Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/12/2009 9:16:43 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

ping. Only 200K year revision.


2 posted on 03/12/2009 9:17:50 AM PDT by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Well, I say they are 10 Million years old.

Can anyone prove me right or wrong?


3 posted on 03/12/2009 9:21:10 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

an interesting article. Thanks.


4 posted on 03/12/2009 9:21:25 AM PDT by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

hoax


6 posted on 03/12/2009 9:24:59 AM PDT by woollyone (I believe God created me- you believe you're related to monkeys. Of course I laughed at you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater; blam; SunkenCiv; thefactor
Thanks for posting. However, unless I am misunderstanding the "out of Africa" anthropologists and their fellow travelers, Peking Man and other Homo erecti contributed NOTHING to modern humans, as every Homo sapiens ancestor came out of Africa around 200k years ago.

While Milton Wolpoff at UMich and other regionalists maintain that these pre-humans DID contribute, the OOA ideologues think Peking Man was a dead end (even though they have some anatomical traits shared by modern Asians).

Am I missing something here?

9 posted on 03/12/2009 9:27:10 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Great! Has he applied for Medicare yet? He’d better hurry!


11 posted on 03/12/2009 9:30:05 AM PDT by RexBeach ("Do your duty in all things." Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
The pre-war Peking Man fossils vanished in 1941 whilst being transported to the US for safekeeping. Luckily, the palaeontologist Franz Weidenreich had made casts for researchers to study.

SNIP

This method is based on the radioactive decay of unstable forms, or isotopes, of the elements aluminium and beryllium in quartz grains. This enabled them to get a more precise age for the fossils.

I imagine this is mostly an example of a writing problem by a journalist, but ... wouldn't dating via radioactive decay show these items to date from shortly before 1941?

13 posted on 03/12/2009 9:32:48 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (American Revolution II -- overdue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

It is a fake...and that has been known for years!


17 posted on 03/12/2009 9:52:58 AM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware of socialism in America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

But, but, but... I thought the Earth was only 6 thousand years old, and Dinosaurs and Man co-existed?

/sarc


18 posted on 03/12/2009 10:01:43 AM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson