Skip to comments.
Lindsay Lohan Palimony Payments From Samantha Ronson (wants 10% for the next 5 years)
Pocrunch ^
| April 16th, 2009
| Castina
Posted on 04/17/2009 11:08:30 AM PDT by lewisglad
If Samantha Ronson thought dumping Lindsay Lohan was going to get the fallen child star out of her hair once and for all, shes in for a rude awakening.
Just two weeks after the former couples often volatile romance came crashing to a halt, Lindsay Lohan has threatened to file a palimony suit against her one-time live-in lover.
Lindsay who has not enjoyed a serious acting gig since the 2007 stinker I Know Who Killed Me paid for everything during her nearly two year relationship with Samantha.
And now its time for payback.
A Star Magazine tattle claims: Before Lindsay, Sam was making $10,000 per DJ gig. Now she makes $100,000. Lindsay wants a cut, like 10 percent of her future earnings for the next five years.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: 2perverted4words; homosexualagenda; pervertpower; perverts; stupidpeople
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
04/17/2009 11:08:31 AM PDT
by
lewisglad
To: lewisglad
Sam was making $10,000 per DJ gig.
You have got to be kidding me
2
posted on
04/17/2009 11:12:17 AM PDT
by
al baby
(Hi Mom)
To: al baby
Who on god’s green earth is paying those two ho-bags $100,000 to show up?
3
posted on
04/17/2009 11:13:06 AM PDT
by
lewisglad
To: lewisglad
They weren’t even together for a year were they? Besides since when do same sex couples get palimony? If this is allowed or even makes it to court then everyone who shares rent with another person can file a palimony suit against the other renter(s). How stupid.
4
posted on
04/17/2009 11:15:12 AM PDT
by
calex59
To: lewisglad
Lohan must be desperate for money.
5
posted on
04/17/2009 11:16:51 AM PDT
by
proud American in Canada
(my former tagline "We can, and we will prevail" doesn't fit with the usurper's goals.)
To: al baby
I’ll go ahead and let you know that prostitution is probably out of the question for Samantha.
6
posted on
04/17/2009 11:17:04 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Perdogg; PennsylvaniaMom
Isn’t it one of you who has the entertainment/celebrity news ping list?
Thought you might be interested. :)
7
posted on
04/17/2009 11:18:08 AM PDT
by
proud American in Canada
(my former tagline "We can, and we will prevail" doesn't fit with the usurper's goals.)
To: calex59
Jodie Foster & Ellen have gotten the same ‘Galimony’ suits threatened against them under California law, so I guess it is legal.
8
posted on
04/17/2009 11:18:15 AM PDT
by
lewisglad
To: lewisglad
>> Who on gods green earth is paying those two ho-bags $100,000 to show up?
Yeah, $5,000 per pound IS an expensive way to get yer 20 pounds of skank.
9
posted on
04/17/2009 11:21:03 AM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(Party? I don't have one anymore.)
To: AppyPappy
Pay up, Ed Norton! :)
To: lewisglad
I guess if Lohan offered her “free carpet” as part of the settlement, that would be redundant, eh?
To: lewisglad
Samson looks like a twelve year old dressed up as Ed Norton
12
posted on
04/17/2009 11:33:12 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: proud American in Canada
“Lohan must be desperate for money.”
She stuck the money she had up her nose.
13
posted on
04/17/2009 11:35:15 AM PDT
by
LottieDah
(If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
To: PGR88
Lindsay wants a daddy figure, either male or female it seems.
To: lewisglad

Va va va voom! I got a chance with Lindsay Lohan!
15
posted on
04/17/2009 11:40:02 AM PDT
by
lowbridge
(It's not that liberals are ignorant, it's that they know so much that isn't so - Ronald Reagan)
To: lewisglad
That creature in the hat is female?
Lohan is sinking into the slough of oblivion despite her great looks. Pity. She was a talented child.
16
posted on
04/17/2009 11:40:07 AM PDT
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: lowbridge
Who knew, all I have to do is dress up like Ed Norton and haul a celebutard girlfriend around and people will pay 100k to watch me spin. :)
To: al baby
Now that was some expensive carpet. Should have bought the traditional hardwood.
18
posted on
04/17/2009 11:44:48 AM PDT
by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
To: Veto!
Pity. She was a talented child. **************
She was, and as cute as a button. I'm guessing what we're seeing now is a combination of drugs, alcohol and self-loathing.
19
posted on
04/17/2009 11:45:53 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: lewisglad
Hah, Ed Norton. Too funny.
20
posted on
04/17/2009 11:46:17 AM PDT
by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson