"Green? GREEN? Racist."
Posted on 05/04/2009 10:15:35 AM PDT by JoeProBono
Paul Sinclair of Yorkshire in the UK has been fascinated by UFOs for as long as he can remember but only really got involved in ufology after his first sighting. ‘It involved me and a work colleague. It was at a place called Sledmere on the East Yorkshire Wolds (hill country). It was a bright sunny day and the UFO was just hovering above some trees. What we saw was a structured object of huge size hovering above a field.’ Ever since then Paul has been regularly gazing at the skies. ‘I am the guy who sits in the darkness observing hour in hour out. I am looking for real proof.’
Obviously Paul was excited when he managed to film the footage below on May 1 2009, which he believes may well be an extraterrestrial spaceship, but Paul insists his search for an alien presence in East Yorkshire is far from over.
‘The Wolds UFO phenomenon is real and the dedication needed to sit on the remote Wolds during winter in freezing cold conditions is no less a task than that of a wildlife film maker.’....
Nice shot but I am a hard sell. I am going to have to see the little green creatures exiting the craft before I believe it is a space ship from another planet.
"Green? GREEN? Racist."
OK OK so I was wrong about the color. I told you have haven’t seen one yet. No insult intended. ;9)
Don't worry. He was just kidding anyway...
Alrighty then, you have made me a believer.
There seems to be quite a current crop of
swamp gas, cow fart & TYPE II ERROR addicts.
I see you still have that dreadful death grip on the TYPE II ERROR addiction.
Fascinating phenomenon . . . this frightful flight from
. . . train loads of solid data . . .
by folks who make a persistent pretense of
erudition, logical analysis and objectivity.
What a stinking pile of willful blindness.
I think Ditter has long been a card carrying member of the
TYPE II ERROR addicted club.
I think you’ve had it explained a number of times, ZX12R.
Once more around the block . . .
[uhhhh would it be possible to transfer a little more of that horsepower you wrap your legs around to between your ears, first?—joke]
1. A TYPE I ERROR occurs when one believes that SOMETHING is there, when, in fact, NOTHING SIGNIFICANT IS there.
2. A TYPE II ERROR occurs when one believes that NOTHING is there, when, in fact, SOMETHING SIGNIFICANT IS there.
3. In the statistical analysis of probabilities, even in the “real” world we tangibly contact 24/7, . . . ONE CANNOT HOLD A POSITION TOOOO EXTREME IN AVOIDING ONE TYPE OF ERROR ABOVE—WITHOUT—UNALTERABLY MAKING IT HIGHLY PROBABLE TO VIRTUALLY CERTAIN THAT ONE WILL BECOME VICTIM OF THE OTHER TYPE OF ERROR.
4. Therefore, the arbitrarily blind and obsessive DEATH-GRIP addiction most naysayers have toward AVOIDING a TYPE I ERROR
AUTOMATICALLY LANDS THEM IN THE CONDITION OF HAVING A DEATH-GRIP ADDICTION TO A TYPE II ERROR.
It’s really very elementary, my dear Watson.
I thought I was firmly in the middle of this thing, neither believing nor doubting, just waiting for firm evidence. Now you tell me I have been issued a card?
(where did I put that card?)
ZX12R (naysayer) is very thankful for the explanation. I honestly forgot. And no, no more horsepower, thank you. I just got pulled over again the other day. My bike is a police magnet just because of the way it looks.
LOT
of pain and suffering. Some not.
Depends on the issues, contingencies, field, etc.
IF ONE IS SOOOOO ADDICTED BLINDLY TO AVOIDING A TYPE I ERROR that someone is in one's girlfriend's womb when no one is . . .
that one blindly ignores all the evidence that one has been sucked into the black hole of a TYPE II error believing that no one is in her womb WHEN THERE, IN FACT, IS . . .
the consequences can be considerably challenging and startlingly disruptive to one's life some 9 months hence.
If, however, one is chronically blindly SOOOOO addicted to AVOIDING a TYPE I error that the ice cream truck with its dingy little song has arrived when, in fact, it has NOT arrived
THAT
one is automatically solidly lined up to fall prey to the TYPE II error that the ice cream truck has NOT arrived, when, in fact, it HAS arrived . . .
the consequences are not so dreadful. The worst that happens then is that one loses some money and enjoys some ice cream.
==========================
PROFOUNDLY TENACIOUS TYPE II ERRORS in the field of UFO's portend some serious consequences for some personalities and psychologies.
1. SOME psychologies will become catatonic when the junk falls out of the sky onto the nightly news.
2. Some will become suicidal.
3. Some will become zombied robots slavishly obeying their oligarchic gloablist slave masters because suddenly nothing else seems to make sense any more.
4. Some will become wildly hysterical causing themselves and their loved ones lots of hassle in a context of many other crises and traumas that require the utmost in wisdom and careful behaviors.
5. Some will lose their loosely held faith in God.
6. Some will become ruthlessly cynical and violently, greedily destructive to whatever is beautiful and sane nearby because they suddenly feel so opposite.
7. Some will become suck-ups to the 'new regime' of 'reality' trashing all they have believed and held dear theretofore . . . swallowing the GRAND DECEPTIONS of the oligarchy and their 'space brother' 'saviors' from hell hook, line and sinker.
===============================
I WISH it were nothing more consequential than an ice cream truck and an Eskimo Pie.
Gads, I wish that.
On the other hand, mercifully, GOD WILL STILL BE IN HIS HEAVEN, ON HIS THRONE, WORKING ALL THINGS TOGETHER FOR HIS KINGDOM'S GOOD.
BLESSED BE THE NAME AND WORD OF THE LORD. MARANATHA!
Actually, You do sound in the middle sometimes.
But not always.
Maybe you were issued a provisional card?
Maybe your parrot ate it?
Ahhhhhwwwwww
Sorry to hear that.
They’re probably just jealous and have to spoil your fun ‘cause they’re not having it.
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
with lots of slobbers . . . to you!
Harumph!
[cute]
“Actually, the smallest shred or sliver of un-blurry, un-photoshopped evidence would suffice. Got one?”
You might be interested in the Billy Meier case. Some claim its a hoax but I’m not so sure about that. Still very controversial. Most of the photos and videos are from the mid 1970’s, long before Photoshop. It’s a very complex case and, in my opinion, dwarfs almost any other case. Some of his photos (and photo sequences) are very difficult to explain.
Here are a couple of examples, including detailed photo analysis...
http://www.tjresearch.info/moretree.htm
http://www.tjresearch.info/hasenbol.htm
Have fun!
Yes the parrot! That damed parrot! You are truly a visionary! Would you send me another card, I am going to strangle this parrot right now!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.