You seem to habitually try and characterize the whole field in very black/white terms . . . and then cram all the complex information into a very limited number of conceptual pseudo-tidy little boxes . . . on one end of that—seemingly a -—black or false end of the black/white all or nothing construction on reality.
The field is far too complex for such a simplistic treatment.
Certainly the superordinate constructs of GOOD/EVIL apply here as well . . . and I, too, can easily cram all the UFO stuff into a black/evil side of things.
However, I do NOT pretend that the vast array of puzzle pieces I’ve collected on the topic would all fit in 3-4 very tidy little conceptual boxes and explain all those puzzle pieces very handily and simplistically.
That would be nonsense—utter insanity.
1. There’s tons of disinformation amidst all the facts.
2. There’s little telling . . . in terms of the puzzle pieces from the ‘whistle blowers’ etc. who is really a whistle-blower and who is a hired disinformation stooge of the oligarchy.
3. Consequently, there’s little telling which of their pronouncements are a scattering of facts amidst the disinformation spreading and which are pure disinformation.
4. It is PLAUSIBLE, but far from certain, that when one has say 100 puzzle pieces from whistle blowers, airline pilots, military personnel, bureaucrats, policemen etc. etc. etc. all saying essentially the same thing but with the expected idiosyncrasies common to such diverse sources . . .
THEN
it is plausibly much more likely that one has learned SOMETHING(S) SIGNIFICANT. One just can’t be absolutely precisely what that something is.
Through-it-all, it is absolutely clear to me that the critters and the oligarchy interacting with them . . . are both fulfilling Bible Prophecy related to the END TIMES. That much has been REDUNDANTLY AFFIRMED AND REAFFIRMED TO ME COUNTLESS TIMES SINCE 1962.
And all the more so the closer we get to the global government.
I can only go by what I see, and I see so much "complex" nonsense from the flying saucer crowd when Occam's Razor will do.
Well, I see my comment actually was posted, though as of yet nobody will comment on it specifically.
However, I do find a particular comment hilarious, one of a supposed photog with over 2 decades of experience, who says the "photos" are something to be proud of. For beginners, there's only one image, and it's been resized, and the "objects" in question have been overlaid onto the resized image, and we're not told how the overlays have been manipulated, and there's circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one describing the scene of the crime. (A little "Alice's Restaurant" reference). She's also magnified the image that's already been reduced, a .jpg where image data has been irretrievably lost forever, (and an unprofessional such as myself understands that image enlargement even with a lossless format such as a .tif or .png is a digital guessing game), yet she sees things that only a "professional" can see?
What a complete loser.
Even a kindergartner knows what dung smells like.