But he admits that there will be a lot of work to do before we can manipulate space-time in a way that makes “hops” possible.
That is going to be the most important scientific discovery in history. Each of us could hop over to his own personal utopia, whatever that is. You name it, you've got it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: LibWhacker
Well then perhaps we could build a bridge to the 0bamaverse, because, for too long we’ve been status quoing in this one and some folks just can’t tolerate it any more.
“It’s a cookbook!” LOL.
2 posted on
05/21/2009 1:45:55 PM PDT by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
To: LibWhacker
The Underverse?
3 posted on
05/21/2009 1:46:58 PM PDT by
icwhatudo
To: LibWhacker
“a consequence of models”, eh? well, that settles it. only establishing a consensus would be more convincing than that
To: LibWhacker
So science does like metaphysics after all!
If it’s on their terms.
To: LibWhacker
6 posted on
05/21/2009 1:48:16 PM PDT by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: LibWhacker
7 posted on
05/21/2009 1:49:35 PM PDT by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: LibWhacker
A subatomic particle only occupies the space that Obama allows. Any physicist can tell you that.
To: LibWhacker
Apparently a few people are already getting through from the other side. How else to explain this?
9 posted on
05/21/2009 1:50:45 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
To: LibWhacker
10 posted on
05/21/2009 1:54:34 PM PDT by
Bratch
To: LibWhacker
merely that space is infinite This one line got me thinking. Infinite means infinite, so one could conceivably travel forever. (Some people think space curves in on itself, but that would be a finite volume, like a balloon.)
11 posted on
05/21/2009 1:56:20 PM PDT by
scan59
(Markets regulate better than government can.)
To: LibWhacker
I realize that the knowledge that we have is like a grain of sand on a beach compared to all the knowledge that is to be had. That leaves lots of room for parallel universes. Are figments of our imagination more than figments of imagination?
12 posted on
05/21/2009 1:56:54 PM PDT by
pallis
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker; shibumi
It'll be useless unless you have the right map.
14 posted on
05/21/2009 1:59:41 PM PDT by
Salamander
(Cursed with Second Sight.)
To: LibWhacker
Is there a parallel universe where RINOs aren’t such weenies?
15 posted on
05/21/2009 1:59:45 PM PDT by
exist
To: LibWhacker
Timeline by Michael Crichton has an excellent description of this.
18 posted on
05/21/2009 2:05:49 PM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
20 posted on
05/21/2009 2:43:12 PM PDT by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
To: LibWhacker
But he admits that there will be a lot of work to do before we can manipulate space-time in a way that makes “hops” possible. Worlds separated by nanoseconds would be so similar a person wouldn't know if they had "hopped". Astronauts are a few seconds off - maybe a million worlds away - and yet "here"....
21 posted on
05/21/2009 3:14:45 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(If printing money was an answer, why don't Haitians "print" their way out of poverty?)
To: LibWhacker
The “many worlds” interpretation of quantum mechanics is an attempt to resolve the “measurement problem” by saying that all such measurements occur and define a branching reality. The quantum space time is reduced, or amplified, into a stupendously multifarious and phantasmogoric static space-time, and our subjective life journey is held to be an illusion, with the apparent “nowness” that we experience occurring at all times and places equally, and with equal conviction of uniqueness.
This construct bears no resemblance whatsoever to the popular notion of parallel universes, which includes the possibility of people and objects moving between them.
22 posted on
05/21/2009 3:39:44 PM PDT by
dr_lew
To: LibWhacker
Your own personal Utopia?
It reminds me of the movie "What Dreams May Come." An older Robin Williams flick. Good movie even though I can't stand his acting.
24 posted on
05/21/2009 3:53:39 PM PDT by
Sawdring
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
26 posted on
05/21/2009 5:40:24 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
