Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is globalism and "free trade" what's destroying the GOP? (America-first vanity)

Posted on 05/09/2009 12:47:21 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network

Yesterday I happened upon a post by a fellow FReeper. In retrospect, I am sorry for responding rudely to their post - and I hope they happen upon this apology.

The post was presenting their heartfelt opinion that American industry and our system itself must be allowed to come apart so that something better can replace it.

It was a Rand-ian position. The system is becoming oppressive, therefore we must weaken it.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: bush; clinton; freetrade; globalism; gop; outsourcing; readdailykos; reagan; reaganfetishists; reaganwas4freetrade; sellout; socialismnow; votenader2012; voteunionyes; waaaaah; welcomedulurkers; workersworldunite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 761-766 next last
To: calcowgirl
And take a look at the exchanges over the past few minutes. You asked a question, and I answered it honestly. And I'm "cornered" ?

In any case, the link for the following is in my comment #93 (man, that seems a long time ago):

One of the greatest contributions the United States can make to the world is to promote freedom as the key to economic growth. A creative, competitive America is the answer to a changing world, not trade wars that would close doors, create greater barriers, and destroy millions of jobs. We should always remember: Protectionism is destructionism. America's jobs, America's growth, America's future depend on trade—trade that is free, open, and fair. [emphasis added]

This year, we have it within our power to take a major step toward a growing global economy and an expanding cycle of prosperity that reaches to all the free nations of this Earth. I'm speaking of the historic free trade agreement negotiated between our country and Canada. And I can also tell you that we're determined to expand this concept, south as well as north. Next month I will be traveling to Mexico, where trade matters will be of foremost concern. And over the next several months, our Congress and the Canadian Parliament can make the start of such a North American accord a reality. Our goal must be a day when the free flow of trade, from the tip of Tierra del Fuego to the Arctic Circle, unites the people of the Western Hemisphere in a bond of mutually beneficial exchange, when all borders become what the U.S.-Canadian border so long has been: a meeting place rather than a dividing line.


641 posted on 05/12/2009 6:51:43 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

All trade is managed. Even the neighborhood kid who you pay under the table to paint your garage (about as “free” of an exchange as there can be) can still sue you if he falls and breaks his elbow.


642 posted on 05/12/2009 6:53:49 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
can one be a free-trader and protectionist at the same time?

Please ping me if he ever actually answers you. I'm afraid you're in for a lot of dancing.

643 posted on 05/12/2009 6:54:57 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

ping


644 posted on 05/12/2009 6:55:47 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

pong?


645 posted on 05/12/2009 7:00:48 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; PugetSoundSoldier
All trade is managed. Even the neighborhood kid who you pay under the table to paint your garage (about as “free” of an exchange as there can be) can still sue you if he falls and breaks his elbow.

Well, I was told by PSS that "managed trade" was socialism.

You would disagree with that, then?

646 posted on 05/12/2009 7:01:16 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

See post 633. He answered.


647 posted on 05/12/2009 7:02:09 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

648 posted on 05/12/2009 7:03:14 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Thanks.


649 posted on 05/12/2009 7:03:56 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Protectionism is destructionism.

Protectionism, from my reading, has usually been used to describe a situation where equalizing prices is the motivation behind tariffs. Reagan himself argued that such use of tariffs would make people complacent and ultimately that protection would lead to a certain laziness instead of continuously pursuing new methods or technolgies to gain a competitive edge (these are my words, but I hope you recognize the thoughts that he portrayed -- my memory is fuzzy as it's been quite a few years since reading this). I share that philosophy. But, in other instances, we saw Reagan rail about "unfair trade practices" and institute tariffs and other measures to compensate (steel, electronics, lumber, etc). From what I've seen from some free-traders on FR, people would be calling him a protectionist, an isolationist, a liberal, or a socialist -- or all of the above.

America's jobs, America's growth, America's future depend on trade—trade that is free, open, and fair.

My contention is that much of today's trade is subsidized through various tax policies. I mentioned a few -- port and transportation funding coming from taxpayers as opposed to being paid for by those receiving the direct benefit. It is for this reason that I don't think Ronald Reagan would be supportive of today's trade situation and would be railing about "unfair trade practices" in many areas.

650 posted on 05/12/2009 7:16:51 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
Speaker of the House, Hastert, tried to sweep it under the carpet we were in deep trouble and it’s only gotten progressively worse since then.

Cold Cash Jefferson agreed to vote for the Bankruptcy Reform Act which netted the banks a few extra billion. In return, the Repub's agreed to ignore his criminal acts. This is what Nancy Pelosi referred to as the culture of corruption.

Note no Republican ever took her to task ... they are now set for life with various consulting jobs and lobbying positions. Bastards

651 posted on 05/12/2009 7:17:39 PM PDT by investigateworld ( Abortion stops a beating heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
All trade is managed. Even the neighborhood kid who you pay under the table to paint your garage (about as “free” of an exchange as there can be) can still sue you if he falls and breaks his elbow.

Now I know someone spiked my coffee - I'm agreeing with 1rudeboy?

Oy!

652 posted on 05/12/2009 7:20:20 PM PDT by investigateworld ( Abortion stops a beating heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; Mojave
All trade is managed, in one form or another, and to one degree or another . . . the greater the degree, the more socialistic the management.

I'm sorry, but I really feel like I'm explaining the obvious . . . it requires popcorn to "digest" properly?

Really, Mojave, as far as personal attacks go it's pathetic.

653 posted on 05/12/2009 7:31:24 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Do you agree or disagree?


654 posted on 05/12/2009 8:08:26 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I'm sorry, but I really feel like I'm explaining the obvious . .

Nope. You're spouting nonsense in smearing Ronald Reagan's trade policies as "socialistic."

But you can't help yourself.

655 posted on 05/12/2009 8:12:11 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Do you agree or disagree?

Finish the sentence.

656 posted on 05/12/2009 8:13:15 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

You can’t help putting words in other people’s mouths. It does explain why you have an irrational fear of answering questions, though.


657 posted on 05/12/2009 8:14:25 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Listen to Mojave, you plebe! Finish!


658 posted on 05/12/2009 8:16:14 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You can’t help putting words in other people’s mouths.

You claimed that Ronald Reagan was a "protectionist" and then that any management of trade is "socialistic."

Don't play coy.

659 posted on 05/12/2009 8:21:18 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Let me remind you, again (and for the last time): I’m the one arguing on this thread that Reagan was a free-trader. You won’t even acknowledge it because you are deliberately being obtuse. You think you can score points that way.


660 posted on 05/12/2009 8:26:10 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 761-766 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson