Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lindsay Lohan Palimony Payments From Samantha Ronson (wants 10% for the next 5 years)
Pocrunch ^ | April 16th, 2009 | Castina

Posted on 04/17/2009 11:08:30 AM PDT by lewisglad

If Samantha Ronson thought dumping Lindsay Lohan was going to get the fallen child star out of her hair once and for all, she’s in for a rude awakening.

Just two weeks after the former couple’s often volatile romance came crashing to a halt, Lindsay Lohan has threatened to file a palimony suit against her one-time live-in lover.

Lindsay –who has not enjoyed a serious acting gig since the 2007 stinker I Know Who Killed Me– paid for everything during her nearly two year relationship with Samantha.

And now it’s time for payback.

A Star Magazine tattle claims: “Before Lindsay, Sam was making $10,000 per DJ gig. Now she makes $100,000. Lindsay wants a cut, like 10 percent of her future earnings for the next five years.”


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: 2perverted4words; homosexualagenda; pervertpower; perverts; stupidpeople
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 04/17/2009 11:08:31 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Sam was making $10,000 per DJ gig.

You have got to be kidding me

2 posted on 04/17/2009 11:12:17 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Who on god’s green earth is paying those two ho-bags $100,000 to show up?


3 posted on 04/17/2009 11:13:06 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

They weren’t even together for a year were they? Besides since when do same sex couples get palimony? If this is allowed or even makes it to court then everyone who shares rent with another person can file a palimony suit against the other renter(s). How stupid.


4 posted on 04/17/2009 11:15:12 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Lohan must be desperate for money.


5 posted on 04/17/2009 11:16:51 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (my former tagline "We can, and we will prevail" doesn't fit with the usurper's goals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

I’ll go ahead and let you know that prostitution is probably out of the question for Samantha.


6 posted on 04/17/2009 11:17:04 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; PennsylvaniaMom

Isn’t it one of you who has the entertainment/celebrity news ping list?

Thought you might be interested. :)


7 posted on 04/17/2009 11:18:08 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (my former tagline "We can, and we will prevail" doesn't fit with the usurper's goals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Jodie Foster & Ellen have gotten the same ‘Galimony’ suits threatened against them under California law, so I guess it is legal.


8 posted on 04/17/2009 11:18:15 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

>> Who on god’s green earth is paying those two ho-bags $100,000 to show up?

Yeah, $5,000 per pound IS an expensive way to get yer 20 pounds of skank.


9 posted on 04/17/2009 11:21:03 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Pay up, Ed Norton! :)


10 posted on 04/17/2009 11:22:02 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
I guess if Lohan offered her “free carpet” as part of the settlement, that would be redundant, eh?
11 posted on 04/17/2009 11:22:33 AM PDT by MGMSwordsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Samson looks like a twelve year old dressed up as Ed Norton


12 posted on 04/17/2009 11:33:12 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

“Lohan must be desperate for money.”

She stuck the money she had up her nose.


13 posted on 04/17/2009 11:35:15 AM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Lindsay wants a daddy figure, either male or female it seems.


14 posted on 04/17/2009 11:40:00 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Va va va voom! I got a chance with Lindsay Lohan!

15 posted on 04/17/2009 11:40:02 AM PDT by lowbridge (It's not that liberals are ignorant, it's that they know so much that isn't so - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

That creature in the hat is female?

Lohan is sinking into the slough of oblivion despite her great looks. Pity. She was a talented child.


16 posted on 04/17/2009 11:40:07 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Who knew, all I have to do is dress up like Ed Norton and haul a celebutard girlfriend around and people will pay 100k to watch me spin. :)


17 posted on 04/17/2009 11:42:38 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Now that was some expensive carpet. Should have bought the traditional hardwood.


18 posted on 04/17/2009 11:44:48 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Veto!
Pity. She was a talented child.

**************

She was, and as cute as a button. I'm guessing what we're seeing now is a combination of drugs, alcohol and self-loathing.

19 posted on 04/17/2009 11:45:53 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Hah, Ed Norton. Too funny.


20 posted on 04/17/2009 11:46:17 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson