAT study....
To: Red in Blue PA
I don’t even want to know how they gathered data for this study.
19 posted on
07/10/2009 9:48:57 AM PDT by
Zeddicus
To: Red in Blue PA
So, uhmmm... I'm neither terribly good or bad looking, but I have a great interest in gaining the ability that ugly men have.
I believe it will impress my girl.
Are there any products available to assist me in this endeavor?
Risky internet offers would be considered.
22 posted on
07/10/2009 9:49:28 AM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Red in Blue PA
Um, exactly how did the researchers determine which chickens and fish were the ugly ones?
To: Red in Blue PA
I wonder if they’ve taken into account guys like Mick Jagger and Steven Tyler, who are 1)ugly as sin, but 2) well aware that they can get some whenever they want
To: Red in Blue PA
...finally some good news.
25 posted on
07/10/2009 9:49:59 AM PDT by
americanophile
(Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
To: Red in Blue PA
“Attractiveness” is subjective. Saying that “good-looking males are biologically geared to hold back their sperm” is absurd since there is no way that a person's bio systems could know that they are “good-looking”. This article has got to be one of the most ridiculous “scientific” reports that I've ever seen.
26 posted on
07/10/2009 9:50:12 AM PDT by
Sopater
(I'm so sick of atheists shoving their religion in my face.)
To: Red in Blue PA
But unattractive males know they are not going to bed so many females — so when they do get lucky they give it all they've got. I won't argue with the data, but this "explanation" is ridiculous.
How do a guy's testicles "know" he's ugly?
27 posted on
07/10/2009 9:50:12 AM PDT by
r9etb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
