Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/26/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by jackofhearts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: jackofhearts

I do not doubt it at all.


2 posted on 02/26/2009 1:16:54 PM PST by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

And so are the other media moguls.

However, the story will bust wide open one day.


3 posted on 02/26/2009 1:17:20 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts
I have it on impeccable authority but cannot disclose my source...

Where have we heard that before?

4 posted on 02/26/2009 1:17:28 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

Of course they’re supressing it. Obama likely was born in Kenya...people there remember it...and his grandmother who died suddenly during the last days of the campaign...told neighbors that her daughter’s baby was born in Africa.

But right now the economy is in free fall...the Messiah is seen as necessary to keep certain folks in line.

Nobody’s gonna cover this.


5 posted on 02/26/2009 1:17:43 PM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts
sitting on the Obama eligibility/birth certficate story

Sitting on what? the fact that there is a question? Or some new info about it?

6 posted on 02/26/2009 1:19:18 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts
So you an impeccable authority/source, but no e-mail or fax numbers?

C'mon...

7 posted on 02/26/2009 1:19:29 PM PST by DTogo (Time to bring back the Sons of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

Maybe if they really work on it, any revelations will come out before the election......


12 posted on 02/26/2009 1:22:32 PM PST by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

Is it gaining traction because of the soliders who joined in the lawsuit?


13 posted on 02/26/2009 1:23:24 PM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

FOX? You mean that bastion of conservative thought which fell right in line with the rest of the MSM in building an altar to Hussein the Great? Well knock me over with a feather!


15 posted on 02/26/2009 1:24:35 PM PST by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts
This misses the point...for the story to have legs, would mean that Obama would have to be impeached at this point.

Who is in charge of impeaching? That's right, Congress...

Who is in charge of Congress? That's right, Obama's ilk...

Who in the Congressional Democratic fold would vote FOR impeachment? That's right...no one.

It's a dead issue till at least 2010.

Perhaps that is why it's getting suppressed for now (here's to hoping at least)...

17 posted on 02/26/2009 1:24:54 PM PST by NorCoGOP (Recession: friend loses his job. Depression: You lose your job. Recovery: Obama loses his job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

I am 100% certain they are, and I don’t have an inside scoop at Fox or anywhere else. BUT... I do have a source in Homeland Security, and what that source tells me is that all of DC is covering it up, including the SCOTUS. They think its safer to have an Ursurper in power than it is to toss his ass in Jail where it belongs. Damn the “Riots” that the left has threatened us with. Nothing that OholyO does is LEGAL and that has HUGE ramifications. Not to mention no nation will abide by a damn thing he signs.


18 posted on 02/26/2009 1:25:06 PM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts
First Amendment Check
Second Amendment Check
20 posted on 02/26/2009 1:26:24 PM PST by FlashBack ('0'bama: "Katrina on a Global Level")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

What do you suppose is the reason for this? Are they saving the story for a time when things get much much worse?
We have already suffered a bloodless coup de etat!
We are not about to be taxed into poverty. I was going to go through the closets and cupboards and donate to goodwill the things we don’t use often enough etc but...well now my donatin’ days are over..who knows how things will be in the next year or so..may not be able to replace those wine glasses we are not using at the moment...


23 posted on 02/26/2009 1:29:34 PM PST by celtic gal (I think the democRATs should change their logo from a jackass to a RAT with a long tail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

If your source KNOWS this to be true and this is coming from inside Fox News, why can’t your source provide the fax numbers?


27 posted on 02/26/2009 1:33:22 PM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

Then find out from your source what evidence they are sitting on and produce it here. Get it out in public somehow.


28 posted on 02/26/2009 1:35:15 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

ANY ACORN lawyer is no accetable president of mine, I don’t even care anymore.

I figure with all the fradulent/felonious/government teet suckers that voted for Obama, a ‘Constitutional’ lawyer, that seems hell bent on destroying the Constitution, I could go on, but you get the idea.

If you could prove without any doubt that this joker is not qualified to be POTUS, it still would not matter, so... if Fox/Murdock had it, they’d break it.

I digress. If they in fact have proof, break it, don’t be sissys(sp), at least it will cause “something else” to happen, whether it just be aggravation for him, I think it can’t possibly be worse than what we have now, which is a one way ticket to slippery slope he11.


30 posted on 02/26/2009 1:37:39 PM PST by ChetNavVet (Build It, and they won't come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

If he didn’t have a birth certificate before the election, you can bet your ass he has one now. I am sure the most powerful person in the world can get a piece of paper.

Stop wasting your mind on this, if it ever actually happened, you will know.


32 posted on 02/26/2009 1:38:42 PM PST by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts

When killing the king, you must kill. Wounding is very dangerous.

Patience is a virtue


33 posted on 02/26/2009 1:39:21 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The original point of America was not to be Europe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts; mnehrling; Red Steel
I find the this apocryphal story plausible even credible. There is no business reason to embargo this story. Indeed, it should be a big money maker for a 24-hour news channel like Fox. It would not be particularly expensive to cover and it would go on and on which are the twin pillars of moneymaking stories for these 24-hour news venues.

Yet the story does not appear. It does not appear at all, it has been utterly shut down. It has been spiked! One would think that it would be mentioned at least in passing to maintain the illusion of journalistic credibility but that is not the case. One is compelled to wonder why?

It is possible, I suppose, to credit Murdoch with a patriotic concern that the story has the potential to cast the country into a constitutional crisis at a time when it is fighting two wars abroad, faces potential terrorist attacks at home, and is threatened by the gravest financial crisis at least since the Great Depression. I concede that it is plausible that a man like Maxwell simply might conclude that the country cannot afford to go through a Watergate again, especially at this time of crisis. This is not my view, I think the Constitution must prevail or the contrary is ultimately doomed.

Another possibility is that Murdoch, aware of the pressure brought by Obama's forces against media outlets that cut too close to the quick during the campaign, in fact, they were directly threatened, is intimidated. It could simply be that Murdoch is craven. But Murdoch is not alone, no other outlet has touched the story either. Rush Limbaugh has a great deal of editorial license and he has not touched the story to my knowledge. Why is the reluctance to open the story universal?

It could be that these gatekeepers of our news and opinion have concluded that it is counterproductive to the Republican cause to affiliate itself with a story which is considered by them to be something that can be discussed only when wearing a tinfoil hat. My problem with this is that fastidiousness is hardly the hallmark of media outlets. Indeed, respect for the truth has not always been the North Star for broadcasters such as Dan Rather. It is hard to believe that they would all unanimously shrink from the story because they think it is just bogus. These are hard-bitten men and they surely must understand that the Obama can end this story merely with the production of a $10 document, but he has spent $1 million to avoid doing so. These men must surely smell a rat. Why are they not personally curious?

I do not know the answers to these conundrums. I would be grateful to hear other opinions.


35 posted on 02/26/2009 1:40:10 PM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jackofhearts
How is it that you have impeccable sources at FOX?

I'm not doubting you but would like to know.

37 posted on 02/26/2009 1:41:10 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson