Posted on 02/24/2009 9:49:40 PM PST by nickcarraway
With its flattened face, the fish's eyes appear to be directed forward and may provide it with binocular vision, a special attribute well developed in humans that provides the ability to accurately judge distance. Only very few fishes have eyes whose radius of vision overlaps in front, providing such vision. (Use of image restricted, see end of release.)
A H. psychedelica jettisons itself through the water. More than a dozen individuals have been seen in Ambon Harbor, Indonesia, since divers with Maluku Divers first spotted one of the fish in January 2008. The fish have been found in 15 to 25 feet of water near a commercial jetty in the busy harbor. (Use of image restricted, see end of release.)
©David Hall/seaphotos.com A H. psychedelica sits on its leg-like pectoral fins, with its tail curled about to one side. It prefers to inhabit crevices and holes in the reef, sometimes vigorously twisting and turning its body to enter such spaces. The skin of the body is thick, loose and spongy. Perhaps that's the reason the fish moves among sharp edged corals without being scraped and scarred. (Use of image restricted, see end of release.)
"Psychedelica" seems the perfect name for a species of fish that is a wild swirl of tan and peach zebra stripes and behaves in ways contrary to its brethren. So says University of Washington's Ted Pietsch, who is the first to describe the new species in the scientific literature and thus the one to select the name.
Psychedelica is perhaps even more apt given the cockamamie way the fish swim, some with so little control they look intoxicated and should be cited for DUI.
Members of Histiophryne psychedelica, or H. psychedelica, don't so much swim as hop. Each time they strike the seafloor they use their fins to push off and they expel water from tiny gill openings on their sides to jettison themselves forward. With tails curled tightly to one side --which surely limits their ability to steer -- they look like inflated rubber balls bouncing hither and thither.
While other frogfish and similar species are known to jettison themselves up off the bottom before they begin swimming, none have been observed hopping. It's just one of the behaviors of H. psychedelica never observed in any other fish, says Pietsch, UW professor of aquatic and fishery sciences and curator of fishes at the UW Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture. He's the lead author of a paper about the new species that's now online at Copeia, the journal of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. His work is funded by the National Science Foundation.
It was little more than a year ago that the fish with rare, forward-facing eyes like humans and a secretive nature was the subject of worldwide news coverage after having been observed in the busy harbor of Ambon Island, Indonesia. An adult fish was observed in January 2008 by Toby Fadirsyair, a guide, and Buck and Fitrie Randolph, two of the co-owners of Maluku Divers, which is based in Ambon. They and co-owners Andy and Kerry Shorten eventually found Pietsch to help them identify the fish. Since the first sighting divers have observed a number of adults and juveniles, now that they know what to look for.
Adults of H. psychedelica are fist-sized with gelatinous bodies covered with thick folds of skin that protect them from sharp-edged corals as they haunt tiny nooks and crannies of the harbor reef. Fins on either side of their bodies have, as with other frogfish, evolved to be leg-like, and members of H. psychedelica actually prefer crawling to swimming.
The species has a flattened face with eyes directed forward. It's something Pietsch, with 40 years of experience studying and classifying fishes, has never seen before in frogfish. It causes him to speculate that the species may have binocular vision, that is, vision that overlaps in front, like it does in humans. Most fish, with eyes on either side of their head, don't have vision that overlaps; instead they see different things with each eye.
DNA work revealed that H. psychedelica joins two other species in the genus Histiophryne, though the other two are very drably colored in comparison. The genus is but one of about a dozen in the family Antennariidae, known as frogfish in most places in the world. The frogfish are, in turn, part of the larger order of Lophiiformes, or anglerfish. Pietsch is the world's foremost anglerfish authority and, when sent a photo last year of the newfound fish, he said he'd stake his reputation that it was an anglerfish.
He was right. But what an unusual member it turned out to be.
Compared to other anglerfish, members of H. psychedelica have no lures. Most anglerfish have lures growing out of their foreheads. The other anglerfish sit right out in the open on the seafloor or coral reefs, often adapting their coloring so their bodies are camouflaged, but the lures are meant to be noticed so the fish wave, wiggle and sometimes blink the lures on and off in order to attract pray, Pietsch says.
Instead of all that showiness, members of H. psychedelica are shy and secretive, probably one of the reasons they weren't previously spotted. When a member of H. psychedelica is uncovered by divers it usually seeks a new place to hide within 10 or 15 minutes.
And while other anglerfish change their coloring depending on the environment, the new species appears to maintain its wild striping no matter the surroundings.
The coloring led co-author David Hall, a wildlife photographer and owner of seaphotos.com, to speculate that the fish is mimicking corals. Indeed, Hall produced photos for the new scientific paper showing corals the animals may be mimicking.
The other co-author, Rachel Arnold, who is a UW master's student in aquatic and fishery sciences, did the DNA work on the new species. Arnold, who dove in Ambon Harbor last year, said the striping of each fish is distinctive, "like a fingerprint of patterning on their body so from whatever angle you look, you can tell individuals apart."
The scientists found, however, that the vivid colors faded in a matter of days once a specimen was preserved in ethanol. The flesh of the preserved specimen looks white, but with a microscope one can still see the striping, Pietsch discovered.
This got him thinking about two specimens sent to him in 1992 that he'd kept as part of the UW's fish collection. The Dallas Aquarium had sent him two frogfish, found in a shipment of live fishes from Bali that they said had unusual pigment patterns. The staff had nicknamed them "paisley frogfish." But the photograph Pietsch was sent was of poor quality and the preserved specimens Pietsch received were white, so he didn't give them much thought.
Pietsch retrieved the old specimens from the collection, put them under a microscope and found the striping distinctive to H. psychedelica. He'd had two specimen of a new species of fish for 17 years, but didn't know it.
Watch more QuickTime segments at http://uwfishcollection.org/psychedelica.
Far out!
That’s a fish? Looks like an underwater, peyote, horned toad.
Very visually disruptive I must say? Which end is which?
That would look great on a sushi board.
It goes well with wasabi.
And they know these "leg-lke" apendages have evolved from earlier being like more typical fins -- how? Are there fossils showing the fin changes in so-called frog-fish, or is this just another one of those assumptions that keeps getting into the mix, and is called "science"?
And this from a guy who admits
Years ago, I pointed out to a biologist that what was classified as being "one species" was actually two, but got argued with, up one side, and down the other.
Now the law recognizes that these overlapping populations of very similar deep water fish are two, and have different harvest limits for them, also. But I can tell you, from an informed point of view, the laws concerning them are all but FUBAR. They screwed it up so much, not only from the beginning, but all along the line, that they, the fishery managers don't even know what was harvested. The "numbers" are as much fiction as truth. (one species got counted as another, for a very long time...even after the regs were implemented, since the regs themselves were bass-akwards concerning the proportional numbers of each species in respect to the other, and the fisherman could get away with pushing one kind across the dock as the other --- it FURTHER re-inforced the errors!)
Now, the "numbers they go by" are written in stone, but it's still FUBAR! Scientists, oh how I love them. Why do they so often have to be such over-educated dumbasses???
More like a Monkfish or Stargazer.
"ACORN registered me and my school as Democrat voters.
Then they got me a mortgage, whatever that is."
FIRST PHOTOS: Fish With Transparent Head, “Barrel” Eyes
nationalgeographic | February 23, 2009
Posted on 02/23/2009 6:52:47 PM PST by JoeProBono
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2192507/posts
Most “scientists” are bottle washers and button sorters.
LAZARUS LONG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.