Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tau Zero by Poul Anderson available for free online reading
Wowio.com ^ | 1970 | Poul Anderson

Posted on 03/04/2009 8:23:56 AM PST by Mike Fieschko

This is (IMHO) an outstanding work of hard science fiction. From the Wikipedia page:
Tau Zero follows the crew of the starship Leonora Christine, a colonization vessel crewed by 25 men and 25 women. The ship is not capable of FTL travel and so is constrained by relativity. Its engines operate two modes, acceleration and deceleration. The deceleration module becomes damaged during the trip. Because the engines must be running at all times (to provide particle/radiation shielding), and because of the hard radiation produced by the engines, the crew can neither repair the decelerator nor turn off the accelerator. Instead, the ship must accelerate indefinitely, crowding closer and closer to the speed of light.

Much of the novel deals with the crewmembers' reactions to the knowledge that they are being carried further and further into the future (because of the extreme time dilation caused by their ever-increasing velocity) and away from any possibility of contact with humanity. The novel derives considerable power through descriptions of the changing and extreme time dilation effects.
I was notified of the availability via the Univerity of Pennsylvania's New books RSS feed.

Warning: Online reading requires enabling javascript in your browser, and opening the reader puts your browser in full screen mode.


TOPICS: Books/Literature
KEYWORDS: stringtheory

1 posted on 03/04/2009 8:23:57 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

bfltr


2 posted on 03/04/2009 8:28:07 AM PST by mnehring (!!!!!!!SHRUG!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Read this years ago: fascinating concept.


3 posted on 03/04/2009 8:31:48 AM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Another blow to intellectual property rights?


4 posted on 03/04/2009 8:37:48 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I don’t think so, looks like an authorized site.


5 posted on 03/04/2009 8:42:49 AM PST by Sudetenland (Victory in 2012...but first Victory in 2010!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Read it a million time dilated years ago. Great book.


6 posted on 03/04/2009 8:48:20 AM PST by w1cbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Another blow to intellectual property rights?

I'm not very familiar with wowio (this is the first time I visited the site), but only the online reading is free. Downloading the book costs money. They say that the compensate the publisher and copyright-holder.
7 posted on 03/04/2009 8:51:20 AM PST by Mike Fieschko (et numquam abrogatam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Why does time change?

Ever feel like time moves very quickly and sometimes very slowly? Like how the hours fly by when you're hanging out with a close friend, or how seconds drag on endlessly when you're stuck in traffic on a hot day? But you can't actually speed time up or slow it down -it always flows at the same rate, right?

Albert Einstein didn't think so. His idea was that, theoretically, the closer we come to traveling at the speed of light (186,000 miles per second), the more time would appear to slow down for us from the perspective of someone who, in relation to us, was not moving. He called the slowing of time due to motion time dilation.

Imagine you're standing on Earth holding a clock. Your friend is in a rocket zooming past you at nearly 186,000 miles per second. Your friend is also holding a clock. If you could see your friend's clock, you'd notice that it seems to be moving a lot more slowly than yours. Your friend, on the other hand, thinks the clock in the rocket is moving just fine, and it's your clock that seems to be moving more slowly. Sound confusing? Well, remember, it took Einstein years to figure this out, and he was pretty smart (see Genius Among Geniuses).

The twin paradox

Einstein came up with an example to show the effects of time dilation that he called the "twin paradox." It's a lot like the Time Traveler game you just played. Let's try it out with a pair of pretend twins, Al and Bert, both of whom are 10 years old in their highly futuristic universe.

Al's parents decide to send him to summer camp in the Alpha-3 star system, which is 25 light-years away (a light-year is the distance light travels in a year). Bert doesn't want to go and stays home on Earth. So Al sets out on his own. Wanting him to get there as quickly as possible, his parents pay extra and send him at 99.99 percent the speed of light.

The trip to the star and back takes 50 years. What happens when Al returns? His twin brother is now 60 years old, but Al is only 10 and a half. How can this be? Al was away for 50 years but only aged by half a year. Has Al just discovered the fountain of youth?

Not at all. Al's trip into space lasted only a half year for him, but on Earth 50 years passed. Does this mean that Al can live forever? Nope. He may have aged by only half a year in the time it took 50 years to pass on Earth, but he also only lived half a year. And since time can slow down but never goes backwards, there's no way he could grow younger.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/hotsciencetwin/index.html
_______________________________________________

"One second is defined as 'the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom'..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second

Now imagine, instead of a vibrating 'caesium 133 atom', we have a beam of light bouncing back and forth between two mirrors within a vertical tube. Now let's say, for the sake of argument, that it takes precisely 'one second' for the light beam to reach the top mirror (tick), reflect off it, reverse and reach the bottom mirror (tock).

Now let's say the light tube, or 'light clock', is resting on a flatbed train car, and on the flatbed is an observer who we will call "Observer A". To Observer A, who is moving along with the train and is therefore 'at rest' with respect to it, the light beam simply travels from the bottom of the tube *vertically* to the top of the tube and then straight back down again. From the relationship, speed equals distance over time, we get time equals distance over speed. So this is then how Observer A defines time (t=distance/speed). Important to note here is that light travels at the SAME SPEED for ALL observers.

Now let's say there is an observer B standing on the embankment alongside the train watching it pass by. From this observer's point of view, or frame of reference, the light beam does NOT simply travel vertically up and down. Rather, it travels on a slanted or diagonal path since the train is in motion, let's say from left to right as Observer B sees it. Now since the light beam travels a diagonal path between tick and tock, again, from OB's stationary point of view, the light beam therefore is traveling a LONGER distance (from OB's perspective). Therefore, since the light beam is traveling a longer distance (from OB's perspective) AND since light travels at the same speed for all observers, the light beam MUST take a longer time to bounce between the two mirrors (tick-tock). Therefore, the two observers (A and B) do NOT agree on what a "second" is.-etl


http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/srelwhat.html

The mathematical relationship between the two paths is based on the Pythagorean Theorem for right-triangles that most of us learned in high school: c^2 = a^2 + b^2 (c in the formula is the length of the hy.-etl

8 posted on 03/04/2009 8:53:00 AM PST by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

This is my favorite Poul Anderson story, bar none.


9 posted on 03/04/2009 9:15:46 AM PST by NewMexLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
The Baen Free Library is another good source for free science fiction books. Baen Free library lets you download the books in several formats.
10 posted on 03/04/2009 9:22:46 AM PST by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

sci fi ping


11 posted on 03/04/2009 10:04:37 AM PST by DeLaine (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DeLaine

Thanks hun.


12 posted on 03/04/2009 10:23:39 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 42 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: scan59

Ping for reading this evening.


13 posted on 03/04/2009 11:13:57 AM PST by scan59 (Markets regulate better than government can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 6ppc
The Gutenbuerg Project has many books available for download, including the works of H.G. Wells and Jules Verne, among many others
14 posted on 03/04/2009 11:28:53 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NewMexLurker
"This is my favorite Poul Anderson story, bar none."

I like "Brain Wave" best.

15 posted on 03/04/2009 11:31:16 AM PST by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

I picked “Brain Wave” up at a second hand book store years ago. Small book as I recall, but you’re right, it was a good one.


16 posted on 03/04/2009 1:13:31 PM PST by NewMexLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks to Mike Fieschko for posting this nice change of pace topic for the list.

· Google ·

17 posted on 03/04/2009 4:29:19 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

BRB thanks for the ping Civ.


18 posted on 03/04/2009 4:32:22 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

bttt


19 posted on 03/04/2009 6:49:43 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson