I can only go by what I see, and I see so much "complex" nonsense from the flying saucer crowd when Occam's Razor will do.
Well, I see my comment actually was posted, though as of yet nobody will comment on it specifically.
However, I do find a particular comment hilarious, one of a supposed photog with over 2 decades of experience, who says the "photos" are something to be proud of. For beginners, there's only one image, and it's been resized, and the "objects" in question have been overlaid onto the resized image, and we're not told how the overlays have been manipulated, and there's circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one describing the scene of the crime. (A little "Alice's Restaurant" reference). She's also magnified the image that's already been reduced, a .jpg where image data has been irretrievably lost forever, (and an unprofessional such as myself understands that image enlargement even with a lossless format such as a .tif or .png is a digital guessing game), yet she sees things that only a "professional" can see?
What a complete loser.
Even a kindergartner knows what dung smells like.
I don’t know what it will take for you to realize
that in the better vetted cases,
OCCAM’S RAZOR IS ON THE SIDE OF OTHERWORLDLY-NESS OF THE PHENOMENON.
Should be interesting when that day occurs.