UFO ORB With Mothership Photo, Maybe Best Ever!

digest ^ | March 26, 2009

[JoeProBono]

In one of the most spectacular photographs ever captured on film is the elusive Orb UFO with it‘s mothership following in concert with it’s every move. Five Orb’s are seen in the photo below with their Mother Ship in tow in the bright blue light high above.

The photo was taken in Casa Grande Arizona by the State Director of MUFON for Arizona, Christine Dickey. Christine used a Nikon D 90, 2008 model, Pixels 4288 W X 2848 H, resolution is 72 dpi, bit depth is 24, 35 mm focal length F is 4.5, +3 step exposure bias.

Many have asked the question, what is an Orb? Orb’s are small vessels released from a Mother Ship UFO and have been documented over history to have 2 to 3 Alien’s at the controls and are about 30 meters in diameter, used for close observation of Human activity.

Below you will find a series of photo’s starting with close ups of one of the Orb’s then of the Mother Ship, all Thermo and Inferred imaging performed by Ronald Nussbeck at his lab.

[JoJo Gunn]

Just a few minutes ago, I posted: 

"Such irony. I think a lot of the flying saucer crowd are caught up in their own version of the occult."

I use Firefox 99.9999999999 percent of the time, but it's not from squat at saving web pages, so I opened that page in IE, which doesn't have an ad blocker. Lo and behold, what do I see? 

 

Think about it, Quix - we have a woman who took the picture that just happens to be a MUFON whatever, which strains credibility right off the bat. And she spouts religion as if it's some kind of protective shield. And smack in the middle of the page is an ad for a vampire chat room.

Granted, it's a Google ad, but it doesn't help those people's standing.

[Quix]

I’m not the one trying to cram complex diverse realities into a minimal number of tidy little boxes! LOL.

The

SCIENTIFIC

approach would be to let the data lead . . . rather than vainly and arrogantly trying to cram diverse complex realities into limited pretend-tidy little boxes.

[JoJo Gunn]

Plain English, please.

[Quix]

You seem to habitually try and characterize the whole field in very black/white terms . . . and then cram all the complex information into a very limited number of conceptual pseudo-tidy little boxes . . . on one end of that—seemingly a -—black or false end of the black/white all or nothing construction on reality.

The field is far too complex for such a simplistic treatment.

Certainly the superordinate constructs of GOOD/EVIL apply here as well . . . and I, too, can easily cram all the UFO stuff into a black/evil side of things.

However, I do NOT pretend that the vast array of puzzle pieces I’ve collected on the topic would all fit in 3-4 very tidy little conceptual boxes and explain all those puzzle pieces very handily and simplistically.

That would be nonsense—utter insanity.

1. There’s tons of disinformation amidst all the facts.
2. There’s little telling . . . in terms of the puzzle pieces from the ‘whistle blowers’ etc. who is really a whistle-blower and who is a hired disinformation stooge of the oligarchy.

3. Consequently, there’s little telling which of their pronouncements are a scattering of facts amidst the disinformation spreading and which are pure disinformation.

4. It is PLAUSIBLE, but far from certain, that when one has say 100 puzzle pieces from whistle blowers, airline pilots, military personnel, bureaucrats, policemen etc. etc. etc. all saying essentially the same thing but with the expected idiosyncrasies common to such diverse sources . . .

THEN

it is plausibly much more likely that one has learned SOMETHING(S) SIGNIFICANT. One just can’t be absolutely precisely what that something is.

Through-it-all, it is absolutely clear to me that the critters and the oligarchy interacting with them . . . are both fulfilling Bible Prophecy related to the END TIMES. That much has been REDUNDANTLY AFFIRMED AND REAFFIRMED TO ME COUNTLESS TIMES SINCE 1962.

And all the more so the closer we get to the global government.

[Quix]

Hey . . . you have a dictionary!

Then there’s m-w.com

online! LOL.

[1035rep]

Bookmarked.

[JoeProBono]

[Quix]

INDEED.

HEADED THERE MYSELF SHORTLY.

LUB

[JoeProBono]

Night

[JoJo Gunn]

I’m so bad off even the flies won’t light.

[Rocky]

Definitely a slow news day.

[JoeProBono]

Wakeup!Ukraine: Amazing UFO landing filmed by ufologists, video. Posted Saturday, March 28, 2009 10:55:33 PM

[JoJo Gunn]

You seem to habitually try and characterize the whole field in very black/white terms . . . and then cram all the complex information into a very limited number of conceptual pseudo-tidy little boxes . . .

I can only go by what I see, and I see so much "complex" nonsense from the flying saucer crowd when Occam's Razor will do.

Well, I see my comment actually was posted, though as of yet nobody will comment on it specifically. 

However, I do find a particular comment hilarious, one of a supposed photog with over 2 decades of experience, who says the "photos" are something to be proud of. For beginners, there's only one image, and it's been resized, and the "objects" in question have been overlaid onto the resized image, and we're not told how the overlays have been manipulated, and there's circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one describing the scene of the crime. (A little "Alice's Restaurant" reference). She's also magnified the image that's already been reduced, a .jpg where image data has been irretrievably lost forever, (and an unprofessional such as myself understands that image enlargement even with a lossless format such as a .tif or .png is a digital guessing game), yet she sees things that only a "professional" can see?

What a complete loser.

Even a kindergartner knows what dung smells like. 

[JoJo Gunn]

Thanks, but no thanks. Nussbeck and Dickey are the two carnival barkers of the month, hands down, (and “professional” mental cripple Betty Hernandez rates a special mention).

[JoeProBono]

Nussbeck is offering $10,000 to anyone who can debunk these UFO photos

[Quix]

I don’t know what it will take for you to realize

that in the better vetted cases,

OCCAM’S RAZOR IS ON THE SIDE OF OTHERWORLDLY-NESS OF THE PHENOMENON.

Should be interesting when that day occurs.

[JoJo Gunn]

Nussbeck is just another dime store dumbass. The burden of proof is on those who hawk the non-existent.

[JoJo Gunn]

Quix, the subject of this thread is of Nussbeck and Dickey trying to pawn off internal lens reflections as - drum roll, please - a Golden Orb, surrounded by a Red Plasma Corona, and via Occam they have, ahem, been reduced to the lowest common denominator.

Please try not to muddy up the waters with needless and useless "complexity". Thank you.

[Quix]

Too sleepy to argue at the moment.

Cheers.

Night night.

[JoJo Gunn]

I understand. Too much comedy from Nussbeck would likely blow a ‘roid anyway.

Goodbye, please!