To say that the Rendlesham Forest case has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt is quite a stretch, or more correctly, completely wrong. Nothing has been ‘proven’, and its most likely a hoax.
Love it.
Your assertions are utterly
—untrue to the history;
—untrue to the investigations;
—untrue to the evidence;
—untrue to the state of all that currently;
—untrue to even basic logic about the basic facts of the case.
But hey—it’s quite a gift for naysayers to continually make utterly foolish assertions thoroughly ungrounded in fact or logic.
Some of us appreciate it.