Skip to comments.
61st homicide victim identified (Shot by Owner while stealing SUV)
wlbt ^
| 12.08.08
Posted on 02/25/2009 4:40:53 PM PST by Coleus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
02/25/2009 4:40:53 PM PST
by
Coleus
To: Coleus
You can kill to protect property in MS? my Florida CCW class said only in danger of IMMINENT Death do you fire.
2
posted on
02/25/2009 4:42:40 PM PST
by
omega4179
(Jindal MMXII)
To: Coleus
3
posted on
02/25/2009 4:43:24 PM PST
by
LukeL
(Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
To: Coleus
Jackson, MS is more dangerous to live in than being on combat missions Iraq and Afghanistan (combined)...
4
posted on
02/25/2009 4:43:32 PM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: omega4179
It’s the same in Texas. Florida is overrun with NY/NJ types and the States’ laws reflect it.
5
posted on
02/25/2009 4:43:46 PM PST
by
txnativegop
(God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
To: Coleus
"You hate to see a young person lose his life in this manner, but those are the consequences when you take actions as such." If this 'young person' (read some kind of underprivileged yute) was doing what was alleged, then NO I don't mind he/she/it allegedly losing their life.
6
posted on
02/25/2009 4:44:23 PM PST
by
Gaffer
To: Coleus
The unidentified vehicle owner was questioned and released. Then its not a homicide.
To: Mr_Moonlight
I believe the correct term is "public service shooting."
Then its not a homicide.
8
posted on
02/25/2009 4:46:31 PM PST
by
Salo
To: omega4179
and from reading other articles, it appears as though he was unarmed, running away and shot in the back.
9
posted on
02/25/2009 4:47:04 PM PST
by
Coleus
(Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
To: omega4179
In Florida you can shoot to prevent rape robbery and kidnapping.
Property crimes are a gray issue.
To: Mr_Moonlight
Then its not a homicide. Yes it is. Homicide is properly defined as the act of a human killing another human. What we have here is justifiable homicide.
11
posted on
02/25/2009 4:47:58 PM PST
by
Drew68
To: Drew68; Salo
Thanks for the clarification
To: omega4179
Florida seems rather unreasonable.
13
posted on
02/25/2009 4:50:20 PM PST
by
RobRoy
(Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in the 1930's.)
To: omega4179
You can kill to protect property in MS? my Florida CCW class said only in danger of IMMINENT Death do you fire.Different states have different laws.
14
posted on
02/25/2009 4:51:39 PM PST
by
Cobra64
To: omega4179
only in danger of IMMINENT Death It's a litte broader than that:
"you may stand your ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if you reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm to yourself or others." (this is a paraphrase)
15
posted on
02/25/2009 4:52:50 PM PST
by
tbpiper
To: omega4179
...my Florida CCW class said only in danger of IMMINENT Death do you fire Which is patently false. The Florida Castle Law allows you to defend yourself with a firearm if someone intends you harm and you are not required to run away.
16
posted on
02/25/2009 5:04:00 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Socialism and Liberty are mutually exclusive.)
To: Mr_Moonlight
Then its not a homicide. Yes it is. Homicide = human killing human. You mean its not murder. Think about the term justifiable homicide.
17
posted on
02/25/2009 5:05:31 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Socialism and Liberty are mutually exclusive.)
To: Coleus
You hate to see a young person lose his life in this manner, but those are the consequences when you take actions as such.Now the deceased Mr. Lenard enjoys the unique opportunity to serve as a lesson to others.
18
posted on
02/25/2009 5:06:19 PM PST
by
Drew68
To: RobRoy
There is bad info here. Florida is a Castle Law State. If someone is intent on doing you harm, you can shoot them.
19
posted on
02/25/2009 5:07:01 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Socialism and Liberty are mutually exclusive.)
To: Coleus
Pest control. A proper government would refund the cost of the shell. IMHO.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson